{"title":"Burnout and Associated Factors among Thai Anesthesiology Residents","authors":"Neranchala Soonthornkes, Orattha Sakornwattananon, Jitpanu Jirapitakkul, Winitra Nuallaong","doi":"10.33192/smj.v75i10.264582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The study evaluates the prevalence of burnout and the associated risk factors among Thai anesthesiology residents. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted by an online questionnaire and sent 385 anesthesiology residents in Thailand. The questionnaire consisted of a consent form, personal information, potential risk factors of burnout, and the Thai version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (CBI-SS). Results: A total of 248 respondents completed the questionnaire. The overall prevalence of burnout among Thai anesthesiology residents was 35.5%. Sleeping for 5-6 hours (odds ratio 3.68, 95% CI 1.40 to 9.68, p = 0.008), sleeping less than 5 hours (odds ratio 6.89, 95% CI 1.90 to 24.92, p = 0.003), along with dissatisfaction and the idea of discontinuation of training, were associated with higher burnout (odds ratio 8.38, 95% CI 3.65 to 19.25, p < 0.001 and odds ratio 3.11, 95% CI 1.57 to 6.18, p = 0.001, respectively). Compared to first-year residents, second-year residents exhibited a lower risk of burnout (odds ratio 0.32, 95% CI 0.134 to 0.76, p = 0.009) while no significant difference among third-year residents (odds ratio 0.54, p = 0.17, 95% CI 0.25-1.17). Conclusion: The prevalence of burnout among Thai anesthesiology residents was high. Sleeping less than 7 hours, experiencing dissatisfaction, and contemplating discontinuation of training were associated with a higher risk of burnout, while being a second-year resident lowered the risk.","PeriodicalId":37270,"journal":{"name":"Siriraj Medical Journal","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siriraj Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i10.264582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The study evaluates the prevalence of burnout and the associated risk factors among Thai anesthesiology residents. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted by an online questionnaire and sent 385 anesthesiology residents in Thailand. The questionnaire consisted of a consent form, personal information, potential risk factors of burnout, and the Thai version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (CBI-SS). Results: A total of 248 respondents completed the questionnaire. The overall prevalence of burnout among Thai anesthesiology residents was 35.5%. Sleeping for 5-6 hours (odds ratio 3.68, 95% CI 1.40 to 9.68, p = 0.008), sleeping less than 5 hours (odds ratio 6.89, 95% CI 1.90 to 24.92, p = 0.003), along with dissatisfaction and the idea of discontinuation of training, were associated with higher burnout (odds ratio 8.38, 95% CI 3.65 to 19.25, p < 0.001 and odds ratio 3.11, 95% CI 1.57 to 6.18, p = 0.001, respectively). Compared to first-year residents, second-year residents exhibited a lower risk of burnout (odds ratio 0.32, 95% CI 0.134 to 0.76, p = 0.009) while no significant difference among third-year residents (odds ratio 0.54, p = 0.17, 95% CI 0.25-1.17). Conclusion: The prevalence of burnout among Thai anesthesiology residents was high. Sleeping less than 7 hours, experiencing dissatisfaction, and contemplating discontinuation of training were associated with a higher risk of burnout, while being a second-year resident lowered the risk.
目的:了解泰国麻醉科住院医师职业倦怠的患病率及相关危险因素。材料与方法:本横断面研究采用在线问卷调查的方式进行,共向泰国385名麻醉科住院医师发送问卷。问卷包括同意表、个人信息、倦怠的潜在危险因素和泰国版的哥本哈根倦怠量表-学生调查(CBI-SS)。结果:共有248名被调查者完成问卷。泰国麻醉科住院医师的总体倦怠率为35.5%。睡眠5-6小时(优势比3.68,95% CI 1.40 ~ 9.68, p = 0.008)、睡眠不足5小时(优势比6.89,95% CI 1.90 ~ 24.92, p = 0.003)以及不满意和停止训练的想法与较高的倦怠相关(优势比8.38,95% CI 3.65 ~ 19.25, p <0.001,优势比3.11,95% CI分别为1.57 ~ 6.18,p = 0.001)。与第一年住院医师相比,第二年住院医师表现出较低的倦怠风险(优势比0.32,95% CI 0.134 ~ 0.76, p = 0.009),而第三年住院医师之间无显著差异(优势比0.54,p = 0.17, 95% CI 0.25 ~ 1.17)。结论:泰国麻醉科住院医师职业倦怠的发生率较高。睡眠不足7小时,经历不满,考虑停止培训与较高的倦怠风险相关,而第二年住院医师降低了风险。