Resetting the Ideological Clock: How the Russian-Ukrainian Issue Was Part of Bulgarian Discourse a Century Ago

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Roman Hadzhikosev
{"title":"Resetting the Ideological Clock: How the Russian-Ukrainian Issue Was Part of Bulgarian Discourse a Century Ago","authors":"Roman Hadzhikosev","doi":"10.37708/bf.swu.v32i3.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the discussion, which took place in Bulgaria shortly after the beginning of the First World War, between the Austrian deputy of Ukrainian origin Longin Tsechelski and Nikola Bobchev and Yaroslav Romanchuk. At the end of 1914, Tsechelsky arrived in Sofia to campaign for the support of the Ukrainian people in the struggle for independence publishing a pamphlet \"How Russia \"liberates\" Ukraine?\". It accuses Russia of having provoked the war by deceiving Serbia; of using pan-Slavic propaganda promulgating the idea of a single Slavic race; of denying Ukrainian nation the right to self-determination because it is conceived as being part and parcel of the Russian people; of not accepting Ukrainian language and Ukrainian literature as different from the Russian language and Russian literature but were instead considered to be their adjuncts, and some other similar arguments.Russophile circles in the country were immediately prompted to take action, which resulted in a response to Tsechelski with an article by Nikola Bobchev and a brochure by Romanchuk, a Ukrainian living and working in Bulgaria. Naturally, they try to refute the claims by using well-known arguments, talking about the liberating role that Russia played in fighting against Ottoman „slavery“, the Slav solidarity and the commercial interests of the West and more specifically of Austria during that historical moment. In the following year, a new answer followed in a book of more than a hundred pages by Tsechelski and another one by Romanchuk.","PeriodicalId":40507,"journal":{"name":"Balkanistic Forum","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balkanistic Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37708/bf.swu.v32i3.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the discussion, which took place in Bulgaria shortly after the beginning of the First World War, between the Austrian deputy of Ukrainian origin Longin Tsechelski and Nikola Bobchev and Yaroslav Romanchuk. At the end of 1914, Tsechelsky arrived in Sofia to campaign for the support of the Ukrainian people in the struggle for independence publishing a pamphlet "How Russia "liberates" Ukraine?". It accuses Russia of having provoked the war by deceiving Serbia; of using pan-Slavic propaganda promulgating the idea of a single Slavic race; of denying Ukrainian nation the right to self-determination because it is conceived as being part and parcel of the Russian people; of not accepting Ukrainian language and Ukrainian literature as different from the Russian language and Russian literature but were instead considered to be their adjuncts, and some other similar arguments.Russophile circles in the country were immediately prompted to take action, which resulted in a response to Tsechelski with an article by Nikola Bobchev and a brochure by Romanchuk, a Ukrainian living and working in Bulgaria. Naturally, they try to refute the claims by using well-known arguments, talking about the liberating role that Russia played in fighting against Ottoman „slavery“, the Slav solidarity and the commercial interests of the West and more specifically of Austria during that historical moment. In the following year, a new answer followed in a book of more than a hundred pages by Tsechelski and another one by Romanchuk.
重置意识形态时钟:一个世纪前俄乌问题如何成为保加利亚话语的一部分
本文考察了第一次世界大战开始后不久在保加利亚发生的讨论,讨论的双方是乌克兰裔的奥地利议员朗金·切切尔斯基、尼古拉·博切夫和雅罗斯拉夫·罗曼丘克。1914年底,切切尔斯基抵达索非亚,为支持乌克兰人民争取独立的斗争而开展活动,出版了一本小册子《俄罗斯如何解放“乌克兰?”》。它指责俄罗斯通过欺骗塞尔维亚挑起了战争;利用泛斯拉夫宣传宣传单一斯拉夫种族的观念;剥夺乌克兰民族的自决权,因为它被认为是俄罗斯人民不可分割的一部分;不接受乌克兰语言和乌克兰文学不同于俄语和俄罗斯文学,而是被认为是它们的附属物,以及其他类似的论点。该国亲俄派立即采取行动,尼古拉·博切夫(Nikola Bobchev)写了一篇文章,罗曼查克(Romanchuk)写了一本小册子回应了切切尔斯基,罗曼查克是一名生活和工作在保加利亚的乌克兰人。当然,他们试图用众所周知的论点来反驳这些说法,谈论俄罗斯在反对奥斯曼“奴隶制”的战斗中发挥的解放作用,斯拉夫人的团结以及西方的商业利益,特别是在那个历史时刻奥地利的商业利益。在接下来的一年里,切切尔斯基和罗曼丘克在一本一百多页的书中给出了新的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Balkanistic Forum
Balkanistic Forum HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: "Balkanistic Forum" is published since 1992 as a yearly edition of the “Seminar for Balkan Studies and Specialization” to the South-Western University “Neofyt Rilski” Blagoevgrad. Since 1995 it is published in thematic issues -3 issues per year. The main task of the Journal is to provide free forum for discussing important historical and present problems of the Balkans in European and wider context. It is designed as an interdisciplinary journal uniting the efforts of specialists in History, Sociology, Literature, Anthropology, Linguistics, Culture Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信