Screen Shots: State Violence on Camera in Israel and Palestine by Rebecca L. Stein (review)

IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY
Joel Stokes
{"title":"Screen Shots: State Violence on Camera in Israel and Palestine by Rebecca L. Stein (review)","authors":"Joel Stokes","doi":"10.1353/ajs.2023.a911554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Screen Shots: State Violence on Camera in Israel and Palestine by Rebecca L. Stein Joel Stokes Rebecca L. Stein. Screen Shots: State Violence on Camera in Israel and Palestine. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2021. 234 pp. Rebecca Stein’s 2001 Screen Shots is an ethnography of the camera. The book charts the relationship and respective agency between the camera, its bearer, and the photographic subject(s), set against the often violently and politically contested spaces of Israel-Palestine. While Stein’s source material is now several years old (collected since 2010), this book is as much a glimpse into the future of the Israeli-Palestinian context as its recent (2000 to present) history. Interviews with employees of Israeli NGO B’tselem, numerous Palestinian activists, Israel [End Page 497] Defense Forces (IDF) officials, and Jewish settlers in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) create a rich ethnographic narrative that grapples with the realities of the ever-more complicated ethical and legal frameworks of violent footage. Stein’s writing is lucid; presenting the reader with a well-constructed and considered argument. Despite the book’s quality and readability, it is not, however, a text for Israel-Palestine studies beginners. For educators, supplementary texts on Israel’s occupation over Palestinians such as Saree Makdisi’s Palestine Inside Out (2008) and Rashid Khalidi’s The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine (2020) are advisable. The need for additional material is compounded by Stein’s mini-malist introductory outline of related literature. This is not a criticism but worth noting. As a researcher/educator working in Israel-Palestine, I found that Stein’s work evidences extensive ethnographic research potential. In chapter 1, Stein begins her thesis framing the camera as an agent caught between being a tool for change or further conflict, alluding to later discussion regarding Israeli and Palestinian claims of legitimacy and authenticity. In doing so, Stein sets out for the reader the human stakes in the study context, most poignantly how possession of mobile phones (and therefore portable cameras) in Gaza between 2008–2009 made Palestinian civilians “legitimate” targets for aggression under IDF policy. Although detailed and well written, Stein’s early analysis can at times be repetitive, and could be sharpened. The introductory chapter brings the reader’s attention to the second of many photographs included in the book, notably that of Elor Azaria on the cover of Makor rishon magazine as “Man of the Year.” Here is as good of a place as any to note that, given the content of the book, Stein’s use of pictures throughout is refreshing in that it does not seek to entertain images for a shock factor. Stein’s interpretation of photographs is sophisticated, considered, and multifaceted. This is a strength of Stein’s work that should not be overlooked. In the second chapter, Stein continues to follow the work of B’tselem in the OPT. In an important shift of policy, Stein rightly highlights the significance of B’tselem’s 2016 decision to “cease all formal work with the military law enforcement system” (60). This decision has continued to shape the conflict and the pathways to justice and/or retribution for those oppressed by the Israeli military. Early in chapter 2, the reader is struck by the parallels of Stein’s content with the events of May 2022, wherein Shireen Abu Akleh, a Palestinian American journalist, was shot dead while working—in full “PRESS” attire—in the northern West Bank city of Jenin. Abu Akleh’s death symbolizes a continuation of the patterns of IDF violence against Palestinian camera bearers outlined by Stein. Paradoxically, Stein notes that Palestinian camera bearers well known to the IDF during the 2010s seem to have been met with more leniency. Chapter 3, “Settler Scripts,” presents a complicated scene of truth determinism. Stein portrays a reality whereby both Palestinians and Israeli settlers feel their narrative is being silenced, which only leads to further refusals to listen and observe. Chapter 3 neatly displays the echo chambers of knowledge formation different groups operate within, and the dangers such isolation can foster. The main example Stein presents of conflicting narratives around recorded footage is the evolution of Israeli responses...","PeriodicalId":54106,"journal":{"name":"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies","volume":"22 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ajs.2023.a911554","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Screen Shots: State Violence on Camera in Israel and Palestine by Rebecca L. Stein Joel Stokes Rebecca L. Stein. Screen Shots: State Violence on Camera in Israel and Palestine. