Examining Knowledge Decay in the Anesthesia Provider—An Integrative Review

Robert Spafford
{"title":"Examining Knowledge Decay in the Anesthesia Provider—An Integrative Review","authors":"Robert Spafford","doi":"10.4236/ojanes.2023.139016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Knowledge decay can be present in a lot of different careers but it is especially important when affecting the anesthesia provider. Knowledge decay can lead to skill decay. Therefore, it leads to worse patient outcomes. It is important to know how knowledge decay occurs and to know how to prevent it. Purpose: The purpose of this review was to explore the contributing factors of knowledge decay while also examining how different learning activities can be used to prevent it from occurring. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane databases, and Embase. The American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology website was also examined. Findings: Knowledge decay usually occurs when either the anesthesia provider is in a new area of practice or when the provider has had a significant amount of time pass since the latest implementation of an anesthesia skill. The type of activity shown to best combat knowledge decay is the use of a simulation-based learning activity. Classroom learning can also help combat knowledge decay, but not to the same extent. Conclusions: The most significant way to prevent knowledge decay in the anesthesia provider is to implement simulation-based learning activities, as well as keep anesthesia providers comfortable with the skills that they practice.","PeriodicalId":56551,"journal":{"name":"麻醉学期刊(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"麻醉学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojanes.2023.139016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Knowledge decay can be present in a lot of different careers but it is especially important when affecting the anesthesia provider. Knowledge decay can lead to skill decay. Therefore, it leads to worse patient outcomes. It is important to know how knowledge decay occurs and to know how to prevent it. Purpose: The purpose of this review was to explore the contributing factors of knowledge decay while also examining how different learning activities can be used to prevent it from occurring. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane databases, and Embase. The American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology website was also examined. Findings: Knowledge decay usually occurs when either the anesthesia provider is in a new area of practice or when the provider has had a significant amount of time pass since the latest implementation of an anesthesia skill. The type of activity shown to best combat knowledge decay is the use of a simulation-based learning activity. Classroom learning can also help combat knowledge decay, but not to the same extent. Conclusions: The most significant way to prevent knowledge decay in the anesthesia provider is to implement simulation-based learning activities, as well as keep anesthesia providers comfortable with the skills that they practice.
检查麻醉提供者的知识衰减-一项综合综述
背景:知识衰退可以出现在许多不同的职业中,但在影响麻醉提供者时尤为重要。知识的衰退会导致技能的衰退。因此,它会导致更糟糕的患者预后。重要的是要知道知识是如何衰退的,并知道如何防止它。目的:本综述的目的是探讨知识衰退的影响因素,同时研究如何使用不同的学习活动来防止知识衰退的发生。方法:在PubMed、Cochrane和Embase数据库中进行系统的文献检索。美国护士麻醉学协会的网站也进行了调查。发现:知识衰退通常发生在麻醉提供者处于一个新的实践领域,或者当麻醉提供者距离最新实施麻醉技能已有相当长的时间时。最能对抗知识衰退的活动类型是使用基于模拟的学习活动。课堂学习也有助于对抗知识衰退,但程度不同。结论:预防麻醉医师知识衰减的最重要途径是实施基于模拟的学习活动,并使麻醉医师对他们所练习的技能感到舒适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
371
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信