Hybrid Approach Using Physical Insights and Data Science for Stuck-Pipe Prediction

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM
SPE Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.2118/218013-pa
Tatsuya Kaneko, Tomoya Inoue, Yujin Nakagawa, Ryota Wada, Shungo Abe, Gota Yasutake, Kazuhiro Fujita
{"title":"Hybrid Approach Using Physical Insights and Data Science for Stuck-Pipe Prediction","authors":"Tatsuya Kaneko, Tomoya Inoue, Yujin Nakagawa, Ryota Wada, Shungo Abe, Gota Yasutake, Kazuhiro Fujita","doi":"10.2118/218013-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Early detection of stuck-pipe incidents is crucial because of the enormous costs of recovering from such incidents. Previous studies have leaned significantly toward a physics-based or data science approach. However, both approaches have challenges, such as the uncertainty of the physics-based model and the lack of data in the data science approach. In this study. we propose a hybrid approach using physical insights and data science and discuss the possibility of stuck-pipe prediction. The proposed method comprises two steps. In the first step, a data-driven model with physical insights is trained using the historical data of the in-situ well to estimate some of the drilling variables. In the second step, the risk of stuck-pipe occurrence (hereafter referred to as sticking risk) is calculated based on the historical and current measured data and the estimation of the trained model. This approach is expected to overcome the limitations of the previous methods as it allows the construction of a detection model tuned to the in-situ well. In the case studies, models for estimating the topdrive torque and standpipe pressure were constructed. The performance of the models is discussed using actual drilling data from drilling fields, including 21 stuck-pipe incidents during drilling operations. The proposed method was first examined using short-term output. The output confirmed that the sticking risk increased shortly (up to 20 hours) before the stuck-pipe incident occurred in 15 cases. This increase in sticking risk was consistent with physical considerations. Subsequently, this study examined the long-term output over several months; this was rarely done in previous studies. Even within this long-term output, some cases had good performance with only a few false alarms, while others had problems with many false alarms. For cases of low performance, several model improvements, such as adding mud information or making the learning and threshold-setting methods more robust to outliers, were found to have the potential to improve performance. The novelty of our research lies in creating a broad framework for the stuck-pipe prediction by using both physical insights and data science methods. The proposed hybrid approach demonstrated the potential to reduce false alarms and improve interpretability compared with previous methods. The framework is highly extensible, and further performance improvements can be expected in the future.","PeriodicalId":22252,"journal":{"name":"SPE Journal","volume":"64 5-6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/218013-pa","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Early detection of stuck-pipe incidents is crucial because of the enormous costs of recovering from such incidents. Previous studies have leaned significantly toward a physics-based or data science approach. However, both approaches have challenges, such as the uncertainty of the physics-based model and the lack of data in the data science approach. In this study. we propose a hybrid approach using physical insights and data science and discuss the possibility of stuck-pipe prediction. The proposed method comprises two steps. In the first step, a data-driven model with physical insights is trained using the historical data of the in-situ well to estimate some of the drilling variables. In the second step, the risk of stuck-pipe occurrence (hereafter referred to as sticking risk) is calculated based on the historical and current measured data and the estimation of the trained model. This approach is expected to overcome the limitations of the previous methods as it allows the construction of a detection model tuned to the in-situ well. In the case studies, models for estimating the topdrive torque and standpipe pressure were constructed. The performance of the models is discussed using actual drilling data from drilling fields, including 21 stuck-pipe incidents during drilling operations. The proposed method was first examined using short-term output. The output confirmed that the sticking risk increased shortly (up to 20 hours) before the stuck-pipe incident occurred in 15 cases. This increase in sticking risk was consistent with physical considerations. Subsequently, this study examined the long-term output over several months; this was rarely done in previous studies. Even within this long-term output, some cases had good performance with only a few false alarms, while others had problems with many false alarms. For cases of low performance, several model improvements, such as adding mud information or making the learning and threshold-setting methods more robust to outliers, were found to have the potential to improve performance. The novelty of our research lies in creating a broad framework for the stuck-pipe prediction by using both physical insights and data science methods. The proposed hybrid approach demonstrated the potential to reduce false alarms and improve interpretability compared with previous methods. The framework is highly extensible, and further performance improvements can be expected in the future.
使用物理洞察和数据科学进行卡钻预测的混合方法
由于从此类事故中恢复的成本巨大,因此早期发现卡钻事故至关重要。以前的研究明显倾向于基于物理或数据科学的方法。然而,这两种方法都存在挑战,例如基于物理的模型的不确定性以及数据科学方法中数据的缺乏。在这项研究中。我们提出了一种使用物理洞察力和数据科学的混合方法,并讨论了卡钻预测的可能性。该方法包括两个步骤。第一步,使用现场井的历史数据来训练具有物理洞察力的数据驱动模型,以估计一些钻井变量。第二步,根据历史和当前的测量数据以及训练好的模型的估计,计算卡管发生的风险(以下简称卡管风险)。该方法有望克服以前方法的局限性,因为它允许构建适合于原位井的检测模型。在实例研究中,建立了估算顶驱扭矩和立管压力的模型。利用钻井现场的实际钻井数据,包括钻井作业中的21起卡钻事故,对模型的性能进行了讨论。首先用短期产出检验了所提出的方法。输出结果证实,在15例卡钻事故发生之前,卡钻风险增加了不久(长达20小时)。粘连风险的增加与身体因素是一致的。随后,本研究考察了几个月的长期产出;在以前的研究中很少这样做。即使在这个长期输出中,有些情况下只有少数假警报,而其他情况下有许多假警报的问题。对于性能较低的情况,一些模型改进,如添加泥浆信息或使学习和阈值设置方法对异常值更具鲁棒性,被发现有可能提高性能。我们研究的新颖之处在于,通过使用物理洞察力和数据科学方法,为卡钻预测创建了一个广泛的框架。与以前的方法相比,所提出的混合方法具有减少误报和提高可解释性的潜力。该框架是高度可扩展的,未来还会有进一步的性能改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SPE Journal
SPE Journal 工程技术-工程:石油
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
229
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Covers theories and emerging concepts spanning all aspects of engineering for oil and gas exploration and production, including reservoir characterization, multiphase flow, drilling dynamics, well architecture, gas well deliverability, numerical simulation, enhanced oil recovery, CO2 sequestration, and benchmarking and performance indicators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信