Situationally Appropriate Leadership Styles and Team Performance: Is Trust Really Important

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"Situationally Appropriate Leadership Styles and Team Performance: Is Trust Really Important","authors":"","doi":"10.51709/19951272/fall2023/10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine the impact of shared leadership and emergent leadership on team performance, with the moderating role of trust by employing Adaptive theory. To understand this, we conducted a cross-sectional study. Rooted within positivist philosophy, we employed quantitative method. Data was collected via questionnaire from 252 individuals from software and IT sector employees of Pakistan. Sample adequacy tests were applied before conducting multi-variate analysis. Using SPSS, we ran regression analysis and process macro for moderation analysis. The Harman test is applied to enquire about any existence of common method biases. Findings indicate that shared and emergent leadership are the key drivers of agile team performance. When leadership functions as a team process, it instills a sense of collective identity, increasing engagement and yield enhanced levels of team performance. Moreover, trust did not moderate the relationship between leadership styles and team performance. This study enhances our understanding of the differences between the interchangeably used leadership styles and their contribution to team performance in a digital setting","PeriodicalId":43392,"journal":{"name":"FWU Journal of Social Sciences","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FWU Journal of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/fall2023/10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to examine the impact of shared leadership and emergent leadership on team performance, with the moderating role of trust by employing Adaptive theory. To understand this, we conducted a cross-sectional study. Rooted within positivist philosophy, we employed quantitative method. Data was collected via questionnaire from 252 individuals from software and IT sector employees of Pakistan. Sample adequacy tests were applied before conducting multi-variate analysis. Using SPSS, we ran regression analysis and process macro for moderation analysis. The Harman test is applied to enquire about any existence of common method biases. Findings indicate that shared and emergent leadership are the key drivers of agile team performance. When leadership functions as a team process, it instills a sense of collective identity, increasing engagement and yield enhanced levels of team performance. Moreover, trust did not moderate the relationship between leadership styles and team performance. This study enhances our understanding of the differences between the interchangeably used leadership styles and their contribution to team performance in a digital setting
情境适宜的领导风格和团队表现:信任真的重要吗
本研究旨在运用自适应理论探讨共享型领导和应急型领导对团队绩效的影响,以及信任的调节作用。为了理解这一点,我们进行了一项横断面研究。基于实证主义哲学,我们采用了定量方法。数据是通过调查问卷从巴基斯坦软件和IT部门的252名员工中收集的。在进行多变量分析之前,进行了样本充分性测试。运用SPSS进行回归分析,并运用过程宏进行适度分析。哈曼检验用于询问是否存在共同方法偏差。研究结果表明,共享型和紧急型领导是敏捷团队绩效的关键驱动因素。当领导作为一个团队过程发挥作用时,它会灌输一种集体认同感,增加参与度,并提高团队绩效水平。此外,信任并没有调节领导风格与团队绩效之间的关系。本研究增强了我们对数字化环境下交替使用的领导风格及其对团队绩效贡献之间差异的理解
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FWU Journal of Social Sciences
FWU Journal of Social Sciences SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
57.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信