Jonathan Goldberg. Being of Two Minds: Modernist Literary Criticism and Early Modern Texts

Esther Osorio Whewell
{"title":"<scp>Jonathan Goldberg</scp>. <i>Being of Two Minds: Modernist Literary Criticism and Early Modern Texts</i>","authors":"Esther Osorio Whewell","doi":"10.1093/res/hgad006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jonathan Goldberg, who died shortly after the publication of this book, was chiefly known for creating critical dialogues between early modernity and post-modernism. The simplest premise for a book like Being of Two Minds is reception study; Goldberg’s book is not quite that, although it might be a kind of reception study squared or folded back on itself—an account, by an early modernist, of how three modernist critics (Eliot, Woolf, and Empson) wrote about using early modern literature to think with. Being of Two Minds is more of a how than a why kind of book, and more in the end about modernist than early modern writing, although Goldberg brings to bear a welcome familiarity with the poets who are his main subjects’ subjects (existing studies with overlapping interests, he notes, have been by modernism specialists, and primarily consisted in allusion-hunting). Perhaps its closest kin, mentioned several times in a book otherwise not over-entangled with recent criticism, is Helen Thaventhiran’s 2015 Radical Empiricists: Five Modernist Close Readers.","PeriodicalId":255318,"journal":{"name":"The Review of English Studies","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Review of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/res/hgad006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jonathan Goldberg, who died shortly after the publication of this book, was chiefly known for creating critical dialogues between early modernity and post-modernism. The simplest premise for a book like Being of Two Minds is reception study; Goldberg’s book is not quite that, although it might be a kind of reception study squared or folded back on itself—an account, by an early modernist, of how three modernist critics (Eliot, Woolf, and Empson) wrote about using early modern literature to think with. Being of Two Minds is more of a how than a why kind of book, and more in the end about modernist than early modern writing, although Goldberg brings to bear a welcome familiarity with the poets who are his main subjects’ subjects (existing studies with overlapping interests, he notes, have been by modernism specialists, and primarily consisted in allusion-hunting). Perhaps its closest kin, mentioned several times in a book otherwise not over-entangled with recent criticism, is Helen Thaventhiran’s 2015 Radical Empiricists: Five Modernist Close Readers.
乔纳森·戈德堡。两种思想的存在:现代主义文学批评与早期现代文本
乔纳森·戈德堡(Jonathan Goldberg)在本书出版后不久去世,他主要以在早期现代性和后现代主义之间建立批判性对话而闻名。写《三心二意》这样的书,最简单的前提是接受研究;戈德堡的书不完全是这样,尽管它可能是一种接受研究的方正或折叠——一个早期现代主义者的叙述,三位现代主义评论家(艾略特、伍尔夫和Empson)如何用早期现代文学来思考。《三心二意》更多的是关于“如何”而不是“为什么”的书,最后更多的是关于现代主义而不是早期现代写作,尽管戈德堡对诗人的熟悉程度令人欢迎,这些诗人是他的主要研究对象的研究对象(他指出,现有的研究有重叠的兴趣,是由现代主义专家进行的,主要是在寻找典故)。或许它最接近的同类是海伦·萨文蒂兰(Helen Thaventhiran)在2015年出版的《激进经验主义者:五位现代主义近距离读者》(Radical empiralists: Five Modernist Close Readers),这本书在一本没有过多卷入近期批评的书中被多次提及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信