Why They Intend to Leave: The Role of Burnout Between the Faculty Work Environment and Intent to Leave Academia

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
{"title":"Why They Intend to Leave: The Role of Burnout Between the Faculty Work Environment and Intent to Leave Academia","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jepr.05.03.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though faculty are crucial to university success, faculty work motivation research often lacks a theoretical basis and discounts potential affective influences like burnout. Such limitations reduce the ability to understand faculty work motivation and, thus, to facilitate its development. To overcome these, the Affective Events Theory was applied to the domain of faculty work motivation. The resultant model was tested using faculty participants from 24 doctoral universities. Participants completed a survey assessing work-related characteristics, affect (burnout), and cognitions. Results revealed that faculty at doctoral universities (i.e., High and Very High Research Activity Universities) experienced less burnout when they received support from their institution, had autonomy in structuring their daily tasks, viewed their job as important, completed their tasks from beginning to end, experienced less skill and task variety, and were in good health. Those who experienced burnout reported diminished job satisfaction, reduced commitment, and less intention to stay in academia. The implications for theoretical research, institutional policy, and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":42280,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychological and Educational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychological and Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jepr.05.03.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Though faculty are crucial to university success, faculty work motivation research often lacks a theoretical basis and discounts potential affective influences like burnout. Such limitations reduce the ability to understand faculty work motivation and, thus, to facilitate its development. To overcome these, the Affective Events Theory was applied to the domain of faculty work motivation. The resultant model was tested using faculty participants from 24 doctoral universities. Participants completed a survey assessing work-related characteristics, affect (burnout), and cognitions. Results revealed that faculty at doctoral universities (i.e., High and Very High Research Activity Universities) experienced less burnout when they received support from their institution, had autonomy in structuring their daily tasks, viewed their job as important, completed their tasks from beginning to end, experienced less skill and task variety, and were in good health. Those who experienced burnout reported diminished job satisfaction, reduced commitment, and less intention to stay in academia. The implications for theoretical research, institutional policy, and practice are discussed.
他们为什么要离开:职业倦怠在教师工作环境和离开学术界意图之间的作用
虽然教师对大学的成功至关重要,但教师工作动机研究往往缺乏理论基础,并且忽视了倦怠等潜在的情感影响。这些限制降低了理解教师工作动机的能力,从而促进了教师工作动机的发展。为了克服这些问题,我们将情感事件理论应用于教师工作动机领域。结果模型使用来自24所博士院校的教师参与者进行了测试。参与者完成了一项评估工作相关特征、影响(倦怠)和认知的调查。结果显示,博士大学(即高研究活动大学和极高研究活动大学)的教师在得到机构支持、在安排日常任务方面有自主权、认为自己的工作很重要、从头到尾完成任务、技能和任务多样性较少、身体健康时,他们的职业倦怠程度较低。那些经历过职业倦怠的人报告说,他们的工作满意度降低了,承诺减少了,留在学术界的意愿也降低了。讨论了对理论研究、制度政策和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Psychological and Educational Research is a scientific review, appearing biannually, which publishes scientific materials belonging to all the fields of psychology. The emphasis falls on empirical studies, but it may include reviews, theoretical or methodological papers in psychology. Empirical papers with a strong theoretical framework and/or models of computational parameters are particularly encouraged. Theoretical papers of scholarly substance on abnormality may be appropriate if they advance understanding of a specific issue directly relevant to psychology and fall within the length restrictions of a regular (not extended) article. As a journal that focuses on researches within a quantitative, scientific remit, Journal of Psychological and Educational Research places particular emphasis on the publishing of high-quality empirical reports based on experimental and behavioural studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信