{"title":"Victorian Trauma: War, Railway Accidents, and the Vulnerable Body","authors":"Martin Danahay","doi":"10.2979/vic.2023.a911107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In Balaclava (1876) by Elizabeth Thompson (later known as Lady Butler) the central figure of a traumatized survivor of the Charge of the Light Brigade, modeled after real-life veteran of the Charge William Henry Pennington, was criticized as being over-dramatic. The criticism of Pennington's pose and demeanor shows the inability of the Victorian definition of \"shock\" to encompass what today would be termed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A shift in the Victorian model of trauma has been connected to railway travel; unrecognized has been the connection between the discourses on trauma in railway accidents and from warfare based on the vulnerability of the body. The mechanization of transport led to new anxieties about the precarity of the railway passenger's body and engendered an analogy between railway accident trauma and warfare. Surgeon Edwin Morris's A Practical Treatise on Shock After Surgical Operations and Injuries: With Especial Reference to Shock Caused by Railway Accidents (1867) made this connection explicit. Morris considered physical war wounds specific and verifiable but criticized claims against railway companies for the psychological aftereffects of accidents as unverifiable. Morris expressed the fear that both railway passengers and soldiers could simulate the effects of trauma in the absence of any physiological injury that would make their symptoms verifiable, revealing the shortcomings of the Victorian diagnosis of shock and the privileging of physical over psychological wounds.","PeriodicalId":45845,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/vic.2023.a911107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: In Balaclava (1876) by Elizabeth Thompson (later known as Lady Butler) the central figure of a traumatized survivor of the Charge of the Light Brigade, modeled after real-life veteran of the Charge William Henry Pennington, was criticized as being over-dramatic. The criticism of Pennington's pose and demeanor shows the inability of the Victorian definition of "shock" to encompass what today would be termed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A shift in the Victorian model of trauma has been connected to railway travel; unrecognized has been the connection between the discourses on trauma in railway accidents and from warfare based on the vulnerability of the body. The mechanization of transport led to new anxieties about the precarity of the railway passenger's body and engendered an analogy between railway accident trauma and warfare. Surgeon Edwin Morris's A Practical Treatise on Shock After Surgical Operations and Injuries: With Especial Reference to Shock Caused by Railway Accidents (1867) made this connection explicit. Morris considered physical war wounds specific and verifiable but criticized claims against railway companies for the psychological aftereffects of accidents as unverifiable. Morris expressed the fear that both railway passengers and soldiers could simulate the effects of trauma in the absence of any physiological injury that would make their symptoms verifiable, revealing the shortcomings of the Victorian diagnosis of shock and the privileging of physical over psychological wounds.
摘要:伊丽莎白·汤普森(Elizabeth Thompson,后被称为巴特勒夫人)在1876年的《巴拉克拉瓦》(Balaclava)一书中,以威廉·亨利·彭宁顿(William Henry Pennington)的真实老兵为原型,塑造了轻骑兵冲锋中一个受创伤的幸存者的核心形象,但被批评为过于戏剧化。对彭宁顿姿势和举止的批评表明,维多利亚时代对“震惊”的定义无法涵盖今天所谓的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。维多利亚时代创伤模式的转变与铁路旅行有关;关于铁路事故中创伤的论述与基于身体脆弱性的战争之间的联系一直未被认识到。交通运输的机械化导致了对铁路乘客身体不稳定性的新焦虑,并产生了铁路事故创伤与战争之间的类比。外科医生埃德温·莫里斯(Edwin Morris)的《外科手术和损伤后休克的实用论述:特别提到铁路事故引起的休克》(1867)明确了这种联系。莫里斯认为,身体上的战争创伤是具体的、可证实的,但他批评铁路公司因事故造成的心理影响而提出的索赔是无法证实的。莫里斯表达了他的担忧,即铁路乘客和士兵都可能在没有任何生理伤害的情况下模拟创伤的影响,而生理伤害无法证实他们的症状,这揭示了维多利亚时代休克诊断的缺陷,以及对生理创伤的特权高于心理创伤。
期刊介绍:
For more than 50 years, Victorian Studies has been devoted to the study of British culture of the Victorian age. It regularly includes interdisciplinary articles on comparative literature, social and political history, and the histories of education, philosophy, fine arts, economics, law and science, as well as review essays, and an extensive book review section. An annual cumulative and fully searchable bibliography of noteworthy publications that have a bearing on the Victorian period is available electronically and is included in the cost of a subscription. Victorian Studies Online Bibliography