{"title":"Where Will Gabapentin’s Bumpy Road Lead us? A Narrative Review of Pediatric Perioperative Gabapentinoids","authors":"Galaxy Li, Pulsar Li","doi":"10.1007/s40140-023-00579-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose of Review Gabapentinoids, including gabapentin and pregabalin, have been commonly administered in the perioperative period since opioid-sparing effects were found in adults in the early 2000s. This review examines the current evidence for and against the perioperative use of gabapentinoids in children and identifies potential future directions for research. Recent Findings Many factors led to increasing use of gabapentinoids for surgical patients. The national opioid epidemic hastened the move toward the use of multimodal analgesia and early recovery after surgery protocols for both adults and children. However, subsequent adult studies have found less benefit in postoperative pain reduction than once thought, while others have investigated substantial adverse side effects. The most convincing data supporting the use of pediatric perioperative gabapentinoids show reductions in emergence agitation, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and chronic persistent surgical pain. Summary As adult trials of perioperative gabapentinoids show decreasing benefits in postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) amidst increasing concerns of adverse side effects, benefits for children focus more on reduction in emergence agitation, PONV, and chronic postsurgical pain with more research needed to explore optimal dosing regimens and potential adverse side effects.","PeriodicalId":36608,"journal":{"name":"Current Anesthesiology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Anesthesiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-023-00579-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Purpose of Review Gabapentinoids, including gabapentin and pregabalin, have been commonly administered in the perioperative period since opioid-sparing effects were found in adults in the early 2000s. This review examines the current evidence for and against the perioperative use of gabapentinoids in children and identifies potential future directions for research. Recent Findings Many factors led to increasing use of gabapentinoids for surgical patients. The national opioid epidemic hastened the move toward the use of multimodal analgesia and early recovery after surgery protocols for both adults and children. However, subsequent adult studies have found less benefit in postoperative pain reduction than once thought, while others have investigated substantial adverse side effects. The most convincing data supporting the use of pediatric perioperative gabapentinoids show reductions in emergence agitation, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and chronic persistent surgical pain. Summary As adult trials of perioperative gabapentinoids show decreasing benefits in postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) amidst increasing concerns of adverse side effects, benefits for children focus more on reduction in emergence agitation, PONV, and chronic postsurgical pain with more research needed to explore optimal dosing regimens and potential adverse side effects.
期刊介绍:
This journal aims to offer expert review articles on the most significant recent developments in the field of anesthesiology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions, the journal intends to serve those involved in the delivery of anesthesia for surgical and medical procedures, treatment of acute and chronic pain conditions, perioperative management for operative and intensive care unit patients, and associated basic science and clinical research efforts in their areas. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas across the field. Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An Editorial Board of more than 20 internationally diverse members reviews the annual table of contents, ensures that topics include emerging research, and suggests topics of special importance to their country/region. Topics covered may include ambulatory anesthesia; anesthesia and inflammation; anesthetic mechanisms; anesthetic pharmacology; cardiovascular anesthesia; critical care anesthesia; local anesthetic pharmacology; monitoring technology; neuroanesthesia; neuromuscular blockade; obstetrical anesthesia; pain mechanisms; pain therapy; patient safety; pediatric anesthesia; quality assessment; regional anesthesia; and transplantation anesthesia.