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2021. 234 pp. Rebecca Stein’s 2001 Screen Shots is an ethnography of the camera. The book charts the relationship and respective agency between the camera, its bearer, and the photographic subject(s), set against the often violently and politically contested spaces of Israel-Palestine. While Stein’s source material is now several years old (collected since 2010), this book is as much a glimpse into the future of the Israeli-Palestinian context as its recent (2000 to present) history. Interviews with employees of Israeli NGO B’tselem, numerous Palestinian activists, Israel [End Page 497] Defense Forces (IDF) officials, and Jewish settlers in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) create a rich ethnographic narrative that grapples with the realities of the ever-more complicated ethical and legal frameworks of violent footage. Stein’s writing is lucid; presenting the reader with a well-constructed and considered argument. Despite the book’s quality and readability, it is not, however, a text for Israel-Palestine studies beginners. For educators, supplementary texts on Israel’s occupation over Palestinians such as Saree Makdisi’s Palestine Inside Out (2008) and Rashid Khalidi’s The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine (2020) are advisable. The need for additional material is compounded by Stein’s mini-malist introductory outline of related literature. This is not a criticism but worth noting. As a researcher/educator working in Israel-Palestine, I found that Stein’s work evidences extensive ethnographic research potential. In chapter 1, Stein begins her thesis framing the camera as an agent caught between being a tool for change or further conflict, alluding to later discussion regarding Israeli and Palestinian claims of legitimacy and authenticity. In doing so, Stein sets out for the reader the human stakes in the study context, most poignantly how possession of mobile phones (and therefore portable cameras) in Gaza between 2008–2009 made Palestinian civilians “legitimate” targets for aggression under IDF policy. Although detailed and well written, Stein’s early analysis can at times be repetitive, and could be sharpened. The introductory chapter brings the reader’s attention to the second of many photographs included in the book, notably that of Elor Azaria on the cover of Makor rishon magazine as “Man of the Year.” Here is as good of a place as any to note that, given the content of the book, Stein’s use of pictures throughout is refreshing in that it does not seek to entertain images for a shock factor. Stein’s interpretation of photographs is sophisticated, considered, and multifaceted. This is a strength of Stein’s work that should not be overlooked. In the second chapter, Stein continues to follow the work of B’tselem in the OPT. In an important shift of policy, Stein rightly highlights the significance of B’tselem’s 2016 decision to “cease all formal work with the military law enforcement system” (60). This decision has continued to shape the conflict and the pathways to justice and/or retribution for those oppressed by the Israeli military. Early in chapter 2, the reader is struck by the parallels of Stein’s content with the events of May 2022, wherein Shireen Abu Akleh, a Palestinian American journalist, was shot dead while working—in full “PRESS” attire—in the northern West Bank city of Jenin. Abu Akleh’s death symbolizes a continuation of the patterns of IDF violence against Palestinian camera bearers outlined by Stein. Paradoxically, Stein notes that Palestinian camera bearers well known to the IDF during the 2010s seem to have been met with more leniency. Chapter 3, “Settler Scripts,” presents a complicated scene of truth determinism. Stein portrays a reality whereby both Palestinians and Israeli settlers feel their narrative is being silenced, which only leads to further refusals to listen and observe. Chapter 3 neatly displays the echo chambers of knowledge formation different groups operate within, and the dangers such isolation can foster. The main example Stein presents of conflicting narratives around recorded footage is the evolution of Israeli responses...
