Comparison of Different Supervised Classification Algorithms for Mapping Paddy Rice Areas Using Landsat 9 Imageries

Melis İNALPULAT
{"title":"Comparison of Different Supervised Classification Algorithms for Mapping Paddy Rice Areas Using Landsat 9 Imageries","authors":"Melis İNALPULAT","doi":"10.46810/tdfd.1266393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rice is known to be one of the most essential crops in Turkey, as well as many other countries especially in Asia, whereas paddy rice cropping systems have a key role in many processes ranging from human nutrition to environment-related perspectives. Therefore, determination of cultivation area is still a hot topic among researchers from various disciplines, planners, and decision makers. In present study, it was aimed to evaluate performances of three classifications algorithms among most widely used ones, namely, maximum likelihood (ML), random forest (RF), and k-nearest neighborhood (KNN), for paddy rice mapping in a mixed cultivation area located in Biga District of Çanakkale Province, Turkey. Visual, near-infrared and shortwave infrared bands of Landsat 9 acquired in dry season of 2022 year was utilized. The classification scheme included six classes as dense vegetation (D), sparse vegetation (S), agricultural field (A), water surface (W), residential area – base soil (RB), and paddy rice (PR). The performances were tested using the same training samples and accuracy control points. The reliability of each classification was evaluated through accuracy assessments considering 150 equalized randomized control points. Accordingly, RF algorithym could identify PR areas with over 96.0% accuracy, and it was followed by KNN with 92.0%.","PeriodicalId":489750,"journal":{"name":"Türk doğa ve fen dergisi","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Türk doğa ve fen dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46810/tdfd.1266393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rice is known to be one of the most essential crops in Turkey, as well as many other countries especially in Asia, whereas paddy rice cropping systems have a key role in many processes ranging from human nutrition to environment-related perspectives. Therefore, determination of cultivation area is still a hot topic among researchers from various disciplines, planners, and decision makers. In present study, it was aimed to evaluate performances of three classifications algorithms among most widely used ones, namely, maximum likelihood (ML), random forest (RF), and k-nearest neighborhood (KNN), for paddy rice mapping in a mixed cultivation area located in Biga District of Çanakkale Province, Turkey. Visual, near-infrared and shortwave infrared bands of Landsat 9 acquired in dry season of 2022 year was utilized. The classification scheme included six classes as dense vegetation (D), sparse vegetation (S), agricultural field (A), water surface (W), residential area – base soil (RB), and paddy rice (PR). The performances were tested using the same training samples and accuracy control points. The reliability of each classification was evaluated through accuracy assessments considering 150 equalized randomized control points. Accordingly, RF algorithym could identify PR areas with over 96.0% accuracy, and it was followed by KNN with 92.0%.
不同监督分类算法在Landsat 9影像水稻区域制图中的比较
众所周知,在土耳其以及许多其他国家,特别是亚洲国家,水稻是最重要的作物之一,而水稻种植系统在从人类营养到与环境相关的许多过程中都发挥着关键作用。因此,耕地面积的确定仍然是各学科研究者、规划者和决策者关注的热点问题。本研究旨在评估最大似然(ML)、随机森林(RF)和k近邻(KNN)这三种最常用的分类算法在土耳其Çanakkale省Biga区混合种植区水稻作图中的性能。利用Landsat 9在2022年旱季获取的可见光、近红外和短波红外波段。分类方案包括植被密集(D)、植被稀疏(S)、农田(A)、水面(W)、居民区基础土壤(RB)和水稻(PR) 6类。使用相同的训练样本和精度控制点对性能进行测试。通过考虑150个均衡随机控制点的准确性评估来评估每种分类的可靠性。因此,RF算法识别PR区域的准确率超过96.0%,其次是KNN算法,准确率为92.0%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信