Casimir Effect Invalidates the Drude Model for Transverse Electric Evanescent Waves

IF 1.5 Q2 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Physics Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.3390/physics5040062
Galina L. Klimchitskaya, Vladimir M. Mostepanenko
{"title":"Casimir Effect Invalidates the Drude Model for Transverse Electric Evanescent Waves","authors":"Galina L. Klimchitskaya, Vladimir M. Mostepanenko","doi":"10.3390/physics5040062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the Casimir pressure between two metallic plates and calculate the four contributions to it determined by the propagating and evanescent waves and by the transverse magnetic and transverse electric polarizations of the electromagnetic field. The range of interplate separations is considered where nearly the whole pressure has its origin in the electromagnetic response of conduction electrons. In the Casimir physics, this response is described either by the dissipative Drude model resulting in contradictions with the measurement data or by the experimentally consistent but dissipationless plasma model. It is shown that the total transverse magnetic contribution to the Casimir pressure due to both the propagating and evanescent waves and the transverse electric contribution due to only the propagating waves, computed by means of the Drude model, correlate well with the corresponding results obtained using the plasma model. The conclusion is made that a disagreement between the theoretical predictions obtained using the Drude model and precision measurements of the Casimir force is not caused by the account of dissipation in itself, but arises from an incorrect description of the response of metals to the low-frequency transverse electric evanescent waves by this model. It is demonstrated that the Drude model has no supporting experimental evidence in the range of transverse electric evanescent waves, so that the above conclusion is consistent with all available information. The alternative test of the Drude model for the transverse electric evanescent waves suggested in the framework of classical electrodynamics is discussed.","PeriodicalId":20136,"journal":{"name":"Physics","volume":"109 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/physics5040062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We consider the Casimir pressure between two metallic plates and calculate the four contributions to it determined by the propagating and evanescent waves and by the transverse magnetic and transverse electric polarizations of the electromagnetic field. The range of interplate separations is considered where nearly the whole pressure has its origin in the electromagnetic response of conduction electrons. In the Casimir physics, this response is described either by the dissipative Drude model resulting in contradictions with the measurement data or by the experimentally consistent but dissipationless plasma model. It is shown that the total transverse magnetic contribution to the Casimir pressure due to both the propagating and evanescent waves and the transverse electric contribution due to only the propagating waves, computed by means of the Drude model, correlate well with the corresponding results obtained using the plasma model. The conclusion is made that a disagreement between the theoretical predictions obtained using the Drude model and precision measurements of the Casimir force is not caused by the account of dissipation in itself, but arises from an incorrect description of the response of metals to the low-frequency transverse electric evanescent waves by this model. It is demonstrated that the Drude model has no supporting experimental evidence in the range of transverse electric evanescent waves, so that the above conclusion is consistent with all available information. The alternative test of the Drude model for the transverse electric evanescent waves suggested in the framework of classical electrodynamics is discussed.
卡西米尔效应使德鲁德模型失效
我们考虑两个金属板之间的卡西米尔压力,并计算了由电磁场的传播波和倏逝波以及横向磁极化和横向电极化决定的四个对它的贡献。考虑了板间分离的范围,其中几乎所有的压力都来源于传导电子的电磁响应。在卡西米尔物理中,这种响应要么用耗散的德鲁德模型来描述,结果与测量数据相矛盾,要么用实验一致但无耗散的等离子体模型来描述。结果表明,用德鲁德模型计算的传播波和倏逝波对卡西米尔压力的总横向磁贡献和仅传播波对卡西米尔压力的横向电贡献与用等离子体模型得到的相应结果具有良好的相关性。得出的结论是,使用德鲁德模型得到的理论预测与卡西米尔力的精确测量之间的不一致不是由于耗散本身造成的,而是由于该模型对金属对低频横向电倏逝波的响应描述不正确。结果表明,在横向电倏逝波范围内,德鲁德模型没有实验证据支持,因此上述结论与现有的所有信息是一致的。讨论了在经典电动力学框架下提出的关于横向电隐去波的德鲁德模型的替代检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics
Physics PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信