Effect of different surface treatments on tensile bond strength of acrylic denture teeth to CAD/CAM denture base

RehabA El-Refay, MohamedM El-Sheikh, AmalA Salm
{"title":"Effect of different surface treatments on tensile bond strength of acrylic denture teeth to CAD/CAM denture base","authors":"RehabA El-Refay, MohamedM El-Sheikh, AmalA Salm","doi":"10.4103/tdj.tdj_24_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study evaluated the effect of different surface treatments on tensile bond strength of acrylic denture teeth to prepolymerized computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) denture base resin (PMMA) under two different storage conditions. Patients and methods 160 test specimens were used in this study, each specimen has two parts: the first part: is an acrylic cross-linked maxillary central incisor denture tooth embedded in acrylic resin blocks, and the second part: is cone shape (5 mm × 5 mm × 3 mm) specimens prepared from prepolymerized PMMA discs by computer numerically controlled (CNC) milling machine under water cooling. Test specimens were divided into four main groups 40 each according to tooth surface treatment. Group I: no sandblasting. Group II: sandblasted using 50 μm aluminum oxide. Group III: sandblasted using 150 μm Al2O3. Group IV: sandblasted using 200 μm Al2O3. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups (A, B) 20 each, subgroup A used resin cement bond first part with the second part. Subgroup B used a bonding agent to bond the first part with the second part. Each subgroup was divided into 10 specimens that were stored in 50 hours of distilled water storage and 10 specimens were thermocycling. All specimens were then subjected to a tensile load using testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until debonding. The resulting debonding forces were recorded and statistically analyzed. For all specimens, the interface was inspected. The interface failures were classified into adhesive and cohesive failures. The data were analyzed using a three-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey's test. Results The highest mean value tensile bond strength was recorded for GIV (6.5 ± 1.46). Sandblasting was improving the tensile bond strength value of all the specimens. Bonding agents without and with surface treatment significantly improved the tensile bond strength of all specimens. The thermocycling significantly decreased the tensile bond strength of all specimens. Conclusion Sandblasting of denture teeth followed by bonding agent improved the tensile bond strength to CAD/CAM denture base. Thermocycling decreased the tensile bond strength of acrylic denture teeth to CAD/CAM denture base.","PeriodicalId":22324,"journal":{"name":"Tanta Dental Journal","volume":"2013 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanta Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_24_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study evaluated the effect of different surface treatments on tensile bond strength of acrylic denture teeth to prepolymerized computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) denture base resin (PMMA) under two different storage conditions. Patients and methods 160 test specimens were used in this study, each specimen has two parts: the first part: is an acrylic cross-linked maxillary central incisor denture tooth embedded in acrylic resin blocks, and the second part: is cone shape (5 mm × 5 mm × 3 mm) specimens prepared from prepolymerized PMMA discs by computer numerically controlled (CNC) milling machine under water cooling. Test specimens were divided into four main groups 40 each according to tooth surface treatment. Group I: no sandblasting. Group II: sandblasted using 50 μm aluminum oxide. Group III: sandblasted using 150 μm Al2O3. Group IV: sandblasted using 200 μm Al2O3. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups (A, B) 20 each, subgroup A used resin cement bond first part with the second part. Subgroup B used a bonding agent to bond the first part with the second part. Each subgroup was divided into 10 specimens that were stored in 50 hours of distilled water storage and 10 specimens were thermocycling. All specimens were then subjected to a tensile load using testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until debonding. The resulting debonding forces were recorded and statistically analyzed. For all specimens, the interface was inspected. The interface failures were classified into adhesive and cohesive failures. The data were analyzed using a three-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey's test. Results The highest mean value tensile bond strength was recorded for GIV (6.5 ± 1.46). Sandblasting was improving the tensile bond strength value of all the specimens. Bonding agents without and with surface treatment significantly improved the tensile bond strength of all specimens. The thermocycling significantly decreased the tensile bond strength of all specimens. Conclusion Sandblasting of denture teeth followed by bonding agent improved the tensile bond strength to CAD/CAM denture base. Thermocycling decreased the tensile bond strength of acrylic denture teeth to CAD/CAM denture base.
不同表面处理对丙烯酸义齿与CAD/CAM基托抗拉结合强度的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信