The Correspondence of Charles S. Peirce and the Open Court Publishing Company, 1890–1913 ed. by Stetson J. Robinson (review)

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 N/A PHILOSOPHY
Cornelis de Waal
{"title":"The Correspondence of Charles S. Peirce and the Open Court Publishing Company, 1890–1913 ed. by Stetson J. Robinson (review)","authors":"Cornelis de Waal","doi":"10.2979/csp.2023.a900120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: The Correspondence of Charles S. Peirce and the Open Court Publishing Company, 1890–1913 ed. by Stetson J. Robinson Cornelis de Waal Edited by Stetson J. Robinson The Correspondence of Charles S. Peirce and the Open Court Publishing Company, 1890–1913 Berlin: De Gruyter, 2022. 666pp., incl. index The fifth volume in the Peirceana series brings us the extensive correspondence between Peirce and the Open Court Publishing Company (abbreviated to OCP by Robinson). The double-barreled opening shot consists of two letters (one by Francis Russell and one by Open Court’s Editor Paul Carus) aimed at soliciting a contribution from [End Page 109] Peirce for the inaugural issue of a new quarterly journal to be published by the Open Court, called The Monist. Carus had been particularly impressed by Peirce’s Illustrations of the Logic of Science papers, which had appeared over a decade earlier in Popular Science Monthly, and to which Russell had drawn Carus’s attention.1 Peirce quickly responded, suggesting not one but an entire series of articles, the first of which to be titled “The Architecture of Theories.” It proved the beginning of a productive but also turbulent relationship between Peirce and the publishing company. The final letter in the exchange comes again from Carus, written September 10, 1913, about seven months before Peirce died. The Open Court Collection at Southern Illinois University Carbondale, from which much of the correspondence is drawn, is a truly magnificent collection. It contains not only business correspondence and financial records, but also the various stages of the publishing process. It includes the original texts that Peirce sent to the publisher, as well as the often heavily corrected galleys and proofs—material that is used appreciatively by the Peirce Edition Project for its critical edition of Peirce’s Writings. When we combine this record with the Nachlass of a philosopher who lived in a continuously expanding mansion with a penchant for keeping each and every scrap of paper, we get a remarkably full picture of everything that went into the publication of Peirce’s work with the Open Court. In contrast, we know painfully little of what went on at the Century Company, which published the Century Dictionary to which Peirce so heavily contributed, or of James Mark Baldwin’s treatment of Peirce’s submissions when he compiled his Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology. Neither venture seems to have left any records, apart from what survived within Peirce’s own papers— at least no such records have so far been found. We know a bit more about Peirce’s dealings with The Nation, but again, almost exclusively because of what has been preserved in Peirce’s papers. Robinson’s hefty tome makes the correspondence between Peirce and the Open Court widely available for the first time. The book opens with a short explanation of the editorial method, a helpful chronology, and a brief historical introduction describing Peirce’s relationship with the Open Court. The work also contains fourteen illustrations, mostly of letters. The introduction to the volume is brief and largely piggybacks on a handful of sources, such as the Introduction to Volume 8 of the Writings, rather than that it was inspired by the collection of letters that follows it, or by a closer familiarity with the archival holdings of the Open Court.2 In his introduction, Robinson divides Peirce’s relationship with the publishing company in four periods: A very active 1890–1894, which includes Peirce’s familiar Monist Metaphysical papers, his contributions to the fortnightly The Open Court, and his [End Page 110] attempts at writing an elementary arithmetic. This period ends with a falling out between Peirce and Hegeler. It is followed by a far more subdued 1894–1897, where the relationship with the publisher is largely restored by Russell, and which results in an extensive discussion by Peirce of the third volume of Ernst Schröder’s Vorlesungen über die Algebra der Logik, which appeared in two parts in The Monist. This period too ends with a falling out. The activity picks up again in 1904, resulting in Peirce’s famous pragmatism papers as well as the “Some Amazing Mazes” series of 1908...","PeriodicalId":45325,"journal":{"name":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/csp.2023.a900120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: The Correspondence of Charles S. Peirce and the Open Court Publishing Company, 1890–1913 ed. by Stetson J. Robinson Cornelis de Waal Edited by Stetson J. Robinson The Correspondence of Charles S. Peirce and the Open Court Publishing Company, 1890–1913 Berlin: De Gruyter, 2022. 