Analysis across case-based global sustainability projects: an emerging challenge for ocean conflict research in the Anthropocene

IF 2.2 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Maritime Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1007/s40152-023-00323-3

Marion Glaser, Samiya Ahmed Selim, Raquel De la Cruz-Modino, Ingrid van Putten, Shankar Aswani Canela, Adina Paytan, Leo X.C. Dutra, Nadine Heck, Siddharth Narayan, Warwick Sauer, Wiebren Johannes Boonstra, Bernadette Snow

{"title":"Analysis across case-based global sustainability projects: an emerging challenge for ocean conflict research in the Anthropocene","authors":"Marion Glaser, Samiya Ahmed Selim, Raquel De la Cruz-Modino, Ingrid van Putten, Shankar Aswani Canela, Adina Paytan, Leo X.C. Dutra, Nadine Heck, Siddharth Narayan, Warwick Sauer, Wiebren Johannes Boonstra, Bernadette Snow","doi":"10.1007/s40152-023-00323-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A growing number of global ocean conflict studies over the last decade have set out to advance sustainability in the Anthropocene. Many of these research projects use multiple case studies to extract lessons for wider contexts. The methods used by these studies, and the extent to which their results have validity beyond the individual case study, often remain unclear. This paper explores the challenges in performing cross-case analysis within what we denote as case-based globally focussed sustainability projects (CB-GSPs) and indicates solutions by combining information from semi-structured interviews with leading scientists from eight CB-GSPs. We identify six distinct challenges that are common across these studies with regard to generating actionable knowledge through cross-case analysis. Based on these findings, we propose a set of best practice recommendations for scientists, project partners, and funders to co-produce actionable knowledge for global projects on ocean conflict.","PeriodicalId":45628,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Studies","volume":"74 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maritime Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-023-00323-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract A growing number of global ocean conflict studies over the last decade have set out to advance sustainability in the Anthropocene. Many of these research projects use multiple case studies to extract lessons for wider contexts. The methods used by these studies, and the extent to which their results have validity beyond the individual case study, often remain unclear. This paper explores the challenges in performing cross-case analysis within what we denote as case-based globally focussed sustainability projects (CB-GSPs) and indicates solutions by combining information from semi-structured interviews with leading scientists from eight CB-GSPs. We identify six distinct challenges that are common across these studies with regard to generating actionable knowledge through cross-case analysis. Based on these findings, we propose a set of best practice recommendations for scientists, project partners, and funders to co-produce actionable knowledge for global projects on ocean conflict.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于案例的全球可持续发展项目分析:人类世海洋冲突研究的新挑战

在过去十年中，越来越多的全球海洋冲突研究开始着手推进人类世的可持续性。许多这些研究项目使用多个案例研究来提取更广泛背景下的经验教训。这些研究使用的方法，以及它们的结果在多大程度上具有超出个别案例研究的有效性，往往仍然不清楚。本文探讨了在我们所称的基于案例的全球重点可持续发展项目(CB-GSPs)中进行跨案例分析的挑战，并通过结合对来自八个CB-GSPs的领先科学家的半结构化访谈的信息，提出了解决方案。在通过跨案例分析产生可操作的知识方面，我们确定了这些研究中常见的六个不同挑战。基于这些发现，我们为科学家、项目合作伙伴和资助者提出了一套最佳实践建议，以共同为全球海洋冲突项目提供可操作的知识。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Maritime Studies ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

11.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Maritime Studies is an international peer-reviewed journal on the social dimensions of coastal and marine issues throughout the world. The journal is a venue for theoretical and empirical research relevant to a wide range of academic social science disciplines, including anthropology, sociology, geography, history and political science. Space is especially given to develop academic concepts and debate. We invite original research papers, reviews and viewpoints and welcome proposals for special issues that make a distinctive contribution to contemporary discussion around maritime and coastal use, development and governance. The journal provides a rigorous but constructive review process and rapid publication, and is accessible to new researchers, including postgraduate students and early career academics.