The Death Wish in the Hebrew Bible: Rhetorical Strategies for Survival by Hanne Løland Levinson (review)

IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY
Amy Kalmanofsky
{"title":"The Death Wish in the Hebrew Bible: Rhetorical Strategies for Survival by Hanne Løland Levinson (review)","authors":"Amy Kalmanofsky","doi":"10.1353/ajs.2023.a911531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: The Death Wish in the Hebrew Bible: Rhetorical Strategies for Survival by Hanne Løland Levinson Amy Kalmanofsky Hanne Løland Levinson. The Death Wish in the Hebrew Bible: Rhetorical Strategies for Survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. 275 pp. Most of us have used some version of “kill me now” to apply rhetorical punch to an expression of dislike or frustration. We intentionally employ hyperbolic speech to make clear our distaste and objections. When we hear others use such expressions, especially those for whom we are responsible, we must assess how seriously we should take these statements. Similarly, when we encounter biblical characters who express death wishes, we should consider how literally to interpret them. Despite its morbid topic, Hanne Løland Levinson offers a fascinating, accessible, and even enjoyable analysis of biblical death-wish texts. In The Death Wish in the Hebrew Bible: Rhetorical Strategies for Survival, Løland Levinson examines the rhetorical intent of biblical texts within which characters express their desire to die or to be dead, a difference Løland Levinson explicates in her study. By placing these death-wish texts in conversation with each other, Løland Levinson discovers a variety of reasons characters express the desire to die or to be dead. Death wishes can reflect a character’s genuine desire to die. They can also express a character’s pain and are used as a negotiation tactic for altering their life’s circumstances. In the introductory first chapter, Løland Levinson presents the criteria for identifying death-wish texts and her methodology for analyzing them. Formulated in direct speech, generally addressed to someone in the second person, whether human or divine, death wishes frequently appear as conditional statements that can be direct appeals to die or be killed, or as indirect statements that question a character’s life’s worth. The dialogical element of death-wish texts is critical to Løland Levinson, who employs conversation analysis, the systematic analysis of talk in everyday interactions, in her case studies of these texts. Chapter 2 considers the death wish as a negotiation strategy in which the weaker party in the negotiation ups the stakes of the negotiation by uttering a death wish. Rachel in Genesis 30 and Moses in Numbers 11 provide Løland Levinson with convincing examples of characters who bargain with their lives. Rachel wants sons and Moses wants help managing the rebellious Israelites. In Løland Levinson’s reading, both characters express existential distress, but they do so to alter their circumstances. Their strategy works. Rachel has a son and Moses gets help with the appointment of the seventy elders. Chapter 3 examines death wishes that communicate anger and despair. The prophets Elijah and Jonah do not negotiate with their lives, as Moses and Rachel do. Instead, these prophets express a genuine desire to die. According to Løland Levinson, Elijah wishes to die in 1 Kings 19:4 from despair while Jonah wishes to die in Jonah 4:3, 8–9 from anger. For both, death is a way out of being a prophet. Their lives have become unbearable. Interestingly, notes Løland Levinson, God grants neither prophet his request. By appointing a successor, Elijah does get some professional relief, but he does not die. In fact, Løland Levinson keenly observes, Elijah never dies. Unlike Elijah, Jonah receives no consolation. His anger remains unresolved at the book’s conclusion. [End Page 446] In chapter 4, Løland Levinson considers the unique death-wish motif found in Job and Jeremiah. Instead of expressing the desire to end their lives, Job (3:11–16) and Jeremiah (20:18) express the desire to eradicate their lives. They wish they had never been born to avoid the suffering experienced in their lives. Løland Levinson interestingly distinguishes between the desire to eradicate one’s life from the desire to die or to be killed, and argues that Jeremiah and Job, unlike Elijah and Jonah, do not long for death as relief from their suffering. Rather, they wish to have never been born to experience the suffering in the first place. Chapter 5 examines death wishes as expressions of wishful thinking...","PeriodicalId":54106,"journal":{"name":"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies","volume":"23 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJS Review-The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ajs.2023.a911531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: The Death Wish in the Hebrew Bible: Rhetorical Strategies for Survival by Hanne Løland Levinson Amy Kalmanofsky Hanne Løland Levinson. The Death Wish in the Hebrew Bible: Rhetorical Strategies for Survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. 