666pp., incl. index The fifth volume in the Peirceana series brings us the extensive correspondence between Peirce and the Open Court Publishing Company (abbreviated to OCP by Robinson). The double-barreled opening shot consists of two letters (one by Francis Russell and one by Open Court’s Editor Paul Carus) aimed at soliciting a contribution from [End Page 109] Peirce for the inaugural issue of a new quarterly journal to be published by the Open Court, called The Monist. Carus had been particularly impressed by Peirce’s Illustrations of the Logic of Science papers, which had appeared over a decade earlier in Popular Science Monthly, and to which Russell had drawn Carus’s attention.1 Peirce quickly responded, suggesting not one but an entire series of articles, the first of which to be titled “The Architecture of Theories.” It proved the beginning of a productive but also turbulent relationship between Peirce and the publishing company. The final letter in the exchange comes again from Carus, written September 10, 1913, about seven months before Peirce died. The Open Court Collection at Southern Illinois University Carbondale, from which much of the correspondence is drawn, is a truly magnificent collection. It contains not only business correspondence and financial records, but also the various stages of the publishing process. It includes the original texts that Peirce sent to the publisher, as well as the often heavily corrected galleys and proofs—material that is used appreciatively by the Peirce Edition Project for its critical edition of Peirce’s Writings. When we combine this record with the Nachlass of a philosopher who lived in a continuously expanding mansion with a penchant for keeping each and every scrap of paper, we get a remarkably full picture of everything that went into the publication of Peirce’s work with the Open Court. In contrast, we know painfully little of what went on at the Century Company, which published the Century Dictionary to which Peirce so heavily contributed, or of James Mark Baldwin’s treatment of Peirce’s submissions when he compiled his Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology. Neither venture seems to have left any records, apart from what survived within Peirce’s own papers— at least no such records have so far been found. We know a bit more about Peirce’s dealings with The Nation, but again, almost exclusively because of what has been preserved in Peirce’s papers. Robinson’s hefty tome makes the correspondence between Peirce and the Open Court widely available for the first time. The book opens with a short explanation of the editorial method, a helpful chronology, and a brief historical introduction describing Peirce’s relationship with the Open Court. The work also contains fourteen illustrations, mostly of letters. The introduction to the volume is brief and largely piggybacks on a handful of sources, such as the Introduction to Volume 8 of the Writings, rather than that it was inspired by the collection of letters that follows it, or by a closer familiarity with the archival holdings of the Open Court.2 In his introduction, Robinson divides Peirce’s relationship with the publishing company in four periods: A very active 1890–1894, which includes Peirce’s familiar Monist Metaphysical papers, his contributions to the fortnightly The Open Court, and his [End Page 110] attempts at writing an elementary arithmetic. This period ends with a falling out between Peirce and Hegeler. It is followed by a far more subdued 1894–1897, where the relationship with the publisher is largely restored by Russell, and which results in an extensive discussion by Peirce of the third volume of Ernst Schröder’s Vorlesungen über die Algebra der Logik, which appeared in two parts in The Monist. This period too ends with a falling out. The activity picks up again in 1904, resulting in Peirce’s famous pragmatism papers as well as the “Some Amazing Mazes” series of 1908...
