Comparing the potential treatment of biogas effluent by two artificial wetland wastewater treatment systems

{"title":"Comparing the potential treatment of biogas effluent by two artificial wetland wastewater treatment systems","authors":"","doi":"10.37550/tdmu.ejs/2023.03.459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, environmental pollution treatment is one of the most concerning subjects in many countries. Especially the breeding waste treatment has to be taken as a priority. Besides, biogas technology sets up and operates primarily to treat breeding waste. However, this technology formed a considerable amount of wastewater the effluent quality is still poor and the concentration of pollutants is higher than the required national technical regulation (QCVN 62-MT:2016/BTNMT). The study was conducted on two units of horizontal flow constructed Wetland (HFCW) and vertical flow constructed wetland (VFCW). Both of these units were planted with Cyperus involucratus. The study aimed to compare the potential treatment of two artificial wetland systems and find out an appropriate wetland system to reduce environmental pollution from biogas effluent. The results indicated that vertically Flow Constructed Wetlands exhibited a higher treatment efficiency than horizontally Flow Constructed Wetlands with the average removal efficiency for COD, BOD5, TSS, N-NH3, and P-PO43- were 55.2%, 75.3%, 82.3%, 75.9%, and 70.1%, respectively. The results of this study should provide insight into using wetland systems to treat wastewater and show vertical flow constructed wetland potential for improving the quality of biogas wastewater.","PeriodicalId":472196,"journal":{"name":"Tạp chí Đại học Thủ Dầu Một","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tạp chí Đại học Thủ Dầu Một","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37550/tdmu.ejs/2023.03.459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays, environmental pollution treatment is one of the most concerning subjects in many countries. Especially the breeding waste treatment has to be taken as a priority. Besides, biogas technology sets up and operates primarily to treat breeding waste. However, this technology formed a considerable amount of wastewater the effluent quality is still poor and the concentration of pollutants is higher than the required national technical regulation (QCVN 62-MT:2016/BTNMT). The study was conducted on two units of horizontal flow constructed Wetland (HFCW) and vertical flow constructed wetland (VFCW). Both of these units were planted with Cyperus involucratus. The study aimed to compare the potential treatment of two artificial wetland systems and find out an appropriate wetland system to reduce environmental pollution from biogas effluent. The results indicated that vertically Flow Constructed Wetlands exhibited a higher treatment efficiency than horizontally Flow Constructed Wetlands with the average removal efficiency for COD, BOD5, TSS, N-NH3, and P-PO43- were 55.2%, 75.3%, 82.3%, 75.9%, and 70.1%, respectively. The results of this study should provide insight into using wetland systems to treat wastewater and show vertical flow constructed wetland potential for improving the quality of biogas wastewater.
比较两种人工湿地污水处理系统处理沼气废水的潜力
目前,环境污染治理是许多国家最为关注的课题之一。特别是养殖废弃物的处理必须作为重点。此外,沼气技术的建立和运作主要是为了处理养殖废物。然而,该技术形成了相当数量的废水,出水水质仍然较差,污染物浓度高于国家技术法规(QCVN 62-MT:2016/BTNMT)的要求。研究对象为水平流人工湿地(HFCW)和垂直流人工湿地(VFCW)两个单元。这两个单位都种植了渐开线莎草。本研究旨在比较两种人工湿地系统的处理潜力,找出一种合适的湿地系统来减少沼气废水对环境的污染。结果表明,垂直流人工湿地对COD、BOD5、TSS、N-NH3和P-PO43-的平均去除率分别为55.2%、75.3%、82.3%、75.9%和70.1%,处理效果优于水平流人工湿地。本研究结果为利用湿地系统处理废水提供了新的思路,并展示了垂直流人工湿地在改善沼气废水质量方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信