[Endodontic treatment and extractions--extent and reasons].

T Augstson
{"title":"[Endodontic treatment and extractions--extent and reasons].","authors":"T Augstson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To give input to the ongoing discussion on length of intervals between recalls for reexamination, a comparison of number of extracted teeth etc per 1000 patients per year has been done in Hordaland. Treatment carried out on 22,324 patients aged 0-18 years during a period of 6 months was registered. In 1989 only 1.5 permanent teeth per 1000 patients were extracted because of caries-damage. This is about 2 per cent of the number of the extractions in a similar group in 1967. The number of permanent teeth that needed rootfilling was twice as large 15 years ago. The number of deciduous teeth extracted per 1000 patients is reduced to one fifth in 15 years. Only 10 per cent of extracted permanent teeth were lost because of caries. Out of 44 rootfillings less than one half was performed because of caries. The author doubts that increased intervals between recalls for reexamination will lead to more extractions and/or rootfillings.</p>","PeriodicalId":75780,"journal":{"name":"Den Norske tannlaegeforenings tidende","volume":"100 6","pages":"244-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Den Norske tannlaegeforenings tidende","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To give input to the ongoing discussion on length of intervals between recalls for reexamination, a comparison of number of extracted teeth etc per 1000 patients per year has been done in Hordaland. Treatment carried out on 22,324 patients aged 0-18 years during a period of 6 months was registered. In 1989 only 1.5 permanent teeth per 1000 patients were extracted because of caries-damage. This is about 2 per cent of the number of the extractions in a similar group in 1967. The number of permanent teeth that needed rootfilling was twice as large 15 years ago. The number of deciduous teeth extracted per 1000 patients is reduced to one fifth in 15 years. Only 10 per cent of extracted permanent teeth were lost because of caries. Out of 44 rootfillings less than one half was performed because of caries. The author doubts that increased intervals between recalls for reexamination will lead to more extractions and/or rootfillings.

【根管治疗和拔牙——范围和原因】。
为了给正在进行的关于重新检查的召回间隔长度的讨论提供输入,在荷兰进行了每年每1000名患者拔牙数量等的比较。在6个月的时间里,对22,324名0-18岁的患者进行了治疗。1989年,每1000名患者中只有1.5颗恒牙因龋齿受损而被拔除。这大约是1967年同类群体中采掘数量的2%。需要补根的恒牙数量是15年前的两倍。每1000名患者拔除乳牙的数量在15年内减少到五分之一。拔出来的恒牙只有10%因为龋齿而脱落。在44例牙根充填中,因龋齿不足一半。作者怀疑,增加召回之间的间隔,重新检查将导致更多的提取和/或根填充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信