Should the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act be amended to include electronic signatures for the sale of immovable property in South Africa?

Q3 Social Sciences
Nirissa Reddy
{"title":"Should the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act be amended to include electronic signatures for the sale of immovable property in South Africa?","authors":"Nirissa Reddy","doi":"10.47348/salj/v140/i4a5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electronic signatures have become a core feature of digital transformation. Organisations can now transact with greater ease, regardless of physical distance or national borders. The Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002 facilitates electronic communications and transactions using electronic documents and signatures in South Africa. Electronic contracts and signatures are legally binding and constitute valid and admissible evidence in legal proceedings, although there are a few exceptions. One of the exclusions concerns agreements for the sale of immovable property. The Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981, which regulates the sale of land, seeks to promote legal certainty as to the authenticity and contents of these contracts to limit instances of fraud and litigation. This article examines the risk associated with fraud and the case of Borcherds v Duxbury 2021 (1) SA 410 (ECP). In this case, contrary to legislation, the court accepted an electronic signature in a contract for the sale of immovable property. I recommend that the relevant legislation be amended to validate the use of advanced electronic signatures for the sale of immovable property. A holistic approach to electronic signatures is the only way to embrace an inevitable and complete digital transformation.","PeriodicalId":39313,"journal":{"name":"South African law journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47348/salj/v140/i4a5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electronic signatures have become a core feature of digital transformation. Organisations can now transact with greater ease, regardless of physical distance or national borders. The Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002 facilitates electronic communications and transactions using electronic documents and signatures in South Africa. Electronic contracts and signatures are legally binding and constitute valid and admissible evidence in legal proceedings, although there are a few exceptions. One of the exclusions concerns agreements for the sale of immovable property. The Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981, which regulates the sale of land, seeks to promote legal certainty as to the authenticity and contents of these contracts to limit instances of fraud and litigation. This article examines the risk associated with fraud and the case of Borcherds v Duxbury 2021 (1) SA 410 (ECP). In this case, contrary to legislation, the court accepted an electronic signature in a contract for the sale of immovable property. I recommend that the relevant legislation be amended to validate the use of advanced electronic signatures for the sale of immovable property. A holistic approach to electronic signatures is the only way to embrace an inevitable and complete digital transformation.
是否应该修改《电子通信和交易法》,使其包括南非出售不动产的电子签名?
电子签名已成为数字化转型的核心特征。组织现在可以更轻松地进行交易,而不受物理距离或国界的限制。2002年第25号电子通信和交易法促进了南非使用电子文件和签名的电子通信和交易。电子合同和签名具有法律约束力,在法律诉讼中构成有效和可接受的证据,但也有少数例外。其中一项排除条款涉及不动产买卖协议。1981年第68号《土地转让法》规定了土地的出售,旨在提高对这些合同的真实性和内容的法律确定性,以限制欺诈和诉讼的情况。本文探讨了与欺诈相关的风险以及Borcherds诉Duxbury 2021 (1) SA 410 (ECP)一案。在本案中,法院违反法律规定,接受了不动产买卖合同中的电子签名。我建议修订有关法例,以验证在出售不动产时使用先进的电子签署。电子签名的整体方法是拥抱不可避免的和完整的数字转换的唯一途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African law journal
South African law journal Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信