Redeeming Bigger Thomas: Rashid Johnson and Suzan-Lori Parks’s “Woke” Native Son

IF 0.3 Q4 WOMENS STUDIES
Charles I. Nero
{"title":"Redeeming Bigger Thomas: Rashid Johnson and Suzan-Lori Parks’s “Woke” Native Son","authors":"Charles I. Nero","doi":"10.1353/pal.2023.a906874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Redeeming Bigger ThomasRashid Johnson and Suzan-Lori Parks’s “Woke” Native Son Charles I. Nero (bio) Rashid Johnson’s HBO production of Richard Wright’s Native Son is a “woke” adaptation of the classic novel. By “woke,” I refer to the use of the term as a metaphor for being alert and/or aware of systemic racism. The term “woke” became popular in African American culture at the end of the twentieth century as can be seen quite spectacularly in some of Spike Lee’s films, notably in his 1988 School Daze, set in Atlanta over homecoming weekend at the historically Black Mission College. The film presents gendered practices such as fraternity hazing, colorism, and hair texture bias as the fallout upon Black people of systemic racism. In Lee’s film, these practices result in acts of profound cruelty that African American students commit against each other, often for the sake of social mobility and in-group solidarity. The film ends at dawn on a Sunday morning when the film’s protagonist yells “Wake up!” while ringing the school’s antique bell to summon the college residents to the college’s quad. Once all have gathered, the protagonist breaks cinema’s “fourth wall,” to directly address the viewing audience by stating calmly “Wake Up!”1 The film insists that combating systemic and institutional racism, including its internalization by people of color, requires that one be “woke.” Rashid Johnson and the screenplay writer Suzan-Lori Parks use this idea of being woke in the adaptation of Richard Wright’s Native Son broadcast on HBO in 2019.2 Johnson and Parks use wokeness to redeem Bigger’s toxic masculinity in their adaptation of the novel. We recall that Wright’s Bigger Thomas is not likable or a character with whom a reader relates by any stretch of the imagination. Wright’s Bigger is violent, sadistic, and cruel. Bigger murders a white woman, and although it was not his intention to do so, he decides to dispose of the body by dismembering [End Page 99] it and putting the remains in a furnace. Upon realizing that he cannot take his African American girlfriend Bessie with him to escape the police, Bigger rapes her, smashes her head with a brick, and throws her barely living body through an airshaft onto the snow-covered ground. Because Bigger is such an unsavory character, your attention as a reader gravitates toward what produced him and his version of masculinity. His grim behavior causes the reader to ask themself, “How did Bigger come to exist?” Is this a character who has not known love and affection? What circumstances have led to someone so devoid of empathy? Of course, these are questions whose answers point to the novel as an example of “naturalism,” the literary movement begun in the late nineteenth century that argued that environment, social forces, and even heredity shaped the actions of a character. Wright’s Native Son is an example of naturalism with its unsparing attention to the details of Bigger’s impoverished environment, defined through signs of lack: an absent father, a mother whose love for him is in doubt, no privacy for four people in a cramped one-room apartment, and little chance for upward mobility. All of this lack points to the near absence of any civilizing tools that might redeem Bigger and his performance of masculinity. Wright’s Native Son and its emphatic description of Bigger’s lack is an indictment of America and its commitment to white supremacy. It cannot be lost upon the reader that the lack of civilizing tools—family, love, employment, and the prospect of upward economic mobility—in Bigger’s life is a consequence of white supremacy that demands a disposable underclass of people. The United States racializes that class of people with a permanent group of African Americans to fulfill its need for cheap, unskilled labor. Wright’s Bigger is an alien to civilization, so he is an unsuitable character for Johnson’s “woke” adaptation. Redeeming Bigger requires that he be a civilized member of society. Civilizing Bigger through Social Class Changes In the film...","PeriodicalId":41105,"journal":{"name":"Palimpsest-A Journal on Women Gender and the Black International","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palimpsest-A Journal on Women Gender and the Black International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pal.2023.a906874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Redeeming Bigger ThomasRashid Johnson and Suzan-Lori Parks’s “Woke” Native Son Charles I. Nero (bio) Rashid Johnson’s HBO production of Richard Wright’s Native Son is a “woke” adaptation of the classic novel. By “woke,” I refer to the use of the term as a metaphor for being alert and/or aware of systemic racism. The term “woke” became popular in African American culture at the end of the