Review and synthesis of expert perspectives on user attribute and profile definitions for fashion recommendation

IF 1.9 Q3 BUSINESS
B. Dahunsi, H. Woelfle, N. Gagliardi, L. E. Dunne
{"title":"Review and synthesis of expert perspectives on user attribute and profile definitions for fashion recommendation","authors":"B. Dahunsi, H. Woelfle, N. Gagliardi, L. E. Dunne","doi":"10.1080/17543266.2023.2261228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTA key obstacle in personalised fashion recommendations is the challenge of capturing user physical attributes at a large scale, which limits exclusively computational methods (like machine learning) to readily available attributes whose influence on recommendation accuracy is variable. Expert advice is a potential means of identifying influential user attributes. However, individual experts often disagree or offer conflicting advice. Thus, identifying areas where expert advice is or isn't consistent, in the context of user attributes and profiling is critical. Here, we characterise the breadth of expert definitions of user attributes and profiles through an exhaustive assessment of 156 years of advice literature. Expert definitions of body colouring, shape, and personality attributes are extracted and compared. The range of attribute-value relationships and profile definitions in each domain is described, and coherence among authors for each domain is discussed.KEYWORDS: Fashion recommendationclothing recommendationfashion advicefeature engineeringuser profiles Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by University of Minnesota Sustainable Development Goals Initiative.; US National Science Foundation: [grant number #1715200].","PeriodicalId":39443,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2023.2261228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTA key obstacle in personalised fashion recommendations is the challenge of capturing user physical attributes at a large scale, which limits exclusively computational methods (like machine learning) to readily available attributes whose influence on recommendation accuracy is variable. Expert advice is a potential means of identifying influential user attributes. However, individual experts often disagree or offer conflicting advice. Thus, identifying areas where expert advice is or isn't consistent, in the context of user attributes and profiling is critical. Here, we characterise the breadth of expert definitions of user attributes and profiles through an exhaustive assessment of 156 years of advice literature. Expert definitions of body colouring, shape, and personality attributes are extracted and compared. The range of attribute-value relationships and profile definitions in each domain is described, and coherence among authors for each domain is discussed.KEYWORDS: Fashion recommendationclothing recommendationfashion advicefeature engineeringuser profiles Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by University of Minnesota Sustainable Development Goals Initiative.; US National Science Foundation: [grant number #1715200].
时尚推荐中用户属性和个人资料定义的专家观点综述与综合
个性化时尚推荐的关键障碍是大规模捕获用户物理属性的挑战,这限制了专门的计算方法(如机器学习),这些方法对推荐准确性的影响是可变的。专家意见是识别有影响力的用户属性的潜在手段。然而,个别专家往往不同意或提供相互矛盾的建议。因此,在用户属性和分析的上下文中,确定专家建议一致或不一致的领域是至关重要的。在这里,我们通过对156年的建议文献的详尽评估,描述了专家对用户属性和配置文件定义的广度。提取并比较专家对身体颜色、形状和个性属性的定义。描述了每个领域的属性值关系和概要定义的范围,并讨论了每个领域作者之间的一致性。关键词:时尚推荐、服装推荐、时尚建议、特征工程、用户档案披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。本研究得到明尼苏达大学可持续发展目标倡议组织的支持。美国国家科学基金会:[批准号#1715200]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education
International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信