Towards the Mystical Experience of Modernity: The Making of Rav Kook, 1865–1904 by Yehudah Mirsky (review)

IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY
Hanoch Ben Pazi
{"title":"Towards the Mystical Experience of Modernity: The Making of Rav Kook, 1865–1904 by Yehudah Mirsky (review)","authors":"Hanoch Ben Pazi","doi":"10.1353/ajs.2023.a911539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Towards the Mystical Experience of Modernity: The Making of Rav Kook, 1865–1904 by Yehudah Mirsky Hanoch Ben Pazi Yehudah Mirsky. Towards the Mystical Experience of Modernity: The Making of Rav Kook, 1865–1904. Boston: Academic Studies Press, 2021. 392 pp. I would like to consider this book from two different perspectives: the first, from an academic point of view, and the second, from a cultural perspective. It is not immediately clear which of these perspectives is more important, and, in fact, this suggests that both perspectives should be considered alongside one another, as they work in parallel. Rabbi Avraham Yiẓḥak ha-Cohen Kook was one of the prominent figures of the rabbinate and Zionist thought in the twentieth century. His name and reputation became iconic in Israeli society, and his theology was instructive in the formation of Israeli Religious Zionist thought. However, his teachings are neither studied nor familiar in Jewish circles outside of Israel. Yehudah Mirsky rejuvenates Jewish discourse about Rav Kook’s writings, and resituates his theology on the global philosophical landscape, through a new perspective on the search for the idea of mystical experience. The unique thought of Rav Kook has preoccupied Israeli research for about forty years, whether in terms of its historical context, its political context, or the kabbalistic tradition. Despite Rav Kook’s significance in these fields and his role as the chief rabbi of ʾEreẓ Yisraʾel, he only reached his special status as forerunner of Religious Zionist thought through the development of Israeli right-wing politics. In the years after the Six-Day War, Rav Kook’s later writings came to characterize his persona and thought. His books began to be viewed as part of the classic literature of Religious Zionists, who found in them spiritual inspiration as well as a strong religious authority upon which to build their national Zionist concept. As a result, the entire engagement with Rav Kook referred to his writings after his immigration to Israel in 1904, regarding the Zionist movement, Zionist struggles, and the theological meaning of Zionist history. The writings of his youth have all but disappeared from research and are conspicuously missing from the classic bookshelves of his writings. Mirsky’s book, which is the result of in-depth and comprehensive research, reveals hitherto unknown information and conclusions on the early period of Rav Kook’s life. This includes the author’s close examination of the period of Rav Kook’s life in Ziemel (Ziemelis, Lithuania) as well as of his first rabbinate in Boisk (Bauska, Latvia). Mirsky succeeds in doing what many have tried and failed to do. Instead of seeking out the hidden roots of Rav Kook’s [End Page 465] thinking, he dares his readers to honestly engage with the literature and thought of these different eras of his life and their historical and conceptual context. By reflecting on and analyzing Kook’s eastern European period alongside the history of the Jews of Lithuania, Mirsky sets out a new study of the young Rav Kook within the cultural and spiritual context in which he grew up, which saw tension between Hasidim and Mitnagdim, internal tensions of the Musar movement and spiritual searching, among other issues. Admittedly, Rav Kook’s followers, or the scholars who unequivocally admire the image and personality that he has come to represent, will likely claim that this research “dwarfs” the uniqueness of the man, his creativity in writing Torah, and certainly the boldness of his thought. It is also possible that others will come forward and argue that Mirsky’s approach in examining the beginnings of Rav Kook’s teachings and development misses what they view as the greater story: the history of the Zionist movement. But Mirsky’s responses to these claims emerge from the study itself, which describes Rav Kook’s halakhic works within the Lithuanian rabbinical context, his kabbalistic and Hasidic interests in their historical contexts, and his literary and poetic motivations amid the newspapers and monthlies of eastern Europe. Gradually, from this meticulous attention to the many details, Rav Kook’s unique character is revealed precisely against the background of the environment in which he grew up. From now...","PeriodicalId":54106,"journal":{"name":"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies","volume":"22 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ajs.2023.a911539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Towards the Mystical Experience of Modernity: The Making of Rav Kook, 1865–1904 by Yehudah Mirsky Hanoch Ben Pazi Yehudah Mirsky. Towards the Mystical Experience of Modernity: The Making of Rav Kook, 1865–1904. Boston: Academic Studies Press, 2021. 