Excessive Evaluation Anxiety (XEA): The Last Two Decades

Nia Seunghye Kang, Katherine Moreau
{"title":"Excessive Evaluation Anxiety (XEA): The Last Two Decades","authors":"Nia Seunghye Kang, Katherine Moreau","doi":"10.56645/jmde.v19i45.701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Excessive evaluation anxiety (XEA) refers to disproportionate or increased evaluation anxiety among those affected by evaluation (e.g., stakeholders) characterized by the sole presence of negative consequences. It can compromise evaluator-stakeholder relationships, presenting as a barrier for program evaluation. Moreover, XEA can both cause and be caused by resistance to evaluation, which is an interrelated topic that shares many common causes, characteristics, and mitigation strategies. The participatory and interactive nature of modern evaluation approaches can exacerbate the presence of XEA. However, researchers have not explored the current state of literature on XEA.
 Purpose: To explore the current state of the literature on XEA over the past 20 years.
 Setting: Not applicable.
 Intervention: Not applicable.
 Research Design: Literature review.
 Data Collection and Analysis: We conducted a literature search of Academic Search Complete, Web of Science, and Scopus. We complemented the database search by a journal search of the American Journal of Evaluation, Evaluation, and the Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. We then conducted a thematic analysis of the articles that met the inclusion criteria.
 Findings: Upon review of the articles, we identified four main themes in the literature related to XEA. Specifically, XEA: leads to poor evaluator-stakeholder relationships; is influenced by cultural factors; can be mitigated through the development of interpersonal skills; and can be mitigated through a systematic and evidence-based approach to evaluation.
 Keywords: Excessive evaluation anxiety, resistance to evaluation, program evaluation, evaluator-stakeholder relationships","PeriodicalId":91909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","volume":"723 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v19i45.701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Excessive evaluation anxiety (XEA) refers to disproportionate or increased evaluation anxiety among those affected by evaluation (e.g., stakeholders) characterized by the sole presence of negative consequences. It can compromise evaluator-stakeholder relationships, presenting as a barrier for program evaluation. Moreover, XEA can both cause and be caused by resistance to evaluation, which is an interrelated topic that shares many common causes, characteristics, and mitigation strategies. The participatory and interactive nature of modern evaluation approaches can exacerbate the presence of XEA. However, researchers have not explored the current state of literature on XEA. Purpose: To explore the current state of the literature on XEA over the past 20 years. Setting: Not applicable. Intervention: Not applicable. Research Design: Literature review. Data Collection and Analysis: We conducted a literature search of Academic Search Complete, Web of Science, and Scopus. We complemented the database search by a journal search of the American Journal of Evaluation, Evaluation, and the Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. We then conducted a thematic analysis of the articles that met the inclusion criteria. Findings: Upon review of the articles, we identified four main themes in the literature related to XEA. Specifically, XEA: leads to poor evaluator-stakeholder relationships; is influenced by cultural factors; can be mitigated through the development of interpersonal skills; and can be mitigated through a systematic and evidence-based approach to evaluation. Keywords: Excessive evaluation anxiety, resistance to evaluation, program evaluation, evaluator-stakeholder relationships
过度评估焦虑(XEA):近二十年
背景:过度评价焦虑(Excessive evaluation anxiety, XEA)是指受评价影响者(如利益相关者)的评价焦虑不成比例或增加,其特征是只存在负面后果。它会损害评估者与涉众之间的关系,成为程序评估的障碍。此外,XEA既可以引起也可以由抵制评估引起,这是一个相互关联的主题,具有许多共同的原因、特征和缓解策略。现代评价方法的参与性和互动性会加剧XEA的存在。然而,研究人员并没有探索关于XEA的文献现状。 目的:探讨近20年来关于XEA的文献现状。 设置:不适用。 干预措施:不适用。 研究设计:文献综述 资料收集与分析:我们在Academic search Complete、Web of Science和Scopus中进行了文献检索。我们通过检索《美国评估杂志》、《评估》和《加拿大项目评估杂志》来补充数据库检索。然后,我们对符合纳入标准的文章进行了专题分析。 研究结果:通过对文章的回顾,我们确定了与XEA相关的文献中的四个主要主题。具体来说,XEA会导致评估者与利益相关者之间的关系不佳;受文化因素的影响;可以通过人际交往能力的发展得到缓解;并且可以通过系统的、以证据为基础的评估方法加以缓解。 关键词:评估过度焦虑,评估阻力,项目评估,评估者-利益相关者关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信