Literary Works and the Metaphysics of Influence

IF 0.1 0 ART
Kari Hanson-Park
{"title":"Literary Works and the Metaphysics of Influence","authors":"Kari Hanson-Park","doi":"10.25038/am.v0i29.571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When interpreting literary works, interpreters almost always rely on connections between the literary works and other aspects of our world – e.g., historical time periods, cultures, other artworks, artistic movements, and so on. But how can we explain both the nature and role of these connections? I argue that this can be fruitfully explained with reference to relations that exist between literary works and other aspects of human culture, which is a class of relations that I call ‘interpretation-relevant relations.’ I also argue that an important component of these relations is a mind-independent connection of influence between the relata. Finally, I argue that these interpretation-relevant relations (with the component of influence) can be taken to be real, mind-independent elements of the world, if we recognize that literary works are public artifacts and so are part of the fabric of human culture, which depends on human minds for its existence and persistence but not for its ontological nature. All of this can hold even if interpretations are the products of individual minds interacting intentionally with literary works.","PeriodicalId":40461,"journal":{"name":"AM Journal of Art and Media Studies","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AM Journal of Art and Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i29.571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When interpreting literary works, interpreters almost always rely on connections between the literary works and other aspects of our world – e.g., historical time periods, cultures, other artworks, artistic movements, and so on. But how can we explain both the nature and role of these connections? I argue that this can be fruitfully explained with reference to relations that exist between literary works and other aspects of human culture, which is a class of relations that I call ‘interpretation-relevant relations.’ I also argue that an important component of these relations is a mind-independent connection of influence between the relata. Finally, I argue that these interpretation-relevant relations (with the component of influence) can be taken to be real, mind-independent elements of the world, if we recognize that literary works are public artifacts and so are part of the fabric of human culture, which depends on human minds for its existence and persistence but not for its ontological nature. All of this can hold even if interpretations are the products of individual minds interacting intentionally with literary works.
文学作品与影响的形而上学
在翻译文学作品时,口译员几乎总是依赖于文学作品与我们世界其他方面之间的联系——例如,历史时期、文化、其他艺术品、艺术运动等等。但是我们如何解释这些联系的性质和作用呢?我认为,参考文学作品与人类文化其他方面之间存在的关系,可以有效地解释这一点,我称之为“解释相关关系”。“我还认为,这些关系的一个重要组成部分是亲属之间不依赖于思维的影响联系。最后,我认为,如果我们认识到文学作品是公共文物,因此是人类文化结构的一部分,而人类文化的存在和持久性依赖于人类的思想,而不是其本体论性质,那么这些与解释相关的关系(包括影响的组成部分)可以被视为真实的、独立于思想的世界元素。所有这些都可以成立,即使解释是个人思想有意与文学作品互动的产物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信