The process of mathematics students’ reflective abstraction in solving continuous random variable problems in the probability course

Q2 Social Sciences
Arfatin Nurrahmah, None Kartono, None Zaenuri, None Isnarto
{"title":"The process of mathematics students’ reflective abstraction in solving continuous random variable problems in the probability course","authors":"Arfatin Nurrahmah, None Kartono, None Zaenuri, None Isnarto","doi":"10.18488/61.v11i4.3497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reflective abstraction is a mental mechanism in mental constructs in which all the structures of mathematical logic are developed in the mind of the individual. The mental mechanisms in question are interiorization, coordination, reversal, encapsulation, and generalization. This research is classified as exploratory research with a qualitative descriptive approach. This research data was taken from three fifth-semester mathematics students. The instruments used in this study were researchers as key instruments, essay tests, and interview guidelines. Data analysis included: 1) preparing the data for analysis, 2) reading the entire data, 3) encoding the data, 4) describing the data and presenting it in the narrative, and 5) interpreting the data and testing the validity of the data using data triangulation. The research found that (1) The first participant went through four components of reflective abstraction: interiorization – coordination – encapsulation – generalization. (2) The second participant went through five components of reflective abstraction thinking namely interiorization – coordination – reversal – encapsulation – generalization. (3) The third participant failed to solve the problem because the thought process in his mental mechanism had not yet manifested coordination, encapsulation, and generalization. Researchers found that the mental construction that the first participant had gone through could illustrate that the minimum mental construction that must be passed in solving the problem of continuous random variables required components- interiorization, coordination, encapsulation, and generalization.","PeriodicalId":37226,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education and Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v11i4.3497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reflective abstraction is a mental mechanism in mental constructs in which all the structures of mathematical logic are developed in the mind of the individual. The mental mechanisms in question are interiorization, coordination, reversal, encapsulation, and generalization. This research is classified as exploratory research with a qualitative descriptive approach. This research data was taken from three fifth-semester mathematics students. The instruments used in this study were researchers as key instruments, essay tests, and interview guidelines. Data analysis included: 1) preparing the data for analysis, 2) reading the entire data, 3) encoding the data, 4) describing the data and presenting it in the narrative, and 5) interpreting the data and testing the validity of the data using data triangulation. The research found that (1) The first participant went through four components of reflective abstraction: interiorization – coordination – encapsulation – generalization. (2) The second participant went through five components of reflective abstraction thinking namely interiorization – coordination – reversal – encapsulation – generalization. (3) The third participant failed to solve the problem because the thought process in his mental mechanism had not yet manifested coordination, encapsulation, and generalization. Researchers found that the mental construction that the first participant had gone through could illustrate that the minimum mental construction that must be passed in solving the problem of continuous random variables required components- interiorization, coordination, encapsulation, and generalization.
数学学生在概率论课程中解决连续随机变量问题的反思性抽象过程
反思性抽象是心理构造中的一种心理机制,在这种心理构造中,数学逻辑的所有结构都是在个体的头脑中发展起来的。所讨论的心理机制是内部化、协调、反转、封装和泛化。本研究被归类为探索性研究,采用定性描述方法。本研究数据取自三名五学期数学专业学生。本研究使用的工具是研究人员作为主要工具,论文测试和访谈指南。数据分析包括:1)准备用于分析的数据,2)读取整个数据,3)对数据进行编码,4)描述数据并在叙述中呈现,5)解释数据并使用数据三角测量测试数据的有效性。研究发现:(1)第一个参与者经历了反思抽象的四个组成部分:内部化-协调-封装-概括。(2)第二个被试经历了反思性抽象思维的五个组成部分,即内化-协调-反转-封装-概括。(3)第三位被试未能解决问题的原因是其心理机制中的思维过程尚未表现出协调性、封装性和泛化性。研究人员发现,第一个参与者所经历的心理构造可以说明,在解决连续随机变量问题时必须通过的最小心理构造需要内化、协调、封装和概括等组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信