Not So Ambitious? Indonesia’s Coal Dependence Amidst The Era of Energy Transition

Amira Hasna Febriyanti, Sayyid Al Murtadho, Yassriani Almattushyva
{"title":"Not So Ambitious? Indonesia’s Coal Dependence Amidst The Era of Energy Transition","authors":"Amira Hasna Febriyanti, Sayyid Al Murtadho, Yassriani Almattushyva","doi":"10.22146/globalsouth.81488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia ratified the Paris Agreement to combat climate change and pledged to reduce its carbon emissions. This commitment, however, contrasts Indonesia's development plan under Joko Widodo's administration. His policy has enabled the development of additional power plants, hence perpetuating Indonesia's reliance on coal. Thus, it is essential to examine why Indonesia is still struggling to break free from its dependence on coal, despite its ambitious goal to tackle climate change. This paper will apply the Copenhagen School's securitisation theory to explore how security is defined and shapes Indonesia's energy transition process. Furthermore, this research will use distributive and procedural justice theory to examine the decision-making process and climate change policy implementation. In order to accomplish so, we will employ qualitative methods such as desk studies, which will comprise academic literature as well as government statements and regulations. This paper argues that Indonesia's energy transition is impeded by how other security issues are prioritised above climate change. In addition, the lack of justice principles in the climate policy formulation and implementation has contributed to Indonesia's reliance on coal. Since Indonesia is the world's largest coal exporter and one of the top ten global polluters, this study intends to contribute to identifying challenges in the transition to renewable energy.Keywords: Indonesia; coal dependence; energy transition; securitisation; distributive and procedural justice","PeriodicalId":480500,"journal":{"name":"Global South Review","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global South Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/globalsouth.81488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indonesia ratified the Paris Agreement to combat climate change and pledged to reduce its carbon emissions. This commitment, however, contrasts Indonesia's development plan under Joko Widodo's administration. His policy has enabled the development of additional power plants, hence perpetuating Indonesia's reliance on coal. Thus, it is essential to examine why Indonesia is still struggling to break free from its dependence on coal, despite its ambitious goal to tackle climate change. This paper will apply the Copenhagen School's securitisation theory to explore how security is defined and shapes Indonesia's energy transition process. Furthermore, this research will use distributive and procedural justice theory to examine the decision-making process and climate change policy implementation. In order to accomplish so, we will employ qualitative methods such as desk studies, which will comprise academic literature as well as government statements and regulations. This paper argues that Indonesia's energy transition is impeded by how other security issues are prioritised above climate change. In addition, the lack of justice principles in the climate policy formulation and implementation has contributed to Indonesia's reliance on coal. Since Indonesia is the world's largest coal exporter and one of the top ten global polluters, this study intends to contribute to identifying challenges in the transition to renewable energy.Keywords: Indonesia; coal dependence; energy transition; securitisation; distributive and procedural justice
不那么雄心勃勃?能源转型时代印尼对煤炭的依赖
印度尼西亚批准了应对气候变化的《巴黎协定》,并承诺减少碳排放。然而,这一承诺与佐科•维多多(Joko Widodo)政府领导下的印尼发展计划形成了鲜明对比。他的政策使更多的发电厂得以发展,从而使印尼对煤炭的依赖永久化。因此,有必要研究一下,尽管印尼制定了应对气候变化的宏伟目标,但它为何仍在努力摆脱对煤炭的依赖。本文将运用哥本哈根学派的证券化理论来探讨安全是如何定义和塑造印度尼西亚的能源转型过程的。此外,本研究将运用分配正义与程序正义理论检视决策过程与气候变迁政策执行。为了做到这一点,我们将采用定性的方法,如案头研究,其中包括学术文献以及政府声明和法规。本文认为,印尼的能源转型受到其他安全问题优先于气候变化的阻碍。此外,气候政策制定和实施中缺乏公正原则也导致印尼对煤炭的依赖。由于印度尼西亚是世界上最大的煤炭出口国,也是全球十大污染国之一,本研究旨在为确定向可再生能源过渡的挑战做出贡献。关键词:印尼;煤炭的依赖;能源转换;资产证券化;分配和程序公正
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信