A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OLOPATADINE 0.01% COMBINED FLUOROMETHOLONE 0.1% TREATMENT VERSUS OLOPATADINE 0.01% COMBINED KETOROLAC 0.4% TREATMENT IN ALLERGIC CONJUNCTIVITIS IN SAROJINI DEVI EYE HOSPITAL

N. KARUNA SREE, KHATIJATUL KUBRA NAMEERA, THOMAS SANGA, FAHEEM BEGUM, V. NAVYA, NABEELA FATIMA
{"title":"A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OLOPATADINE 0.01% COMBINED FLUOROMETHOLONE 0.1% TREATMENT VERSUS OLOPATADINE 0.01% COMBINED KETOROLAC 0.4% TREATMENT IN ALLERGIC CONJUNCTIVITIS IN SAROJINI DEVI EYE HOSPITAL","authors":"N. KARUNA SREE, KHATIJATUL KUBRA NAMEERA, THOMAS SANGA, FAHEEM BEGUM, V. NAVYA, NABEELA FATIMA","doi":"10.22159/ijpps.2023v15i10.47483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Comparative study of the efficacy of olopatadine 0.01% combined fluorometholone 0.1% treatment versus olopatadine 0.01% combined ketorolac 0.4% in the treatment of Allergic Conjuctivitis. Methods: This was a randomized control trial done on 80 subjects with 40 subjects in each group. The clinical signs (chemosis, mucus secretion, eyelid edema) and symptoms (itching, redness, watery eyes, burning) of the patients were evaluated by summing up the scores using a 3-point scale at baseline,1st and 7th day of initiation of treatment. Results were analyzed by Student’s Independent t-test to assess the significant difference of means between the groups. p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The mean age of the study subjects was 29.8±13.5 in Group A and 32.6±8.8 in Group B. Majority were females in both group A and group B with 52.5% and 62.5% respectively. The reduction was high for chemosis (87.7%) followed by mucous secretion (87.5%) in group A. Highest reduction was seen with itching (59.9%) followed by burning (52.5%) in group B. Significant difference between the groups was noticed with itching (p=0.04), mucous secretion(p=<0.001), chemosis (p=0.01) and eyelid oedema (p=0.009). No significant difference was observed between the two groups (p=0.15) regarding adverse events. Conclusion: Olopatadine 0.01% combined fluorometholone 0.1% had better efficacy than olopatadine 0.01% combined ketorolac 0.4%.","PeriodicalId":14188,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijpps.2023v15i10.47483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Comparative study of the efficacy of olopatadine 0.01% combined fluorometholone 0.1% treatment versus olopatadine 0.01% combined ketorolac 0.4% in the treatment of Allergic Conjuctivitis. Methods: This was a randomized control trial done on 80 subjects with 40 subjects in each group. The clinical signs (chemosis, mucus secretion, eyelid edema) and symptoms (itching, redness, watery eyes, burning) of the patients were evaluated by summing up the scores using a 3-point scale at baseline,1st and 7th day of initiation of treatment. Results were analyzed by Student’s Independent t-test to assess the significant difference of means between the groups. p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The mean age of the study subjects was 29.8±13.5 in Group A and 32.6±8.8 in Group B. Majority were females in both group A and group B with 52.5% and 62.5% respectively. The reduction was high for chemosis (87.7%) followed by mucous secretion (87.5%) in group A. Highest reduction was seen with itching (59.9%) followed by burning (52.5%) in group B. Significant difference between the groups was noticed with itching (p=0.04), mucous secretion(p=<0.001), chemosis (p=0.01) and eyelid oedema (p=0.009). No significant difference was observed between the two groups (p=0.15) regarding adverse events. Conclusion: Olopatadine 0.01% combined fluorometholone 0.1% had better efficacy than olopatadine 0.01% combined ketorolac 0.4%.
0.01%奥洛他定联合氟美洛酮0.1%治疗与0.01%奥洛他定联合酮咯酸0.4%治疗萨罗吉尼眼科医院变应性结膜炎的比较研究
目的:比较0.01%奥洛他定联合氟美洛酮0.1%治疗与0.01%奥洛他定联合酮咯酸0.4%治疗变应性结膜炎的疗效。方法:采用随机对照试验,80例,每组40例。在基线、治疗开始第1天和第7天,采用3分制对患者的临床体征(化脓、粘液分泌、眼睑水肿)和症状(瘙痒、发红、流泪、灼烧)进行评分。结果采用学生独立t检验进行分析,以评估组间均值的显著性差异。p值小于0.05为显著性。结果:A组平均年龄为29.8±13.5岁,B组平均年龄为32.6±8.8岁,A组和B组均以女性为主,分别占52.5%和62.5%。a组减少幅度最大的是化脓(87.7%),其次是粘液分泌(87.5%)。b组减少幅度最大的是瘙痒(59.9%),其次是灼烧(52.5%)。组间差异有统计学意义的是瘙痒(p=0.04)、粘液分泌(p=<0.001)、化脓(p=0.01)和眼睑水肿(p=0.009)。在不良事件方面,两组间无显著差异(p=0.15)。结论:0.01%奥洛他定联合氟美洛酮0.1%疗效优于0.01%奥洛他定联合酮咯酸0.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信