Computer-based assessment in mathematics

Q3 Social Sciences
LUMAT Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.31129/lumat.11.3.1877
Anneli Dyrvold, Ida Bergvall
{"title":"Computer-based assessment in mathematics","authors":"Anneli Dyrvold, Ida Bergvall","doi":"10.31129/lumat.11.3.1877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computer-based assessments is becoming more and more common in mathematics education, and because the digital media entails other demands than paper-based tests, potential threats against validity must be considered. In this study we investigate how preparatory instructions and digital familiarity, may be of importance for test validity. 77 lower secondary students participated in the study and were divided into two groups that received different instructions about five different types of dynamic and/or interactive functions in digital mathematics items. One group received a verbal and visual instruction, whereas the other group also got the opportunity to try using the functions themselves. The students were monitored using eye-tracking equipment during their work with mathematics items with the five types of functions. The result revealed differences in how the students undertook the dynamic functions due to the students’ preparatory instructions. One conclusion is that students need to be very familiar with dynamic and interactive functions in tests, if validity is to be ensured. The validity also depends on the type of dynamic function used.","PeriodicalId":36856,"journal":{"name":"LUMAT","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LUMAT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.11.3.1877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computer-based assessments is becoming more and more common in mathematics education, and because the digital media entails other demands than paper-based tests, potential threats against validity must be considered. In this study we investigate how preparatory instructions and digital familiarity, may be of importance for test validity. 77 lower secondary students participated in the study and were divided into two groups that received different instructions about five different types of dynamic and/or interactive functions in digital mathematics items. One group received a verbal and visual instruction, whereas the other group also got the opportunity to try using the functions themselves. The students were monitored using eye-tracking equipment during their work with mathematics items with the five types of functions. The result revealed differences in how the students undertook the dynamic functions due to the students’ preparatory instructions. One conclusion is that students need to be very familiar with dynamic and interactive functions in tests, if validity is to be ensured. The validity also depends on the type of dynamic function used.
基于计算机的数学评估
基于计算机的评估在数学教育中变得越来越普遍,由于数字媒体带来了比纸质测试更多的需求,因此必须考虑到对有效性的潜在威胁。在这项研究中,我们探讨了准备说明和数字熟悉度对测试效度的重要性。77名低年级学生参与了这项研究,他们被分为两组,分别接受关于数字数学项目中五种不同类型的动态和/或互动功能的不同指导。一组接受口头和视觉指导,而另一组也有机会自己尝试使用这些功能。研究人员使用眼动追踪设备来监测学生们在处理五种函数类型的数学题时的表现。结果显示,由于学生的预备指导,学生在执行动态功能方面存在差异。一个结论是,如果要确保测试的有效性,学生需要非常熟悉测试中的动态和交互功能。有效性还取决于所使用的动态函数的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
LUMAT
LUMAT Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信