Grain-size variability in debris flows of different runout lengths, Wenchuan, China

IF 3.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Erin L. Harvey, Tristram C. Hales, Jie Liu, Daniel E.J. Hobley, Fan Yang, Bing Xia, Xuanmei Fan
{"title":"Grain-size variability in debris flows of different runout lengths, Wenchuan, China","authors":"Erin L. Harvey, Tristram C. Hales, Jie Liu, Daniel E.J. Hobley, Fan Yang, Bing Xia, Xuanmei Fan","doi":"10.1130/b37027.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Debris-flow grain-size distributions (GSDs) control runout length and mobility. Wide, bimodal GSDs and those containing a higher proportion of silt and clay have been shown experimentally to increase runout length. However, the relationship between grain size and mobility has not been well established in field conditions. Here, we compared the grain-size characteristics of two debris flows with considerably different runout lengths (1.5 km vs. 8 km) to understand the role of grain size in governing runout. The two debris flows were triggered in the same rainfall event from coseismic landslide debris generated in the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in catchments with similar lithology and topography. We compared the deposited GSDs and their spatial patterns using our rare, three-dimensional GSD datasets. Surprisingly, the proportions of each size fraction deposited by the two flows were statistically indistinguishable. The spatial pattern of grain size differed between the two flows, with evidence of inverse grading only preserved in the smaller deposit. From these observations, we can infer that the GSDs of both flows were determined by the coseismic landslide source material, and that there was little difference in the GSDs of material entrained as the flows bulked. The contrasting spatial distributions of grains indicated that different internal processes were dominant within the two flows. These findings demonstrate that where GSDs are dominated by coarse grains and are governed by similar source conditions, grain size plays a lesser role relative to sediment supply and hydrology in controlling the runout length of large catastrophic post-earthquake debris flows.","PeriodicalId":55104,"journal":{"name":"Geological Society of America Bulletin","volume":"171 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Society of America Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/b37027.1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Debris-flow grain-size distributions (GSDs) control runout length and mobility. Wide, bimodal GSDs and those containing a higher proportion of silt and clay have been shown experimentally to increase runout length. However, the relationship between grain size and mobility has not been well established in field conditions. Here, we compared the grain-size characteristics of two debris flows with considerably different runout lengths (1.5 km vs. 8 km) to understand the role of grain size in governing runout. The two debris flows were triggered in the same rainfall event from coseismic landslide debris generated in the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in catchments with similar lithology and topography. We compared the deposited GSDs and their spatial patterns using our rare, three-dimensional GSD datasets. Surprisingly, the proportions of each size fraction deposited by the two flows were statistically indistinguishable. The spatial pattern of grain size differed between the two flows, with evidence of inverse grading only preserved in the smaller deposit. From these observations, we can infer that the GSDs of both flows were determined by the coseismic landslide source material, and that there was little difference in the GSDs of material entrained as the flows bulked. The contrasting spatial distributions of grains indicated that different internal processes were dominant within the two flows. These findings demonstrate that where GSDs are dominated by coarse grains and are governed by similar source conditions, grain size plays a lesser role relative to sediment supply and hydrology in controlling the runout length of large catastrophic post-earthquake debris flows.
中国汶川不同跳动长度泥石流的粒度变异性
泥石流粒度分布(gsd)控制跳动长度和流动性。实验表明,宽的双峰gsd和含有较高比例的粉土和粘土的gsd可以增加跳动长度。然而,在田间条件下,晶粒尺寸与迁移率之间的关系尚未得到很好的确立。在这里,我们比较了两种不同跳动长度(1.5 km和8 km)的泥石流的粒度特征,以了解粒度在控制跳动中的作用。这两次泥石流是在同一降雨事件下由2008年汶川地震同震滑坡碎屑在岩性和地形相似的集水区引发的。我们使用罕见的三维GSD数据集比较了沉积的GSD及其空间格局。令人惊讶的是,两股水流沉积的每一种粒径的比例在统计上是无法区分的。两种流体的粒度空间格局存在差异,仅在较小的沉积物中存在逆级配的证据。从这些观测结果中,我们可以推断,两个流的gsd是由同震滑坡源物质决定的,并且随着流的膨胀,携带的物质的gsd几乎没有差异。颗粒空间分布的差异表明,不同的内部过程在两个流动中占主导地位。这些结果表明,在以粗颗粒为主、源区条件相似的地区,相对于泥沙供应和水文条件,粒径对震后大灾变泥石流跳动长度的控制作用较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geological Society of America Bulletin
Geological Society of America Bulletin 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
159
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The GSA Bulletin is the Society''s premier scholarly journal, published continuously since 1890. Its first editor was William John (WJ) McGee, who was responsible for establishing much of its original style and format. Fully refereed, each bimonthly issue includes 16-20 papers focusing on the most definitive, timely, and classic-style research in all earth-science disciplines. The Bulletin welcomes most contributions that are data-rich, mature studies of broad interest (i.e., of interest to more than one sub-discipline of earth science) and of lasting, archival quality. These include (but are not limited to) studies related to tectonics, structural geology, geochemistry, geophysics, hydrogeology, marine geology, paleoclimatology, planetary geology, quaternary geology/geomorphology, sedimentary geology, stratigraphy, and volcanology. The journal is committed to further developing both the scope of its content and its international profile so that it publishes the most current earth science research that will be of wide interest to geoscientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信