Improvement of Reflection on Teaching Practice in a Training Course That Integrates the Lesson Study and Criteria of Didactical Suitability

Q4 Social Sciences
Viviane Hummes, Adriana Breda, Vicenç Font, María José Seckel
{"title":"Improvement of Reflection on Teaching Practice in a Training Course That Integrates the Lesson Study and Criteria of Didactical Suitability","authors":"Viviane Hummes, Adriana Breda, Vicenç Font, María José Seckel","doi":"10.33423/jhetp.v23i14.6395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses a qualitative case study involving eight mathematics teachers in Brazil. The study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of a training course that combined Lesson Study and Criteria of Didactical Suitability in developing reflective competence in teachers. Lesson Study is a professional development strategy that encourages teachers to collaborate and reflect on their teaching practices, while Criteria of Didactical Suitability is a tool that guides teachers’ reflection. The study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of Criteria of Didactical Suitability in enhancing reflection skills and to assess the participants’ perception of its usefulness. The analysis revealed that participating teachers improved their reflection skills, specifically by utilizing Criteria of Didactical Suitability more effectively in the third phase of the course. However, the study has limitations, such as being conducted virtually and in a specific context. Overall, this study highlights the potential of combining Lesson Study and Criteria of Didactical Suitability in developing reflective competence in teachers. Further research can explore the efficacy of this approach in different contexts.","PeriodicalId":16005,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Higher Education, Theory, and Practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Higher Education, Theory, and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i14.6395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses a qualitative case study involving eight mathematics teachers in Brazil. The study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of a training course that combined Lesson Study and Criteria of Didactical Suitability in developing reflective competence in teachers. Lesson Study is a professional development strategy that encourages teachers to collaborate and reflect on their teaching practices, while Criteria of Didactical Suitability is a tool that guides teachers’ reflection. The study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of Criteria of Didactical Suitability in enhancing reflection skills and to assess the participants’ perception of its usefulness. The analysis revealed that participating teachers improved their reflection skills, specifically by utilizing Criteria of Didactical Suitability more effectively in the third phase of the course. However, the study has limitations, such as being conducted virtually and in a specific context. Overall, this study highlights the potential of combining Lesson Study and Criteria of Didactical Suitability in developing reflective competence in teachers. Further research can explore the efficacy of this approach in different contexts.
课程研究与教学适宜性标准相结合的培训课程教学实践反思的改进
本文讨论了一个涉及巴西八名数学教师的定性案例研究。本研究旨在分析课程研究与教学适宜性标准相结合的培训课程在培养教师反思能力方面的有效性。课程研究是一种鼓励教师合作和反思其教学实践的专业发展策略,而教学适宜性标准是指导教师反思的工具。本研究旨在评估教学适宜性标准在提高反思技能方面的有用性,并评估参与者对其有用性的看法。分析显示,参与的教师提高了他们的反思技能,特别是通过在课程的第三阶段更有效地利用教学适应性标准。然而,这项研究也有局限性,比如是在虚拟环境中进行的,而且是在特定的环境中进行的。总体而言,本研究强调了课程研究与教学适宜性标准相结合在培养教师反思能力方面的潜力。进一步的研究可以探索这种方法在不同背景下的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
271
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信