275 pp. Most of us have used some version of “kill me now” to apply rhetorical punch to an expression of dislike or frustration. We intentionally employ hyperbolic speech to make clear our distaste and objections. When we hear others use such expressions, especially those for whom we are responsible, we must assess how seriously we should take these statements. Similarly, when we encounter biblical characters who express death wishes, we should consider how literally to interpret them. Despite its morbid topic, Hanne Løland Levinson offers a fascinating, accessible, and even enjoyable analysis of biblical death-wish texts. In The Death Wish in the Hebrew Bible: Rhetorical Strategies for Survival, Løland Levinson examines the rhetorical intent of biblical texts within which characters express their desire to die or to be dead, a difference Løland Levinson explicates in her study. By placing these death-wish texts in conversation with each other, Løland Levinson discovers a variety of reasons characters express the desire to die or to be dead. Death wishes can reflect a character’s genuine desire to die. They can also express a character’s pain and are used as a negotiation tactic for altering their life’s circumstances. In the introductory first chapter, Løland Levinson presents the criteria for identifying death-wish texts and her methodology for analyzing them. Formulated in direct speech, generally addressed to someone in the second person, whether human or divine, death wishes frequently appear as conditional statements that can be direct appeals to die or be killed, or as indirect statements that question a character’s life’s worth. The dialogical element of death-wish texts is critical to Løland Levinson, who employs conversation analysis, the systematic analysis of talk in everyday interactions, in her case studies of these texts. Chapter 2 considers the death wish as a negotiation strategy in which the weaker party in the negotiation ups the stakes of the negotiation by uttering a death wish. Rachel in Genesis 30 and Moses in Numbers 11 provide Løland Levinson with convincing examples of characters who bargain with their lives. Rachel wants sons and Moses wants help managing the rebellious Israelites. In Løland Levinson’s reading, both characters express existential distress, but they do so to alter their circumstances. Their strategy works. Rachel has a son and Moses gets help with the appointment of the seventy elders. Chapter 3 examines death wishes that communicate anger and despair. The prophets Elijah and Jonah do not negotiate with their lives, as Moses and Rachel do. Instead, these prophets express a genuine desire to die. According to Løland Levinson, Elijah wishes to die in 1 Kings 19:4 from despair while Jonah wishes to die in Jonah 4:3, 8–9 from anger. For both, death is a way out of being a prophet. Their lives have become unbearable. Interestingly, notes Løland Levinson, God grants neither prophet his request. By appointing a successor, Elijah does get some professional relief, but he does not die. In fact, Løland Levinson keenly observes, Elijah never dies. Unlike Elijah, Jonah receives no consolation. His anger remains unresolved at the book’s conclusion. [End Page 446] In chapter 4, Løland Levinson considers the unique death-wish motif found in Job and Jeremiah. Instead of expressing the desire to end their lives, Job (3:11–16) and Jeremiah (20:18) express the desire to eradicate their lives. They wish they had never been born to avoid the suffering experienced in their lives. Løland Levinson interestingly distinguishes between the desire to eradicate one’s life from the desire to die or to be killed, and argues that Jeremiah and Job, unlike Elijah and Jonah, do not long for death as relief from their suffering. Rather, they wish to have never been born to experience the suffering in the first place. Chapter 5 examines death wishes as expressions of wishful thinking...
《希伯来圣经中的死亡愿望:生存的修辞策略》作者:汉娜·洛兰德·莱文森(书评)
《希伯来圣经中的死亡愿望:生存的修辞策略》作者:汉娜·l·兰·莱文森希伯来圣经中的死亡愿望:生存的修辞策略。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2021。我们大多数人都用过某种版本的“现在杀了我”来表达不喜欢或沮丧。我们故意用夸张的语言来表达我们的厌恶和反对。当我们听到别人使用这样的表达,特别是那些我们要为之负责的人,我们必须评估我们应该如何认真对待这些说法。同样,当我们遇到表达死亡愿望的圣经人物时,我们应该考虑如何从字面上解释它们。尽管这是一个病态的话题,但汉娜·l·兰德·莱文森对圣经中有关死亡的文本进行了引人入胜、通俗易懂、甚至令人愉快的分析。在《希伯来圣经中的死亡愿望:生存的修辞策略》一书中,Løland Levinson研究了圣经文本中的修辞意图,其中人物表达了他们对死亡或死亡的渴望,Løland Levinson在她的研究中解释了这一差异。Løland Levinson通过将这些死亡愿望文本置于彼此之间的对话中,发现了人物表达死亡或死亡愿望的各种原因。死亡愿望可以反映角色对死亡的真实渴望。它们也可以表达角色的痛苦,并被用作改变他们生活环境的谈判策略。在第一章的导论中,Løland Levinson提出了识别“死亡愿望”文本的标准和她分析这些文本的方法。死亡愿望通常以第二人称(无论是人还是神)表达,通常以条件语句的形式出现,可以直接呼吁死亡或被杀,也可以作为质疑角色生命价值的间接语句。对Løland Levinson来说,死亡愿望文本的对话元素至关重要,她在这些文本的案例研究中采用了对话分析,即对日常互动中的谈话进行系统分析。第二章认为死亡意愿是一种谈判弱势方通过表达死亡意愿来提高谈判风险的谈判策略。《创世纪》第30章中的雷切尔和《民数记》第11章中的摩西为Løland Levinson提供了令人信服的例子,说明了人物是如何拿自己的生命做交易的。拉结想要儿子,摩西想要帮助管理叛逆的以色列人。在Løland Levinson的阅读中,两个角色都表达了存在的痛苦,但他们这样做是为了改变他们的环境。他们的策略奏效了。拉结生了一个儿子,摩西得到了委派七十个长老的帮助。第三章探讨了表达愤怒和绝望的死亡愿望。先知以利亚和约拿不像摩西和拉结那样拿自己的性命来讨价还价。相反,这些先知表达了一种对死亡的真实渴望。根据Løland Levinson的说法,在列王纪上19:4中,以利亚希望因绝望而死,而约拿在约拿书4:3,8-9中希望因愤怒而死。对他们两人来说,死亡是一种摆脱先知身份的方式。他们的生活变得难以忍受。有趣的是,Løland Levinson指出,上帝没有满足先知的要求。通过任命继任者,以利亚确实得到了一些职业上的解脱,但他并没有死。事实上,列文森敏锐地观察到,以利亚永远不会死。不像以利亚,约拿得不到安慰。在书的结尾,他的愤怒仍未平息。在第四章中,Løland Levinson考虑了约伯和耶利米独特的死亡愿望主题。约伯(3:11-16)和耶利米(20:18)并没有表达结束自己生命的愿望,而是表达了消灭自己生命的愿望。他们希望自己从未出生,以避免生活中所经历的痛苦。Løland Levinson很有趣地将消灭生命的愿望与死亡或被杀的愿望区分开来,并认为耶利米和约伯与以利亚和约拿不同,他们并不渴望死亡来缓解他们的痛苦。相反,他们希望从一开始就没有经历过苦难。第五章探讨了作为一厢情愿的表达的死亡愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信