Assessment and comparison of anticholinergic exposure in older adults at a Basic Health Unit in Porto Alegre

Tatiana da Silva Sempé, Taiane Santos Garcia, Isabela Heineck
{"title":"Assessment and comparison of anticholinergic exposure in older adults at a Basic Health Unit in Porto Alegre","authors":"Tatiana da Silva Sempé, Taiane Santos Garcia, Isabela Heineck","doi":"10.53886/gga.e2200098_en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To estimate the anticholinergic burden in geriatric patients using two scales and to assess the degree of agreement between them. Methods: Data from an observational study conducted in a primary health care service were used. Anticholinergic burden was assessed using the Belgian Scale Muscarinic Acetylcholinergic Receptor ANTagonist Exposure Scale and the Brazilian Scale of Medicines with Anticholinergic Activity. The cumulative anticholinergic burden score was classified using a categorical approach: Brazilian scale (0: none; 1 – 2: low; ≥ 3: high) and Belgian scale (0: none; 0.5 – 1.5: low; ≥ 2: high). The degree of agreement between the two instruments was obtained through Cohen’s kappa coefficient. Results: A total of 374 older people were included, most of them female and aged between 60 and 69 years. At least one potentially inappropriate drug with anticholinergic activity was used by 60.70% of patients according to the Brazilian scale and 32.89% by the Belgian scale. On average, 20.85% were under high anticholinergic exposure. Overall, on both scales, the most commonly recurrent medications were those indicated for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Agreement between the scales was moderate (Kappa = 0.43). Conclusions: A high percentage of older adults was exposed to drugs with an anticholinergic burden, posing risks to health and quality of life. Consensus is needed on how anticholinergic burden is calculated by these scores, as well as standardization of the list of included drugs.","PeriodicalId":52782,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53886/gga.e2200098_en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the anticholinergic burden in geriatric patients using two scales and to assess the degree of agreement between them. Methods: Data from an observational study conducted in a primary health care service were used. Anticholinergic burden was assessed using the Belgian Scale Muscarinic Acetylcholinergic Receptor ANTagonist Exposure Scale and the Brazilian Scale of Medicines with Anticholinergic Activity. The cumulative anticholinergic burden score was classified using a categorical approach: Brazilian scale (0: none; 1 – 2: low; ≥ 3: high) and Belgian scale (0: none; 0.5 – 1.5: low; ≥ 2: high). The degree of agreement between the two instruments was obtained through Cohen’s kappa coefficient. Results: A total of 374 older people were included, most of them female and aged between 60 and 69 years. At least one potentially inappropriate drug with anticholinergic activity was used by 60.70% of patients according to the Brazilian scale and 32.89% by the Belgian scale. On average, 20.85% were under high anticholinergic exposure. Overall, on both scales, the most commonly recurrent medications were those indicated for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Agreement between the scales was moderate (Kappa = 0.43). Conclusions: A high percentage of older adults was exposed to drugs with an anticholinergic burden, posing risks to health and quality of life. Consensus is needed on how anticholinergic burden is calculated by these scores, as well as standardization of the list of included drugs.
评估和比较在阿雷格里港的一个基本卫生单位的老年人抗胆碱能暴露
目的:用两种量表评估老年患者的抗胆碱能负荷,并评价它们之间的一致程度。方法:采用一项在初级卫生保健服务机构进行的观察性研究的数据。采用比利时毒蕈碱类乙酰胆碱受体拮抗剂暴露量表和巴西抗胆碱能药物活性量表评估抗胆碱能负荷。累积抗胆碱能负荷评分采用分类方法进行分类:巴西量表(0:无;1 - 2:低;≥3:高)和比利时量表(0:无;0.5 - 1.5:低;≥2:高)。两种仪器之间的一致程度是通过科恩的卡帕系数得到的。结果:共纳入374名老年人,以女性居多,年龄在60 ~ 69岁之间。根据巴西量表,60.70%的患者至少使用了一种具有抗胆碱能活性的潜在不适当药物,比利时量表为32.89%。平均20.85%处于高抗胆碱能暴露状态。总的来说,在这两个量表上,最常见的复发药物是那些用于治疗精神疾病的药物。量表间的一致性为中等(Kappa = 0.43)。结论:高比例的老年人暴露于具有抗胆碱能负担的药物,对健康和生活质量构成风险。如何通过这些评分来计算抗胆碱能负荷,以及纳入药物清单的标准化,需要达成共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信