Seven Aspects of Healthcare Customer Satisfaction And Factors Affecting It Within Emergency Department

IF 0.6 Q4 Health Professions
Muhammad Irfan Irfan, Mirza Kashif Baig
{"title":"Seven Aspects of Healthcare Customer Satisfaction And Factors Affecting It Within Emergency Department","authors":"Muhammad Irfan Irfan, Mirza Kashif Baig","doi":"10.24083/apjhm.v18i2.1743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed at investigating seven aspects, which are believed to be critical for healthcare customer satisfaction level, as well as determining underlying factors affecting them within the emergency department. Design: A quantitative and cross-sectional study design, with deductive reasoning, was applied to undertake this study. Setting: The study site involves different tertiary care private and public hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. Main Outcome Measures: General satisfaction perspective was measured involving satisfaction with technical quality, interpersonal manner, communication, financial aspects, time spent with the doctor, and accessibility and convenience. Results: Respondents were 61.6% male and 38.4% female with mean age 34.65±10.27 years. Most of the healthcare customers (54.6%) commuted to the healthcare facility by ambulance. 72.2% of respondents were from private and 27.8% were from public healthcare facilities while the majority (55.4%) visits to healthcare emergency services were due to injury or intoxication. In our study mean general satisfaction, technical quality, interpersonal manner, communication, financial aspects, time spent with the doctor, and accessibility and convenience were 3.11±0.34, 3.42±0.37, 3.42±0.43, 3.45±0.39, 3.31±0.42, 2.80±0.58 and 3.46±0.59 respectively. We found 52.6% of healthcare customers were satisfied with general aspects of service, 81.5% satisfied with technical quality, 80.50% satisfied with interpersonal manner, 82.5% satisfied with the communication, 66.3% satisfied with financial aspects, 20.4% satisfied with time spent with doctors and 75.7% satisfied with accessibility and convenience. Conclusion: General satisfaction with services was found to be at the lowest level, while the highest satisfaction level was with the “time spent with the doctor”. Healthcare institutes need to be more attentive to the service encounter time spent with doctors and on general issues for healthcare customers visiting the ED.","PeriodicalId":42935,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v18i2.1743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed at investigating seven aspects, which are believed to be critical for healthcare customer satisfaction level, as well as determining underlying factors affecting them within the emergency department. Design: A quantitative and cross-sectional study design, with deductive reasoning, was applied to undertake this study. Setting: The study site involves different tertiary care private and public hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. Main Outcome Measures: General satisfaction perspective was measured involving satisfaction with technical quality, interpersonal manner, communication, financial aspects, time spent with the doctor, and accessibility and convenience. Results: Respondents were 61.6% male and 38.4% female with mean age 34.65±10.27 years. Most of the healthcare customers (54.6%) commuted to the healthcare facility by ambulance. 72.2% of respondents were from private and 27.8% were from public healthcare facilities while the majority (55.4%) visits to healthcare emergency services were due to injury or intoxication. In our study mean general satisfaction, technical quality, interpersonal manner, communication, financial aspects, time spent with the doctor, and accessibility and convenience were 3.11±0.34, 3.42±0.37, 3.42±0.43, 3.45±0.39, 3.31±0.42, 2.80±0.58 and 3.46±0.59 respectively. We found 52.6% of healthcare customers were satisfied with general aspects of service, 81.5% satisfied with technical quality, 80.50% satisfied with interpersonal manner, 82.5% satisfied with the communication, 66.3% satisfied with financial aspects, 20.4% satisfied with time spent with doctors and 75.7% satisfied with accessibility and convenience. Conclusion: General satisfaction with services was found to be at the lowest level, while the highest satisfaction level was with the “time spent with the doctor”. Healthcare institutes need to be more attentive to the service encounter time spent with doctors and on general issues for healthcare customers visiting the ED.
急诊科医疗保健客户满意度的七个方面及影响因素
目的:本研究旨在调查七个方面,这被认为是医疗保健客户满意度水平的关键,以及确定影响他们在急诊科的潜在因素。设计:采用定量和横断面研究设计,采用演绎推理进行本研究。环境:研究地点涉及巴基斯坦卡拉奇不同的三级保健私立和公立医院。主要结果测量:测量总体满意度,包括对技术质量、人际关系方式、沟通、财务方面、与医生相处的时间、可及性和便利性的满意度。结果:男性占61.6%,女性占38.4%,平均年龄34.65±10.27岁。大多数医疗保健客户(54.6%)乘坐救护车前往医疗保健机构。72.2%的受访者来自私立医疗机构,27.8%的受访者来自公立医疗机构,而大多数(55.4%)的医疗急救服务是由于受伤或中毒。在我们的研究中,总体满意度、技术质量、人际交往方式、沟通、经济方面、与医生相处时间、可及性和便利性分别为3.11±0.34、3.42±0.37、3.42±0.43、3.45±0.39、3.31±0.42、2.80±0.58和3.46±0.59。我们发现52.6%的医疗保健客户对服务的一般方面感到满意,81.5%的人对技术质量感到满意,80.50%的人对人际交往方式感到满意,82.5%的人对沟通感到满意,66.3%的人对财务方面感到满意,20.4%的人对与医生相处的时间感到满意,75.7%的人对可及性和便利性感到满意。结论:总体服务满意度最低,“与医生相处的时间”满意度最高。医疗机构需要更加关注与医生接触的服务时间,以及访问急诊科的医疗保健客户的一般问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
51
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信