Perception of entrepreneurs regarding public policies in fighting Covid-19

Q3 Social Sciences
Claudia M. S. Bezerra, Heidy R. Ramos, Eudes V. Bezerra, Marco A. C. Teixeira, Marcos F. Magalhães
{"title":"Perception of entrepreneurs regarding public policies in fighting Covid-19","authors":"Claudia M. S. Bezerra, Heidy R. Ramos, Eudes V. Bezerra, Marco A. C. Teixeira, Marcos F. Magalhães","doi":"10.1590/1678-6971/eramd230068.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose: The research analyzed the perception of entrepreneurs in the cities of São Paulo and São Luis regarding if the public policies implemented during the pandemic were sufficient to face the Covid-19 crisis and how they contributed to the survival of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), in adverse situations. Originality/value: Faced with the advance of the Covid-19 contagion curve, governments worldwide have adopted measures to contain the disease. Such efforts negatively impacted organizations, especially MSMEs, which are more susceptible to the effects of the crisis. In these situations, the role of the State in promoting public policies to face the crisis is fundamental. It can represent the difference between survival and recovery versus the closure of business activities. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative research with an exploratory, descriptive approach was developed through an empirical study carried out in two stages, combining the answers of a questionnaire in Google Forms and interviews with 48 entrepreneurs from MSMEs in the cities of São Paulo and São Luís. Content analysis was supported by Atlas.ti software. Findings: Five categories of public policies were created: 1. financial, 2. tributaries, 3. operational, 4. politicians, and 5. health. In adverse situations, government support is essential for the survival and recovery of MSMEs. It was concluded that although the support policies have been considered insufficient by surveyed entrepreneurs, those who managed to gain access reported that they were essential for maintaining the business.","PeriodicalId":37120,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Administracao Mackenzie","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Administracao Mackenzie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eramd230068.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: The research analyzed the perception of entrepreneurs in the cities of São Paulo and São Luis regarding if the public policies implemented during the pandemic were sufficient to face the Covid-19 crisis and how they contributed to the survival of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), in adverse situations. Originality/value: Faced with the advance of the Covid-19 contagion curve, governments worldwide have adopted measures to contain the disease. Such efforts negatively impacted organizations, especially MSMEs, which are more susceptible to the effects of the crisis. In these situations, the role of the State in promoting public policies to face the crisis is fundamental. It can represent the difference between survival and recovery versus the closure of business activities. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative research with an exploratory, descriptive approach was developed through an empirical study carried out in two stages, combining the answers of a questionnaire in Google Forms and interviews with 48 entrepreneurs from MSMEs in the cities of São Paulo and São Luís. Content analysis was supported by Atlas.ti software. Findings: Five categories of public policies were created: 1. financial, 2. tributaries, 3. operational, 4. politicians, and 5. health. In adverse situations, government support is essential for the survival and recovery of MSMEs. It was concluded that although the support policies have been considered insufficient by surveyed entrepreneurs, those who managed to gain access reported that they were essential for maintaining the business.
企业家对抗疫公共政策的看法
摘要目的:本研究分析了圣保罗市和圣路易斯市的企业家对疫情期间实施的公共政策是否足以应对新冠肺炎危机的看法,以及这些政策如何帮助中小微企业(MSMEs)在不利形势下的生存。独创性/价值:面对新冠肺炎疫情传播曲线的走高,各国政府纷纷采取防控措施。这种努力对组织产生了负面影响,尤其是中小微企业,它们更容易受到危机的影响。在这些情况下,国家在促进应对危机的公共政策方面的作用是至关重要的。它可以代表生存和恢复与商业活动关闭之间的区别。设计/方法/方法:通过两个阶段的实证研究,结合谷歌表格问卷的答案和对来自圣保罗市和圣保罗市Luís的48名中小微企业企业家的采访,开发了一项带有探索性,描述性方法的定性研究。内容分析由Atlas支持。ti的软件。研究发现:制定了五类公共政策:1。金融、2。支流,3。操作4。5.政治家。健康。在不利的情况下,政府的支持对中小微企业的生存和复苏至关重要。结论是,虽然被调查的企业家认为支助政策不够充分,但那些设法进入的企业家报告说,支助政策对维持业务是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Administracao Mackenzie
Revista de Administracao Mackenzie Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信