查尔斯S.皮尔斯与公开法庭出版公司的通信,1890-1913年,斯泰森J.罗宾逊编辑(评论)
《查尔斯·s·皮尔斯与公开法庭出版公司的通信》,1890-1913年,斯泰森·j·罗宾逊编辑,科内利斯·德瓦尔编辑,查尔斯·s·皮尔斯与公开法庭出版公司的通信,1890-1913年,柏林:德格鲁伊特出版社,2022年。666页。佩尔西阿纳系列的第五卷为我们带来了佩尔西与公开法庭出版公司(罗宾逊缩写为OCP)之间的广泛通信。这个双管开头的镜头由两封信组成(一封来自Francis Russell,一封来自Open Court的编辑Paul Carus),目的是请Peirce为Open Court即将出版的新季刊《一元论》(The Monist)的创刊号投稿。皮尔斯十多年前发表在《大众科学月刊》(Popular Science Monthly)上的《科学逻辑图解》给卡鲁斯留下了特别深刻的印象,正是罗素引起了卡鲁斯的注意皮尔斯很快做出了回应,建议他写一系列文章,而不是一篇,其中第一篇的标题是“理论的架构”。这证明了皮尔斯和出版公司之间富有成效但也动荡不安的关系的开始。交流中的最后一封信还是来自卡鲁斯,写于1913年9月10日,大约在皮尔斯去世前七个月。南伊利诺伊大学卡本代尔分校的公开法庭收藏是一个真正宏伟的收藏,其中大部分信件都来自该收藏。它不仅包含业务信函和财务记录,还包含出版过程的各个阶段。它包括皮尔斯寄给出版商的原始文本,以及经常经过大量修改的草稿和校对材料,这些材料被皮尔斯版本项目用于其批评版的皮尔斯作品。当我们把这个记录和一个哲学家的Nachlass结合起来,他住在一个不断扩大的豪宅里,喜欢保存每一张废纸,我们得到了一个非常完整的画面,关于皮尔斯与公开法庭的作品出版的所有事情。相比之下,我们对世纪公司(Century Company)的情况却知之甚少。世纪公司出版了《世纪词典》(Century Dictionary),皮尔斯为此做出了巨大贡献。我们也不知道詹姆斯·马克·鲍德温(James Mark Baldwin)在编纂《哲学与心理学词典》(Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology)时如何处理皮尔斯提交的意见。这两次探险似乎都没有留下任何记录,除了Peirce自己的文件中幸存下来的记录——至少到目前为止还没有发现这样的记录。我们对皮尔斯与《国家》的交易了解得更多,但同样,这几乎完全是因为皮尔斯的文件中保存的东西。罗宾逊的巨著使得皮尔斯和公开法庭之间的通信第一次被广泛使用。这本书的开头是对编辑方法的简短解释,一个有用的年表,以及一个简短的历史介绍,描述了皮尔斯与公开法庭的关系。该作品还包含14幅插图,大部分是信件。这本书的引言很简短,很大程度上借鉴了一些资料,比如《文集》第8卷的引言,而不是说它的灵感来自于随后的信件收集,或者更熟悉公开法庭的档案。2在他的引言中,罗宾逊将皮尔斯与出版公司的关系分为四个阶段:1890-1894年,他非常活跃,其中包括皮尔斯所熟悉的一元论形而上学的论文,他为两周报《公开法庭》所做的贡献,以及他试图写一个基本的算术。这一时期以皮尔斯和海格勒之间的争吵结束。随后是1894年至1897年的一段平静得多的时期,罗素在很大程度上恢复了与出版商的关系,这导致了皮尔斯对恩斯特Schröder的《代数与逻辑》第三卷的广泛讨论,这本书分两部分出现在《一元论》中。这段时期也以争吵结束。1904年,这一活动再次活跃起来,产生了皮尔斯著名的实用主义论文,以及1908年的“一些惊人的迷宫”系列……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society has been the premier peer-reviewed journal specializing in the history of American philosophy since its founding in 1965. Although named for the founder of American pragmatism, American philosophers of all schools and periods, from the colonial to the recent past, are extensively discussed. TCSPS regularly includes essays, and every significant book published in the field is discussed in a review essay. A subscription to the journal includes membership in the Charles S. Peirce Society, which was founded in 1946 by Frederic H. Young. The purpose of the Society is to encourage study of and communication about the work of Peirce and its ongoing influence in the many fields of intellectual endeavor to which he contributed.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信