392 pp. I would like to consider this book from two different perspectives: the first, from an academic point of view, and the second, from a cultural perspective. It is not immediately clear which of these perspectives is more important, and, in fact, this suggests that both perspectives should be considered alongside one another, as they work in parallel. Rabbi Avraham Yiẓḥak ha-Cohen Kook was one of the prominent figures of the rabbinate and Zionist thought in the twentieth century. His name and reputation became iconic in Israeli society, and his theology was instructive in the formation of Israeli Religious Zionist thought. However, his teachings are neither studied nor familiar in Jewish circles outside of Israel. Yehudah Mirsky rejuvenates Jewish discourse about Rav Kook’s writings, and resituates his theology on the global philosophical landscape, through a new perspective on the search for the idea of mystical experience. The unique thought of Rav Kook has preoccupied Israeli research for about forty years, whether in terms of its historical context, its political context, or the kabbalistic tradition. Despite Rav Kook’s significance in these fields and his role as the chief rabbi of ʾEreẓ Yisraʾel, he only reached his special status as forerunner of Religious Zionist thought through the development of Israeli right-wing politics. In the years after the Six-Day War, Rav Kook’s later writings came to characterize his persona and thought. His books began to be viewed as part of the classic literature of Religious Zionists, who found in them spiritual inspiration as well as a strong religious authority upon which to build their national Zionist concept. As a result, the entire engagement with Rav Kook referred to his writings after his immigration to Israel in 1904, regarding the Zionist movement, Zionist struggles, and the theological meaning of Zionist history. The writings of his youth have all but disappeared from research and are conspicuously missing from the classic bookshelves of his writings. Mirsky’s book, which is the result of in-depth and comprehensive research, reveals hitherto unknown information and conclusions on the early period of Rav Kook’s life. This includes the author’s close examination of the period of Rav Kook’s life in Ziemel (Ziemelis, Lithuania) as well as of his first rabbinate in Boisk (Bauska, Latvia). Mirsky succeeds in doing what many have tried and failed to do. Instead of seeking out the hidden roots of Rav Kook’s [End Page 465] thinking, he dares his readers to honestly engage with the literature and thought of these different eras of his life and their historical and conceptual context. By reflecting on and analyzing Kook’s eastern European period alongside the history of the Jews of Lithuania, Mirsky sets out a new study of the young Rav Kook within the cultural and spiritual context in which he grew up, which saw tension between Hasidim and Mitnagdim, internal tensions of the Musar movement and spiritual searching, among other issues. Admittedly, Rav Kook’s followers, or the scholars who unequivocally admire the image and personality that he has come to represent, will likely claim that this research “dwarfs” the uniqueness of the man, his creativity in writing Torah, and certainly the boldness of his thought. It is also possible that others will come forward and argue that Mirsky’s approach in examining the beginnings of Rav Kook’s teachings and development misses what they view as the greater story: the history of the Zionist movement. But Mirsky’s responses to these claims emerge from the study itself, which describes Rav Kook’s halakhic works within the Lithuanian rabbinical context, his kabbalistic and Hasidic interests in their historical contexts, and his literary and poetic motivations amid the newspapers and monthlies of eastern Europe. Gradually, from this meticulous attention to the many details, Rav Kook’s unique character is revealed precisely against the background of the environment in which he grew up. From now...
走向现代性的神秘经验:《拉夫·库克的创作,1865-1904》,作者:耶胡达·米尔斯基(书评)
书评:《走向现代性的神秘经验:拉夫库克的制作,1865-1904》,作者:耶胡达·米尔斯基。走向现代性的神秘经验:拉夫·库克的创作,1865-1904。波士顿:学术研究出版社,2021。我想从两个不同的角度来考虑这本书:第一个是从学术角度来看,第二个是从文化角度来看。目前还不清楚哪一种观点更重要,事实上,这表明这两种观点应该一起考虑,因为它们是并行工作的。拉比亚伯拉罕Yiẓḥak哈科恩库克是二十世纪拉比和犹太复国主义思想的杰出人物之一。他的名字和声誉成为以色列社会的标志性人物,他的神学对以色列宗教犹太复国主义思想的形成具有指导意义。然而,他的教义在以色列以外的犹太人圈子里既不被研究也不被熟悉。耶胡达·米尔斯基(Yehudah Mirsky)通过寻找神秘体验的新视角,复兴了犹太人对拉夫·库克(Rav Kook)著作的论述,并在全球哲学景观中保留了他的神学。Rav Kook的独特思想在以色列的研究中占据了大约40年的时间,无论是在其历史背景、政治背景还是卡巴拉传统方面。尽管Rav Kook在这些领域具有重要意义,而且他是《犹太复国主义》的首席拉比,但他作为宗教犹太复国主义思想先驱的特殊地位是通过以色列右翼政治的发展而获得的。在六日战争之后的几年里,拉夫·库克后来的作品逐渐体现了他的个性和思想。他的书开始被视为宗教犹太复国主义者经典文学的一部分,他们在其中找到了精神灵感和强大的宗教权威,以此为基础建立了他们的民族犹太复国主义概念。因此,与Rav Kook的整个接触都涉及他在1904年移民到以色列后的著作,涉及犹太复国主义运动、犹太复国主义斗争和犹太复国主义历史的神学意义。他年轻时的作品几乎从研究中消失了,在他经典作品的书架上也明显不见了。米尔斯基的书是深入而全面的研究的结果,揭示了迄今为止未知的关于拉夫·库克早年生活的信息和结论。这包括作者对Rav Kook在Ziemel (Ziemelis,立陶宛)的生活时期以及他在Boisk (Bauska,拉脱维亚)的第一位拉比的仔细研究。米尔斯基成功地做了许多人尝试过却没能做到的事情。他没有去寻找Rav Kook思想的隐藏根源,而是鼓励读者诚实地参与他生活中不同时代的文学和思想,以及它们的历史和概念背景。通过反思和分析Kook的东欧时期以及立陶宛犹太人的历史,米尔斯基在他成长的文化和精神背景下对年轻的Rav Kook进行了新的研究,在他成长的文化和精神背景下,看到了哈西德派和米纳格丁派之间的紧张关系,穆萨运动和精神探索的内部紧张关系,以及其他问题。无可否认,拉夫·库克的追随者,或者那些毫不含糊地钦佩他所代表的形象和个性的学者,可能会声称,这项研究“贬低”了这个人的独特性,他在写《托拉》方面的创造力,当然还有他思想的大胆。也有可能,其他人会站出来争辩说,米尔斯基在研究拉夫·库克的教义和发展的开端时,忽略了他们认为更伟大的故事:犹太复国主义运动的历史。但米尔斯基对这些说法的回应来自研究本身,研究描述了拉夫库克在立陶宛拉比背景下的哈拉基作品,他在历史背景下的卡巴拉派和哈西德派的兴趣,以及他在东欧报纸和月刊中的文学和诗歌动机。渐渐地,从这种对许多细节的细致关注中,Rav Kook的独特性格正是在他成长的环境背景下显露出来的。从现在开始…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信