Allocation of Liability for Bank Card Theft

{"title":"Allocation of Liability for Bank Card Theft","authors":"","doi":"10.23977/law.2023.021007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Supreme Court issued a new judicial interpretation on bank card theft in May 2021, which determined the no-fault liability of banks in the phenomenon of bank card theft. However, although the interpretation is based on the position of protecting financial consumers, it does not take into account the type of cardholder, the difference between counterfeit card theft and cyber theft. Through differentiate between Small-value electronic fund transfers and large-value electronic fund transfers, cyber theft, a new mechanism for allocating responsibility should be constructed for cyber-skimming of bank card unit accounts: if the bank's payment instructions have passed the security procedures, the cardholder bears the presumption of liability for fault, thus providing banks with an outlet for exemption from liability.","PeriodicalId":271650,"journal":{"name":"Science of Law Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2023.021007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Supreme Court issued a new judicial interpretation on bank card theft in May 2021, which determined the no-fault liability of banks in the phenomenon of bank card theft. However, although the interpretation is based on the position of protecting financial consumers, it does not take into account the type of cardholder, the difference between counterfeit card theft and cyber theft. Through differentiate between Small-value electronic fund transfers and large-value electronic fund transfers, cyber theft, a new mechanism for allocating responsibility should be constructed for cyber-skimming of bank card unit accounts: if the bank's payment instructions have passed the security procedures, the cardholder bears the presumption of liability for fault, thus providing banks with an outlet for exemption from liability.
银行卡盗窃的责任分配
最高法院于2021年5月发布了新的银行卡盗窃司法解释,明确了银行在银行卡盗窃现象中的无过错责任。然而,虽然解释是基于保护金融消费者的立场,但它没有考虑到持卡人的类型,伪造卡盗窃与网络盗窃的区别。通过区分小额电子资金转账和大额电子资金转账、网络盗窃,构建一种新的银行卡单位账户网络盗刷责任分配机制:如果银行的支付指令通过了安全程序,持卡人承担过错责任推定,为银行提供了免责出口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信