twentieth century as can be seen quite spectacularly in some of Spike Lee’s films, notably in his 1988 School Daze, set in Atlanta over homecoming weekend at the historically Black Mission College. The film presents gendered practices such as fraternity hazing, colorism, and hair texture bias as the fallout upon Black people of systemic racism. In Lee’s film, these practices result in acts of profound cruelty that African American students commit against each other, often for the sake of social mobility and in-group solidarity. The film ends at dawn on a Sunday morning when the film’s protagonist yells “Wake up!” while ringing the school’s antique bell to summon the college residents to the college’s quad. Once all have gathered, the protagonist breaks cinema’s “fourth wall,” to directly address the viewing audience by stating calmly “Wake Up!”1 The film insists that combating systemic and institutional racism, including its internalization by people of color, requires that one be “woke.” Rashid Johnson and the screenplay writer Suzan-Lori Parks use this idea of being woke in the adaptation of Richard Wright’s Native Son broadcast on HBO in 2019.2 Johnson and Parks use wokeness to redeem Bigger’s toxic masculinity in their adaptation of the novel. We recall that Wright’s Bigger Thomas is not likable or a character with whom a reader relates by any stretch of the imagination. Wright’s Bigger is violent, sadistic, and cruel. Bigger murders a white woman, and although it was not his intention to do so, he decides to dispose of the body by dismembering [End Page 99] it and putting the remains in a furnace. Upon realizing that he cannot take his African American girlfriend Bessie with him to escape the police, Bigger rapes her, smashes her head with a brick, and throws her barely living body through an airshaft onto the snow-covered ground. Because Bigger is such an unsavory character, your attention as a reader gravitates toward what produced him and his version of masculinity. His grim behavior causes the reader to ask themself, “How did Bigger come to exist?” Is this a character who has not known love and affection? What circumstances have led to someone so devoid of empathy? Of course, these are questions whose answers point to the novel as an example of “naturalism,” the literary movement begun in the late nineteenth century that argued that environment, social forces, and even heredity shaped the actions of a character. Wright’s Native Son is an example of naturalism with its unsparing attention to the details of Bigger’s impoverished environment, defined through signs of lack: an absent father, a mother whose love for him is in doubt, no privacy for four people in a cramped one-room apartment, and little chance for upward mobility. All of this lack points to the near absence of any civilizing tools that might redeem Bigger and his performance of masculinity. Wright’s Native Son and its emphatic description of Bigger’s lack is an indictment of America and its commitment to white supremacy. It cannot be lost upon the reader that the lack of civilizing tools—family, love, employment, and the prospect of upward economic mobility—in Bigger’s life is a consequence of white supremacy that demands a disposable underclass of people. The United States racializes that class of people with a permanent group of African Americans to fulfill its need for cheap, unskilled labor. Wright’s Bigger is an alien to civilization, so he is an unsuitable character for Johnson’s “woke” adaptation. Redeeming Bigger requires that he be a civilized member of society. Civilizing Bigger through Social Class Changes In the film...
救赎更大的托马斯:拉希德·约翰逊和苏珊·洛里·帕克斯的“觉醒”本土儿子
拉希德·约翰逊(Rashid Johnson)和苏珊·洛莉·帕克斯(susan - lori Parks)的《苏醒的》原著《查理一世》(Charles I. Nero)(传记)拉希德·约翰逊(Rashid Johnson)由HBO电视台制作,改编自理查德·赖特(Richard Wright)的《苏醒的》原著。所谓“觉醒”,我指的是用这个词来比喻警惕和/或意识到系统性的种族主义。“觉醒”这个词在20世纪末开始在非裔美国人文化中流行起来,这在斯派克·李的一些电影中可以看到,尤其是在他1988年的《校园迷情》中,故事发生在亚特兰大历史悠久的黑人使命学院的返校节周末。这部电影展示了诸如兄弟会欺侮、肤色歧视和发质偏见等性别行为,作为系统性种族主义对黑人的影响。在李安的电影中,这些做法导致非裔美国学生相互之间犯下了深刻的残酷行为,往往是为了社会流动性和群体内团结。电影在一个周日的黎明结束,电影的主角喊道:“醒醒!”一边按响学校的古色古香的钟,把学院的学生召集到学院的院子里。当所有人都聚集在一起时,主角打破了电影的“第四堵墙”,平静地对观众说:“醒醒!”这部电影坚持认为,与系统性和体制性的种族主义作斗争,包括有色人种对种族主义的内化,需要一个人“觉醒”。拉希德·约翰逊和编剧苏珊-洛里·帕克斯在2019年HBO播出的理查德·赖特的《土子》改编中使用了这种清醒的想法。约翰逊和帕克斯在改编小说中利用清醒来弥补比格的有毒男子气概。我们记得,赖特的《大托马斯》既不讨人喜欢,也不是一个读者可以通过想象与之产生联系的角色。赖特的《Bigger》充满了暴力、虐待和残忍。比格谋杀了一名白人女性,尽管这不是他的本意,但他还是决定肢解尸体,然后把尸体扔进炉子里。当他意识到他不能带着他的非裔美国女友贝西一起逃离警察时,Bigger强奸了她,用砖头打碎了她的头,并把她奄奄一息的身体扔进了一个通风井,扔在了白雪覆盖的地上。因为比格是一个如此令人讨厌的角色,作为读者,你的注意力会被吸引到是什么造就了他,以及他对男子气概的看法上。他冷酷的行为让读者不禁自问:“比格是怎么出现的?”这是一个不懂得爱和感情的人吗?是什么情况导致一个人如此缺乏同理心?当然,这些问题的答案指向小说作为“自然主义”的一个例子,“自然主义”是19世纪后期开始的文学运动,认为环境,社会力量,甚至遗传因素塑造了人物的行为。赖特的《本土之子》是自然主义的一个例子,它毫不吝啬地关注了比格的贫困环境的细节,通过缺乏的迹象来定义:一个缺席的父亲,一个对他的爱充满怀疑的母亲,四个人在一个狭窄的一室公寓里没有隐私,几乎没有向上流动的机会。所有这些缺失都表明,几乎没有任何教化工具可以弥补比格和他的男子气概表现。赖特的《土生土长的儿子》及其对比格的匮乏的有力描述,是对美国及其对白人至上主义的承诺的控诉。读者不会忘记,在比格的生活中,缺乏文明化的工具——家庭、爱情、就业和向上经济流动的前景——是白人至上主义的结果,这种优越感要求一个可支配的下层阶级。为了满足对廉价、不熟练劳动力的需求,美国将这一阶层种族化,让非洲裔美国人成为永久群体。赖特饰演的比格是文明的异类,所以他不适合约翰逊的“觉醒”改编。救赎比格需要他成为一个文明的社会成员。通过社会阶层的变化来实现更大的文明在电影中…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信