The Effect of State Housing Policies on Eviction Filings and Judgments in the United States, 2001–2018

IF 2.8 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Ashley C. Bradford, W. David Bradford
{"title":"The Effect of State Housing Policies on Eviction Filings and Judgments in the United States, 2001–2018","authors":"Ashley C. Bradford, W. David Bradford","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2023.2271881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractHousing instability is a significant problem in the United States, with a long literature documenting its impact on the social well-being of Americans. A relatively new line of research has illuminated the degree to which eviction is a substantial contributor to health risks, including “deaths of despair” from alcohol or drug-related accidental poisonings. Although eviction is a persistent threat in the United States, there is comparatively less research that is both longitudinal and that evaluates multiple policies simultaneously to guide decision makers about which policies are more or less effective at lowering eviction activity. In this study we test the association between housing policies and eviction processes for a large proportion of U.S. counties from 2001 to 2018 using a panel of state-level landlord–tenant laws and a panel of local housing-specific investments by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. We find evidence that some state and local policies are effective at reducing the number of eviction filings and the incidence of multiple filings to the same household, although there is less evidence that actual eviction judgments can be mitigated with these policies.Keywords: Evictionlandlord–tenant policyJEL CLASSIFICATION CODES: O18K25R38 Data AvailabilityThe authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.Disclosure StatementNeither author has any conflicts of interest, real or apparent, to report.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAshley C. BradfordAshley C. Bradford is an assistant professor in the School of Public Policy at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her research explores how various policies affect risky behaviors and substance use in the United States and how state and local landlord–tenant policies affect housing instability.W. David BradfordW. David Bradford is the George D. Busbee Chair in Public Policy in the Department of Public Administration and Policy at the University of Georgia. A significant component of his current research involves studying substance use policy (including cannabis and opioid policies); housing policies, especially as they relate to health outcomes; and the economics of the pharmaceutical industry. He is a Co-Editor for the journal Health Economics. He is currently serving on the Executive Board of the American Society of Health Economists.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":"280 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Policy Debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2023.2271881","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractHousing instability is a significant problem in the United States, with a long literature documenting its impact on the social well-being of Americans. A relatively new line of research has illuminated the degree to which eviction is a substantial contributor to health risks, including “deaths of despair” from alcohol or drug-related accidental poisonings. Although eviction is a persistent threat in the United States, there is comparatively less research that is both longitudinal and that evaluates multiple policies simultaneously to guide decision makers about which policies are more or less effective at lowering eviction activity. In this study we test the association between housing policies and eviction processes for a large proportion of U.S. counties from 2001 to 2018 using a panel of state-level landlord–tenant laws and a panel of local housing-specific investments by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. We find evidence that some state and local policies are effective at reducing the number of eviction filings and the incidence of multiple filings to the same household, although there is less evidence that actual eviction judgments can be mitigated with these policies.Keywords: Evictionlandlord–tenant policyJEL CLASSIFICATION CODES: O18K25R38 Data AvailabilityThe authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.Disclosure StatementNeither author has any conflicts of interest, real or apparent, to report.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAshley C. BradfordAshley C. Bradford is an assistant professor in the School of Public Policy at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her research explores how various policies affect risky behaviors and substance use in the United States and how state and local landlord–tenant policies affect housing instability.W. David BradfordW. David Bradford is the George D. Busbee Chair in Public Policy in the Department of Public Administration and Policy at the University of Georgia. A significant component of his current research involves studying substance use policy (including cannabis and opioid policies); housing policies, especially as they relate to health outcomes; and the economics of the pharmaceutical industry. He is a Co-Editor for the journal Health Economics. He is currently serving on the Executive Board of the American Society of Health Economists.
2001-2018年美国州住房政策对驱逐申请和判决的影响
住房不稳定是美国的一个重要问题,大量文献记录了它对美国人社会福祉的影响。一项相对较新的研究表明,驱逐在很大程度上是健康风险的一个重要因素,包括因酒精或与毒品有关的意外中毒而"绝望死亡"。尽管驱逐在美国是一个持续存在的威胁,但相对较少的研究是纵向的,同时评估多种政策,以指导决策者哪些政策在降低驱逐活动方面或多或少有效。在这项研究中,我们测试了2001年至2018年期间美国大部分县的住房政策与驱逐程序之间的关系,使用的是州级房东-租户法律小组和美国住房和城市发展部的地方住房特定投资小组。我们发现有证据表明,一些州和地方政策在减少驱逐申请数量和同一家庭多次申请的发生率方面是有效的,尽管很少有证据表明这些政策可以减轻实际的驱逐判决。关键词:驱逐房东-租客政策jel分类代码:O18K25R38数据可得性作者确认在文章及其补充资料中可获得支持本研究结果的数据。披露声明作者没有任何利益冲突,真实的或明显的,报告。作者简介:ashley C. Bradford,乔治亚理工学院公共政策学院助理教授。她的研究探讨了各种政策如何影响美国的危险行为和物质使用,以及州和地方的房东-租户政策如何影响住房的不稳定性。大卫BradfordW。大卫·布拉德福德是乔治亚大学公共管理与政策系公共政策乔治·d·巴斯比教授。他目前研究的一个重要组成部分涉及研究物质使用政策(包括大麻和阿片类药物政策);住房政策,特别是与健康结果有关的住房政策;以及制药行业的经济学。他是《卫生经济学》杂志的联合编辑。他目前是美国卫生经济学家协会的执行委员会成员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
17.20%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Housing Policy Debate provides a venue for original research on U.S. housing policy. Subjects include affordable housing policy, fair housing policy, land use regulations influencing housing affordability, metropolitan development trends, and linkages among housing policy and energy, environmental, and transportation policy. Housing Policy Debate is published quarterly. Most issues feature a Forum section and an Articles section. The Forum, which highlights a current debate, features a central article and responding comments that represent a range of perspectives. All articles in the Forum and Articles sections undergo a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信