Professional Certification of Higher Education in Germany and Its Implications for Cross Disciplinary Evaluation in China

Qi CHEN, Yuting SHI, Jingwei XU
{"title":"Professional Certification of Higher Education in Germany and Its Implications for Cross Disciplinary Evaluation in China","authors":"Qi CHEN, Yuting SHI, Jingwei XU","doi":"10.53789/j.1653-0465.2023.0303.018.p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the development of the German higher education certification system, its certification standards and procedures are also improving day by day. In this context, a large number of institutions have emerged that provide certification services for higher education. This article mainly focuses on two cross-disciplinary certification bodies, the Professional Accreditation and Quality Assurance Agency (AQAS) and the Certification and Quality Assurance Institute (ACQUIN), to analyze the commonalities and differences between the two certification bodies from the perspectives of standard formulation and expert review. The results indicate that in terms of standard formulation, ACQUIN emphasizes the improvement of the quality system of the profession itself, while AQAS focuses on the positioning and characteristics of a certain profession in relevant industry fields. In terms of expert evaluation, ACQUIN and AQAS have different focuses on ensuring program fairness and expert selection. ACQUIN values the evaluation ability of experts, while AQAS places greater emphasis on their academic background.","PeriodicalId":492278,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of humanities and social sciences","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of humanities and social sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53789/j.1653-0465.2023.0303.018.p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the development of the German higher education certification system, its certification standards and procedures are also improving day by day. In this context, a large number of institutions have emerged that provide certification services for higher education. This article mainly focuses on two cross-disciplinary certification bodies, the Professional Accreditation and Quality Assurance Agency (AQAS) and the Certification and Quality Assurance Institute (ACQUIN), to analyze the commonalities and differences between the two certification bodies from the perspectives of standard formulation and expert review. The results indicate that in terms of standard formulation, ACQUIN emphasizes the improvement of the quality system of the profession itself, while AQAS focuses on the positioning and characteristics of a certain profession in relevant industry fields. In terms of expert evaluation, ACQUIN and AQAS have different focuses on ensuring program fairness and expert selection. ACQUIN values the evaluation ability of experts, while AQAS places greater emphasis on their academic background.
德国高等教育职业认证及其对中国跨学科评估的启示
随着德国高等教育认证制度的发展,其认证标准和程序也日益完善。在此背景下,涌现了一大批为高等教育提供认证服务的机构。本文主要以专业认可与质量保证机构(AQAS)和认证与质量保证研究所(ACQUIN)这两个跨学科认证机构为研究对象,从标准制定和专家评审的角度分析这两个认证机构之间的共性和差异。结果表明,在标准制定上,ACQUIN强调的是行业本身质量体系的完善,而AQAS注重的是某一行业在相关行业领域的定位和特点。在专家评价方面,ACQUIN和AQAS在确保项目公平性和专家选择方面有不同的侧重点。ACQUIN更看重专家的评价能力,而AQAS更看重专家的学术背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信