《屏幕截图:以色列和巴勒斯坦镜头下的国家暴力》丽贝卡·l·斯坦著
书评:《屏幕截图:以色列和巴勒斯坦镜头下的国家暴力》,作者:丽贝卡·l·斯坦屏幕截图:以色列和巴勒斯坦的国家暴力镜头。加州斯坦福:斯坦福大学出版社,2021。瑞贝卡·斯坦的《2001年屏幕截图》是一部关于照相机的民族志。这本书描绘了相机、相机持有者和摄影对象之间的关系和各自的作用,以反对以色列-巴勒斯坦经常发生暴力和政治争议的空间。虽然斯坦的原始材料已经有几年的历史了(从2010年开始收集),但这本书是对以色列-巴勒斯坦背景的未来的一瞥,也是对其最近(2000年至今)历史的一瞥。对以色列非政府组织B 'tselem的雇员、众多巴勒斯坦活动人士、以色列国防军(IDF)官员和巴勒斯坦被占领土(OPT)的犹太定居者的采访,创造了丰富的民族志叙事,努力应对暴力镜头日益复杂的道德和法律框架的现实。斯坦因的作品清晰明了;向读者呈现一个构造良好、经过深思熟虑的论点。尽管这本书的质量和可读性,然而,它不是一个文本的以色列-巴勒斯坦研究的初学者。对于教育工作者来说,关于以色列占领巴勒斯坦的补充教材是可取的,比如Saree Makdisi的《巴勒斯坦Inside Out》(2008)和Rashid Khalidi的《对巴勒斯坦的百年战争》(2020)。斯坦因对相关文献的简要介绍使得对额外材料的需求更加复杂。这不是批评,但值得注意。作为一名在以色列-巴勒斯坦工作的研究人员/教育工作者,我发现斯坦因的工作证明了广泛的民族志研究潜力。在第一章中,斯坦开始了她的论文,将相机作为一种代理人,夹在变革或进一步冲突的工具之间,暗指后来关于以色列和巴勒斯坦声称的合法性和真实性的讨论。在此过程中,斯坦因向读者阐述了研究背景下的人类利益,最令人心焦的是,2008年至2009年在加沙拥有移动电话(以及便携式相机)如何使巴勒斯坦平民成为以色列国防军政策下“合法的”侵略目标。斯坦因的早期分析虽然详细且写得很好,但有时可能会重复,并且可能会更加尖锐。引言一章将读者的注意力引到书中包含的许多照片中的第二张,特别是埃洛·阿扎里亚(Elor Azaria)在《马克尔·里松》杂志(Makor rishon)封面上的“年度人物”照片。这里需要指出的是,考虑到这本书的内容,斯坦对图片的使用是令人耳目一新的,因为它没有寻求娱乐图像的冲击因素。斯坦因对照片的解读是复杂的、深思熟虑的、多方面的。这是斯坦因作品的一个不容忽视的优点。在第二章中,Stein继续关注B 'tselem在被占领土的工作。在一个重要的政策转变中,Stein正确地强调了B 'tselem 2016年决定“停止与军事执法系统的所有正式工作”的重要性(60)。这一决定继续影响着冲突以及为受以色列军队压迫的人伸张正义和(或)报复的途径。在第二章的开头,读者对斯坦因的内容与2022年5月发生的事件的相似之处感到震惊,当时,巴勒斯坦裔美国记者希琳·阿布·阿克莱(Shireen Abu Akleh)在约旦河西岸北部城市杰宁(Jenin)工作时被枪杀,当时她穿着“PRESS”的服装。阿布·阿克勒之死象征着斯坦因概述的以色列国防军对巴勒斯坦照相机携带者的暴力模式的延续。矛盾的是,斯坦因指出,在2010年代,以色列国防军所熟知的巴勒斯坦相机持有者似乎得到了更宽松的待遇。第三章,“移民脚本”,呈现了一个复杂的真理决定论的场景。斯坦因描绘了这样一个现实,即巴勒斯坦人和以色列定居者都觉得他们的叙述被压制了,这只会导致他们进一步拒绝倾听和观察。第三章整齐地展示了不同群体在其中运作的知识形成的回音室,以及这种隔离可能造成的危险。斯坦因提出的关于记录片段的冲突叙述的主要例子是以色列反应的演变……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信