AKURASI PENILAIAN SERANGAN Thrips sp. PADA DAUN CABAI BERDASARKAN PENGAMATAN VISUAL DAN PENGOLAHAN CITRA

NOFI SUWETI, ASMAR HASAN, RAHAYU MALLARANGENG, LA ODE SANTIAJI BANDE, WAODE SITI ANIMA HISEIN, TERRY PAKKI
{"title":"AKURASI PENILAIAN SERANGAN Thrips sp. PADA DAUN CABAI BERDASARKAN PENGAMATAN VISUAL DAN PENGOLAHAN CITRA","authors":"NOFI SUWETI, ASMAR HASAN, RAHAYU MALLARANGENG, LA ODE SANTIAJI BANDE, WAODE SITI ANIMA HISEIN, TERRY PAKKI","doi":"10.56189/jagris.v3i2.43338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Visual observation is a method of assessing the intensity of thrips infestation that assessors favor because it is relatively easy to apply. However, on the other hand, it has many limitations. Therefore, a more accurate alternative method, such as digital image processing, is needed. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of visual observation and digital image processing used to assess the thrips attack on cayenne pepper leaves. This study was designed following a Randomized Group Design with four treatments, namely P1 (1), P2 (3), P3 (5), and P4 (7 thrips/container cup). Each treatment was repeated three times (12 experimental units), and each experimental unit used five test leaves. The variable observed was the accuracy of assessing thrips attack intensity on chili leaves based on visual observation and image processing. The results show that high thrips populations can cause high attack intensity on chili plants based on visual observation results, while based on image processing, it is known that high thrips populations do not necessarily cause high attack intensity. The assessment of attack intensity based on visual observation provides a lower accuracy level than image processing. The results of the assessment of attack intensity based on visual observations are less reliable because there is a bias of 0.67.","PeriodicalId":263766,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Berkala Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian (Journal of Agricultural Sciences)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Berkala Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian (Journal of Agricultural Sciences)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56189/jagris.v3i2.43338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual observation is a method of assessing the intensity of thrips infestation that assessors favor because it is relatively easy to apply. However, on the other hand, it has many limitations. Therefore, a more accurate alternative method, such as digital image processing, is needed. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of visual observation and digital image processing used to assess the thrips attack on cayenne pepper leaves. This study was designed following a Randomized Group Design with four treatments, namely P1 (1), P2 (3), P3 (5), and P4 (7 thrips/container cup). Each treatment was repeated three times (12 experimental units), and each experimental unit used five test leaves. The variable observed was the accuracy of assessing thrips attack intensity on chili leaves based on visual observation and image processing. The results show that high thrips populations can cause high attack intensity on chili plants based on visual observation results, while based on image processing, it is known that high thrips populations do not necessarily cause high attack intensity. The assessment of attack intensity based on visual observation provides a lower accuracy level than image processing. The results of the assessment of attack intensity based on visual observations are less reliable because there is a bias of 0.67.
根据视觉观察和图像处理,sp对辣椒叶刺痛性攻击的准确评估
目视观察是一种评估蓟马侵扰程度的方法,评估人员喜欢这种方法,因为它相对容易应用。然而,另一方面,它也有许多局限性。因此,需要一种更精确的替代方法,如数字图像处理。本研究的目的是评估视觉观察和数字图像处理用于评估蓟马对辣椒叶片的攻击的准确性。本研究采用随机分组设计,分为P1(1)、P2(3)、P3(5)和P4(7只蓟马/容器杯)4个处理。每个处理重复3次(12个试验单位),每个试验单位使用5片试验叶片。观察到的变量是基于视觉观察和图像处理的蓟马对辣椒叶片攻击强度评估的准确性。结果表明,从目视观察结果来看,高蓟马种群对辣椒植株的攻击强度较高,但从图像处理结果来看,高蓟马种群对辣椒植株的攻击强度并不一定高。基于视觉观察的攻击强度评估精度低于图像处理。基于视觉观察的攻击强度评估结果不太可靠,因为存在0.67的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信