The ratio of functional literacy and fundamental training of students: the unity of opposites

Elena V. Karpova, Anna V. Nevzorova
{"title":"The ratio of functional literacy and fundamental training of students: the unity of opposites","authors":"Elena V. Karpova, Anna V. Nevzorova","doi":"10.32744/pse.2023.5.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The relevance of the problem of the correlation between functional literacy and fundamental training of students is due to the trends in the development of modern education, the demand for approaches to improving the educational process, as well as the need to systematize and comprehend scientific views on the content and key tasks of general education. The purpose of the article is to analyze the correlation between functional literacy and fundamental training of students from the standpoint of pedagogy and psychology, to present the author's scientific position characterizing the possibility of synthesis of the approaches under consideration. Materials and methods of research. The article presents an analysis of the essence, content, results of research on functional literacy and functional training. A comparative analysis of the two approaches is carried out. There is a need to supplement the pedagogical aspect of the analysis with a theoretical, actually psychological aspect, the content of which is the establishment of patterns and mechanisms on which these approaches are based and their subsequent evaluation. The results of the study. Despite the differences in the understanding of functional literacy and functional training in Russia and abroad, there are common features of these approaches, as well as their distinguishing features are revealed. The main ones are that fundamental training is characterized, first of all, by an orientation towards the formation, primarily, of generalized, abstract knowledge and the possibilities of their transfer. Functional literacy is characterized, in many ways, by opposite attitudes: orientation towards the formation of practice-oriented, specific knowledge. Conclusion. There is a clear, complete correspondence of the paradigm of fundamental training with the “knowledge-skills- automated skills” approach, on the one hand, and a similar degree of completeness correspondence of the paradigm of functional literacy with the competence approach. The fundamental similarity of the ideologies of these approaches, the isomorphism of their basic principles and general orientation are revealed. Their comparison formed the basis for solving the problem of the ratio of fundamental training and functional literacy.","PeriodicalId":37196,"journal":{"name":"Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2023.5.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The relevance of the problem of the correlation between functional literacy and fundamental training of students is due to the trends in the development of modern education, the demand for approaches to improving the educational process, as well as the need to systematize and comprehend scientific views on the content and key tasks of general education. The purpose of the article is to analyze the correlation between functional literacy and fundamental training of students from the standpoint of pedagogy and psychology, to present the author's scientific position characterizing the possibility of synthesis of the approaches under consideration. Materials and methods of research. The article presents an analysis of the essence, content, results of research on functional literacy and functional training. A comparative analysis of the two approaches is carried out. There is a need to supplement the pedagogical aspect of the analysis with a theoretical, actually psychological aspect, the content of which is the establishment of patterns and mechanisms on which these approaches are based and their subsequent evaluation. The results of the study. Despite the differences in the understanding of functional literacy and functional training in Russia and abroad, there are common features of these approaches, as well as their distinguishing features are revealed. The main ones are that fundamental training is characterized, first of all, by an orientation towards the formation, primarily, of generalized, abstract knowledge and the possibilities of their transfer. Functional literacy is characterized, in many ways, by opposite attitudes: orientation towards the formation of practice-oriented, specific knowledge. Conclusion. There is a clear, complete correspondence of the paradigm of fundamental training with the “knowledge-skills- automated skills” approach, on the one hand, and a similar degree of completeness correspondence of the paradigm of functional literacy with the competence approach. The fundamental similarity of the ideologies of these approaches, the isomorphism of their basic principles and general orientation are revealed. Their comparison formed the basis for solving the problem of the ratio of fundamental training and functional literacy.
学生功能素养与基础素养的比例:对立统一
介绍。功能素养与学生基础训练之间的相关性问题的相关性是由于现代教育发展的趋势,对改进教育过程的方法的需求,以及对通识教育内容和重点任务的科学观点的系统化和理解的需要。本文的目的是从教育学和心理学的角度分析功能素养与学生基础训练的关系,并提出作者的科学立场,以表征综合所考虑的方法的可能性。研究材料和方法。本文分析了功能素养与功能训练的本质、内容、研究成果。对这两种方法进行了比较分析。有必要用理论的,实际上是心理学的方面来补充分析的教学方面,其内容是建立这些方法所依据的模式和机制,以及随后的评估。研究的结果。尽管俄罗斯和国外对功能素养和功能训练的理解存在差异,但这些方法有共同的特点,也有各自的特点。主要的是,基础训练的特点,首先是面向形成,主要是泛化的,抽象的知识,以及它们转移的可能性。在许多方面,功能素养的特点是相反的态度:倾向于形成以实践为导向的具体知识。结论。一方面,基础训练范式与“知识技能-自动化技能”方法有明确、完全的对应关系,而功能素养范式与能力方法也有类似程度的完全对应关系。揭示了这些方法在思想上的基本相似性、基本原则和总体取向的同构性。他们的比较构成了解决基础训练和功能素养比例问题的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania
Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
162
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信