Tadalafil vs Tamsulosin for the Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Randomised Clinical Trial

A Venkata Ranga Swamy, Jandhyam Manikantan, D Raja Reddy, Mutyasri Pedapathnapu, K Sitha Ramaiah, A Bhagavan
{"title":"Tadalafil vs Tamsulosin for the Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Randomised Clinical Trial","authors":"A Venkata Ranga Swamy, Jandhyam Manikantan, D Raja Reddy, Mutyasri Pedapathnapu, K Sitha Ramaiah, A Bhagavan","doi":"10.7860/ijars/2023/61995.2918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Tadalafil and tamsulosin have both been approved for use in the management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS). Limited studies have shown the efficacy of tadalafil in terms of maximum urinary output flow (Qmax) and post-void residual (PVR). Aim: To compare the efficacy of tadalafil 5 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg in patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods: A prospective, open-label, Randomised clinical study was conducted in the Department of Urology at Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India. The study duration was one year and five months, from February 2015 to July 2016. A total of 83 patients clinically diagnosed with BPH were included, but 23 patients were excluded from the analysis due to lost follow-up. The remaining 60 patients were randomly assigned to two groups: one receiving tadalafil 5 mg (n=30) and the other receiving tamsulosin 0.4 mg (n=30) for 12 weeks. Demographic characteristics, total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), individual IPSS, Quality of Life (QoL) score, Qmax, PVR, and differences in symptoms were analysed. Data were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann-Whitney U test. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age for group I (tadalafil 5 mg) and Group II (tamsulosin 0.4 mg) was 62.7 and 61.0 years, respectively (p=0.147). Patients who received tadalafil showed significantly higher efficacy in all measures from baseline to 12 weeks, including increased Qmax (12.0 mL/sec vs 15.1 mL/sec), reduced QoL scores (4.2 vs 3.7), and PVR (26.5 mL vs 15.8 mL), compared to tamsulosin where the increase in Qmax was 11.6 mL/sec vs 13.6 mL/sec, reduction in QoL scores was 4.1 vs 2.4, and PVR was 24.0 mL vs 16.2 mL, between baseline and 12 weeks. Conclusion: Tadalafil 5 mg is a recent drug option available for the treatment of LUTS-BPH. The efficacy and safety of tadalafil 5 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg are comparable.","PeriodicalId":56235,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Anatomy Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7860/ijars/2023/61995.2918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tadalafil and tamsulosin have both been approved for use in the management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS). Limited studies have shown the efficacy of tadalafil in terms of maximum urinary output flow (Qmax) and post-void residual (PVR). Aim: To compare the efficacy of tadalafil 5 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg in patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods: A prospective, open-label, Randomised clinical study was conducted in the Department of Urology at Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India. The study duration was one year and five months, from February 2015 to July 2016. A total of 83 patients clinically diagnosed with BPH were included, but 23 patients were excluded from the analysis due to lost follow-up. The remaining 60 patients were randomly assigned to two groups: one receiving tadalafil 5 mg (n=30) and the other receiving tamsulosin 0.4 mg (n=30) for 12 weeks. Demographic characteristics, total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), individual IPSS, Quality of Life (QoL) score, Qmax, PVR, and differences in symptoms were analysed. Data were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann-Whitney U test. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age for group I (tadalafil 5 mg) and Group II (tamsulosin 0.4 mg) was 62.7 and 61.0 years, respectively (p=0.147). Patients who received tadalafil showed significantly higher efficacy in all measures from baseline to 12 weeks, including increased Qmax (12.0 mL/sec vs 15.1 mL/sec), reduced QoL scores (4.2 vs 3.7), and PVR (26.5 mL vs 15.8 mL), compared to tamsulosin where the increase in Qmax was 11.6 mL/sec vs 13.6 mL/sec, reduction in QoL scores was 4.1 vs 2.4, and PVR was 24.0 mL vs 16.2 mL, between baseline and 12 weeks. Conclusion: Tadalafil 5 mg is a recent drug option available for the treatment of LUTS-BPH. The efficacy and safety of tadalafil 5 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg are comparable.
他达拉非与坦索罗辛治疗良性前列腺增生男性下尿路症状:一项随机临床试验
他达拉非和坦索罗辛都已被批准用于治疗下尿路症状(LUTS)。有限的研究表明他达拉非在最大尿输出流量(Qmax)和尿后残留(PVR)方面的有效性。目的:比较他达拉非5mg与坦索罗辛0.4 mg治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的疗效。材料和方法:在印度安得拉邦Kurnool医学院泌尿科进行了一项前瞻性、开放标签、随机临床研究。研究时间为一年零五个月,从2015年2月至2016年7月。共纳入83例临床诊断为BPH的患者,但有23例患者因失去随访而被排除在分析之外。其余60例患者随机分为两组:一组接受他达拉非5 mg (n=30),另一组接受坦索罗辛0.4 mg (n=30),疗程12周。分析人口学特征、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、个体IPSS、生活质量(QoL)评分、Qmax、PVR和症状差异。数据分析采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和Mann-Whitney U检验。p值0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:I组(他达拉非5 mg)和II组(坦索罗辛0.4 mg)患者的平均年龄分别为62.7岁和61.0岁(p=0.147)。从基线到12周,接受他达拉非的患者在所有测量中都显示出显着更高的疗效,包括Qmax增加(12.0 mL/sec vs 15.1 mL/sec), QoL评分降低(4.2 vs 3.7)和PVR (26.5 mL vs 15.8 mL),与坦索罗辛相比,Qmax增加11.6 mL/sec vs 13.6 mL/sec, QoL评分降低4.1 vs 2.4, PVR为24.0 mL vs 16.2 mL,基线和12周。结论:他达拉非5mg是治疗LUTS-BPH的最新药物选择。他达拉非5mg与坦索罗辛0.4 mg的疗效和安全性相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信