Must social performance ratings be idiosyncratic? An exploration of social performance ratings with predictive validity

IF 5.2 4区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Jan Svanberg, Tohid Ardeshiri, Isak Samsten, Peter Öhman, Presha E. Neidermeyer, Tarek Rana, Frank Maisano, Mats Danielson
{"title":"Must social performance ratings be idiosyncratic? An exploration of social performance ratings with predictive validity","authors":"Jan Svanberg, Tohid Ardeshiri, Isak Samsten, Peter Öhman, Presha E. Neidermeyer, Tarek Rana, Frank Maisano, Mats Danielson","doi":"10.1108/sampj-03-2022-0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this study is to develop a method to assess social performance. Traditionally, environment, social and governance (ESG) rating providers use subjectively weighted arithmetic averages to combine a set of social performance (SP) indicators into one single rating. To overcome this problem, this study investigates the preconditions for a new methodology for rating the SP component of the ESG by applying machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) anchored to social controversies. Design/methodology/approach This study proposes the use of a data-driven rating methodology that derives the relative importance of SP features from their contribution to the prediction of social controversies. The authors use the proposed methodology to solve the weighting problem with overall ESG ratings and further investigate whether prediction is possible. Findings The authors find that ML models are able to predict controversies with high predictive performance and validity. The findings indicate that the weighting problem with the ESG ratings can be addressed with a data-driven approach. The decisive prerequisite, however, for the proposed rating methodology is that social controversies are predicted by a broad set of SP indicators. The results also suggest that predictively valid ratings can be developed with this ML-based AI method. Practical implications This study offers practical solutions to ESG rating problems that have implications for investors, ESG raters and socially responsible investments. Social implications The proposed ML-based AI method can help to achieve better ESG ratings, which will in turn help to improve SP, which has implications for organizations and societies through sustainable development. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this research is one of the first studies that offers a unique method to address the ESG rating problem and improve sustainability by focusing on SP indicators.","PeriodicalId":22143,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-03-2022-0127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to develop a method to assess social performance. Traditionally, environment, social and governance (ESG) rating providers use subjectively weighted arithmetic averages to combine a set of social performance (SP) indicators into one single rating. To overcome this problem, this study investigates the preconditions for a new methodology for rating the SP component of the ESG by applying machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) anchored to social controversies. Design/methodology/approach This study proposes the use of a data-driven rating methodology that derives the relative importance of SP features from their contribution to the prediction of social controversies. The authors use the proposed methodology to solve the weighting problem with overall ESG ratings and further investigate whether prediction is possible. Findings The authors find that ML models are able to predict controversies with high predictive performance and validity. The findings indicate that the weighting problem with the ESG ratings can be addressed with a data-driven approach. The decisive prerequisite, however, for the proposed rating methodology is that social controversies are predicted by a broad set of SP indicators. The results also suggest that predictively valid ratings can be developed with this ML-based AI method. Practical implications This study offers practical solutions to ESG rating problems that have implications for investors, ESG raters and socially responsible investments. Social implications The proposed ML-based AI method can help to achieve better ESG ratings, which will in turn help to improve SP, which has implications for organizations and societies through sustainable development. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this research is one of the first studies that offers a unique method to address the ESG rating problem and improve sustainability by focusing on SP indicators.
社会表现评级必须是特殊的吗?具有预测效度的社会表现评等之探讨
本研究的目的是发展一种评估社会绩效的方法。传统上,环境、社会和治理(ESG)评级提供商使用主观加权算术平均值将一组社会绩效(SP)指标合并为一个评级。为了克服这一问题,本研究通过应用机器学习(ML)和人工智能(AI)来研究ESG SP部分评级新方法的先决条件,这些方法与社会争议有关。设计/方法/方法本研究建议使用数据驱动的评级方法,从SP特征对预测社会争议的贡献中得出其相对重要性。作者使用提出的方法来解决整体ESG评级的权重问题,并进一步研究预测是否可能。作者发现机器学习模型能够预测争议,具有较高的预测性能和有效性。研究结果表明,ESG评级的权重问题可以通过数据驱动的方法来解决。然而,拟议的评级方法的决定性先决条件是,社会争议是通过一系列广泛的标准普尔指标来预测的。结果还表明,可以使用这种基于ml的AI方法开发具有预测有效性的评级。本研究为ESG评级问题提供了实用的解决方案,对投资者、ESG评级机构和社会责任投资都有意义。提出的基于ml的人工智能方法可以帮助实现更好的ESG评级,从而有助于提高SP,从而通过可持续发展对组织和社会产生影响。据作者所知,这项研究是第一批提供独特方法来解决ESG评级问题并通过关注SP指标来提高可持续性的研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信