Rights-based approaches and Indigenous peoples and local communities: Findings from a literature review

Q1 Veterinary
Juan Pablo Sarmiento Barletti, Léna Prouchet, Anne M. Larson
{"title":"Rights-based approaches and Indigenous peoples and local communities: Findings from a literature review","authors":"Juan Pablo Sarmiento Barletti, Léna Prouchet, Anne M. Larson","doi":"10.1079/cabireviews.2023.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This preliminary assessment of rights-based approaches (RBAs) seeks to contribute to the ongoing discussions of RBAs for Indigenous Peoples and local communities (IPs and LCs). RBAs purposefully position the recognition of, respect for, and access to individual and collective rights as central to an initiative’s planning, design, implementation, process monitoring, and outcomes. In mainstream climate change, conservation, and development programs and policies, this means refocusing the relationship between “beneficiaries” and “implementers” to one of rights-holders and duty-bearers. RBAs hold growing discursive importance in relation to the rights of IPs and LCs in conservation and climate change spheres, including the agendas of international agencies. The growing interest in RBAs, and their inclusion in frameworks that will guide development, conservation, and climate projects over the next decade, is laudable. However, there are few reviews that seek to understand how RBAs emerged and how they have been conceptualized. Such analysis is a necessary basis from which to advance discussions on the impact of RBAs and provide lessons to support them. In this review, our primary interest is the conception, conceptualization, and implementation of RBAs in forest-based initiatives, but we reviewed the wider scholarly and gray literature on RBAs in development, conservation, and climate action initiatives.","PeriodicalId":39273,"journal":{"name":"CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabireviews.2023.0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This preliminary assessment of rights-based approaches (RBAs) seeks to contribute to the ongoing discussions of RBAs for Indigenous Peoples and local communities (IPs and LCs). RBAs purposefully position the recognition of, respect for, and access to individual and collective rights as central to an initiative’s planning, design, implementation, process monitoring, and outcomes. In mainstream climate change, conservation, and development programs and policies, this means refocusing the relationship between “beneficiaries” and “implementers” to one of rights-holders and duty-bearers. RBAs hold growing discursive importance in relation to the rights of IPs and LCs in conservation and climate change spheres, including the agendas of international agencies. The growing interest in RBAs, and their inclusion in frameworks that will guide development, conservation, and climate projects over the next decade, is laudable. However, there are few reviews that seek to understand how RBAs emerged and how they have been conceptualized. Such analysis is a necessary basis from which to advance discussions on the impact of RBAs and provide lessons to support them. In this review, our primary interest is the conception, conceptualization, and implementation of RBAs in forest-based initiatives, but we reviewed the wider scholarly and gray literature on RBAs in development, conservation, and climate action initiatives.
基于权利的方法与土著人民和地方社区:文献综述的结果
本文对基于权利的方法(RBAs)进行了初步评估,旨在为土著人民和地方社区(ip和LCs)基于权利的方法的持续讨论做出贡献。rba有目的地将对个人和集体权利的承认、尊重和访问定位为活动计划、设计、实现、过程监控和结果的中心。在主流的气候变化、保护和发展规划和政策中,这意味着将“受益者”和“实施者”之间的关系重新聚焦于权利持有人和责任承担者之间的关系。在保护和气候变化领域,包括国际机构的议程中,区域利益协定对知识产权国家和最不发达国家的权利具有越来越重要的话语意义。人们对rba越来越感兴趣,并将其纳入指导未来十年发展、保护和气候项目的框架,这是值得称赞的。然而,很少有评论试图理解rba是如何出现的以及它们是如何被概念化的。这种分析是推动关于rba影响的讨论并提供支持它们的经验教训的必要基础。在这篇综述中,我们主要关注的是基于森林的倡议中RBAs的概念、概念化和实施,但我们回顾了关于RBAs在发展、保护和气候行动倡议中的更广泛的学术和灰色文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources
CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信