Crisis Detection in the Age of Digital Communication: The Power of Social Listening as a Method to Identify Corporate Events in Time Series Data

Q1 Social Sciences
Reimund Homann, Jörg Forthmann, Luisa Esser
{"title":"Crisis Detection in the Age of Digital Communication: The Power of Social Listening as a Method to Identify Corporate Events in Time Series Data","authors":"Reimund Homann, Jörg Forthmann, Luisa Esser","doi":"10.31907/2617-121x.2022.05.01.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increased usage of digital media to exchange information has increased the speed in which corporate crises become known. This has increased the necessity to react to a crisis as quickly as possible. As a result, social listening – i.e. listening to and analysing digital communication – is establishing itself as an instrument for companies to control their own representation in the media. Against this background, different methodological approaches in crisis detection (e.g. outlier detection, t-test and Chow test) were tested regarding their quality. For that, we used a data set created by an AI crawling online sources and analysing the results using a neural network. The findings of this study suggest that crises can be identified quite reliably using existing econometric methods. A simple outlier detection in a time series of the total number of fragments that uses a time frame of one month on each side of a crisis seems to be the best method so far with the method by Chen and Liu being a close second. The results of this study provide a foundational contribution to this field of research and can help companies detect crises as early as possible allowing the management to react appropriately.","PeriodicalId":34327,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31907/2617-121x.2022.05.01.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increased usage of digital media to exchange information has increased the speed in which corporate crises become known. This has increased the necessity to react to a crisis as quickly as possible. As a result, social listening – i.e. listening to and analysing digital communication – is establishing itself as an instrument for companies to control their own representation in the media. Against this background, different methodological approaches in crisis detection (e.g. outlier detection, t-test and Chow test) were tested regarding their quality. For that, we used a data set created by an AI crawling online sources and analysing the results using a neural network. The findings of this study suggest that crises can be identified quite reliably using existing econometric methods. A simple outlier detection in a time series of the total number of fragments that uses a time frame of one month on each side of a crisis seems to be the best method so far with the method by Chen and Liu being a close second. The results of this study provide a foundational contribution to this field of research and can help companies detect crises as early as possible allowing the management to react appropriately.
数字传播时代的危机检测:社会倾听作为一种识别时间序列数据中企业事件的方法的力量
越来越多地使用数字媒体来交换信息,加快了企业危机曝光的速度。这增加了尽快对危机作出反应的必要性。因此,社会倾听——即倾听和分析数字通信——正在成为公司控制自己在媒体中的表现的工具。在此背景下,对危机检测的不同方法(如异常值检测、t检验和Chow检验)的质量进行了测试。为此,我们使用了由人工智能抓取在线资源创建的数据集,并使用神经网络分析结果。本研究的结果表明,使用现有的计量经济学方法可以相当可靠地识别危机。在危机的每一方使用一个月的时间框架,在片段总数的时间序列中进行简单的异常值检测,似乎是迄今为止最好的方法,Chen和Liu的方法紧随其后。本研究的结果为这一研究领域提供了基础贡献,可以帮助公司尽早发现危机,使管理层能够做出适当的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信