Quick-and-Wide Propagation of Disaster Tweets: Why It Matters and How to Measure It

Jaebong Son
{"title":"Quick-and-Wide Propagation of Disaster Tweets: Why It Matters and How to Measure It","authors":"Jaebong Son","doi":"10.1145/3631341.3631344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As dynamic, non-routine disaster events appear and disappear in a short period, quickly and widely disseminating emergency warnings and alerts to the public is a critical communication goal for emergency management officers and citizen journalists. Twitter has become a prominent communication medium to achieve such a communication goal, attracting academic scholars, government agencies, and industry practitioners. However, most academic research and government reports have relied on either the retweet count or retweet time to understand factors affecting the propagation of disaster information. We argue that neither measure is sufficient to reflect the extent to which disaster tweets are quickly and widely propagated. Hence, we propose a new measure called the Propagation Index (PI) to better evaluate quick and wide propagation of disaster information. Using two Twitter datasets, we empirically examine the proposed measure in association with the Twitter features and compare its statistical results with those of the retweet count and retweet time. Our findings suggest that the PI more accurately captures how quickly and widely disaster tweets are propagated than the other measures. Therefore, this study contributes to academia, governments, and industry to improve their understanding of the propagation of disaster information on Twitter.","PeriodicalId":152518,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigmis Database","volume":"52 11-12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigmis Database","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3631341.3631344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As dynamic, non-routine disaster events appear and disappear in a short period, quickly and widely disseminating emergency warnings and alerts to the public is a critical communication goal for emergency management officers and citizen journalists. Twitter has become a prominent communication medium to achieve such a communication goal, attracting academic scholars, government agencies, and industry practitioners. However, most academic research and government reports have relied on either the retweet count or retweet time to understand factors affecting the propagation of disaster information. We argue that neither measure is sufficient to reflect the extent to which disaster tweets are quickly and widely propagated. Hence, we propose a new measure called the Propagation Index (PI) to better evaluate quick and wide propagation of disaster information. Using two Twitter datasets, we empirically examine the proposed measure in association with the Twitter features and compare its statistical results with those of the retweet count and retweet time. Our findings suggest that the PI more accurately captures how quickly and widely disaster tweets are propagated than the other measures. Therefore, this study contributes to academia, governments, and industry to improve their understanding of the propagation of disaster information on Twitter.
灾难推文的快速和广泛传播:为什么它很重要以及如何衡量它
由于灾害事件在短时间内出现和消失是动态的、非常规的,快速、广泛地向公众传播应急预警和警报是应急管理人员和公民记者的重要传播目标。Twitter已经成为实现这一传播目标的突出传播媒介,吸引了学术学者、政府机构和行业从业者。然而,大多数学术研究和政府报告都依赖于转发次数或转发时间来了解影响灾难信息传播的因素。我们认为,这两种措施都不足以反映灾难推文迅速和广泛传播的程度。因此,我们提出了一种新的度量方法,称为传播指数(PI),以更好地评估灾害信息的快速和广泛传播。使用两个Twitter数据集,我们实证检验了所提出的度量与Twitter特征的关联,并将其统计结果与转发计数和转发时间的统计结果进行了比较。我们的研究结果表明,PI比其他指标更准确地捕捉到灾难推文传播的速度和范围。因此,本研究有助于学术界、政府和业界提高对Twitter上灾难信息传播的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信