Effective Blended Learning Model Selection Based on Student Learning Style using Analytic Hierarchy Process for an Undergraduate Engineering Course

Q3 Engineering
S. Maidin, M. A. Shahrum, L. Y. Qian, T. K. Rajendran, S. Ismail
{"title":"Effective Blended Learning Model Selection Based on Student Learning Style using Analytic Hierarchy Process for an Undergraduate Engineering Course","authors":"S. Maidin, M. A. Shahrum, L. Y. Qian, T. K. Rajendran, S. Ismail","doi":"10.5829/ije.2023.36.12c.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blended learning is a flexible method conducted through face-to-face and online learning. It requires students to learn by attempting the classes physically and allows them to learn virtually at different times and places. It has become more evident and common after the Movement Control Order (MCO) as most of the lectures at the university are carried out in hybrid mode. The blended learning models create problems and opportunities for students as they need to explore and adapt to different lecturers' different blended learning methods in terms of teaching styles, planning, and timing. Therefore, the objective of this research is to investigate the best-blended learning models for an undergraduate engineering course based on student learning style by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, as it is a big challenge to select the most effective approach for universities to educate, tutor and bring out quality students according to their learning styles. The AHP method is used to aid the students in finding the best-blended learning model based on their learning style. AHP analysis is then conducted to validate and verify its accuracy by comparing it with Visual, Auditory, Read/write, and Kinesthetic (VARK) models. As a result, most students are kinaesthetic learners (72%) based on VARK results, and the face-to-face driver model is the most preferred blended learning model with the priority vector at 31.33% through the AHP analysis. The accuracy of the AHP result is 74% by comparing it with the VARK result. In summary, the data can be deployed in the UTeM blended learning system to improve the course design and student learning experience.","PeriodicalId":14066,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering - Transactions C: Aspects","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering - Transactions C: Aspects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2023.36.12c.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blended learning is a flexible method conducted through face-to-face and online learning. It requires students to learn by attempting the classes physically and allows them to learn virtually at different times and places. It has become more evident and common after the Movement Control Order (MCO) as most of the lectures at the university are carried out in hybrid mode. The blended learning models create problems and opportunities for students as they need to explore and adapt to different lecturers' different blended learning methods in terms of teaching styles, planning, and timing. Therefore, the objective of this research is to investigate the best-blended learning models for an undergraduate engineering course based on student learning style by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, as it is a big challenge to select the most effective approach for universities to educate, tutor and bring out quality students according to their learning styles. The AHP method is used to aid the students in finding the best-blended learning model based on their learning style. AHP analysis is then conducted to validate and verify its accuracy by comparing it with Visual, Auditory, Read/write, and Kinesthetic (VARK) models. As a result, most students are kinaesthetic learners (72%) based on VARK results, and the face-to-face driver model is the most preferred blended learning model with the priority vector at 31.33% through the AHP analysis. The accuracy of the AHP result is 74% by comparing it with the VARK result. In summary, the data can be deployed in the UTeM blended learning system to improve the course design and student learning experience.
基于学生学习风格的层次分析法的有效混合学习模式选择
混合式学习是一种通过面对面和在线学习进行的灵活方法。它要求学生通过实际尝试来学习,并允许他们在不同的时间和地点进行虚拟学习。在运动控制令(MCO)之后,由于大学的大部分讲座都是以混合模式进行的,这种情况变得更加明显和普遍。混合式学习模式给学生带来了问题和机会,因为他们需要探索和适应不同讲师在教学风格、计划和时间方面的不同混合式学习方法。因此,本研究的目的是利用层次分析法(AHP)探讨基于学生学习风格的本科工程课程最佳混合学习模式,因为大学如何根据学生的学习风格选择最有效的教育、指导和培养优质学生是一个巨大的挑战。层次分析法用于帮助学生根据自己的学习风格找到最佳的混合学习模式。然后进行AHP分析,通过将其与视觉、听觉、读写和动觉(VARK)模型进行比较来验证和验证其准确性。因此,从VARK结果来看,大多数学生是动觉型学习者(72%),通过AHP分析,面对面驱动模式是最受欢迎的混合学习模式,优先向量为31.33%。AHP结果与VARK结果比较,准确率为74%。综上所述,这些数据可以部署在UTeM混合学习系统中,以改善课程设计和学生的学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信