Not just Kangaroos and Koalas: evaluating the operation and outcomes of Australian local content regulation on pay-TV

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES
Oliver Eklund
{"title":"Not just Kangaroos and Koalas: evaluating the operation and outcomes of Australian local content regulation on pay-TV","authors":"Oliver Eklund","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2023.2249486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The production and distribution of ‘local’ content around the world has been a major regulatory pressure point emerging from the global rise of video streaming platforms. To support greater evidence-based policy development as these regulations emerge, this article reflects on the outcomes of Australian local content regulation on pay-TV. In doing so, the article explores the cultural outcomes of Australian pay-TV local content regulations since the 1990s. This article demonstrates how prevailing Australian cultural policy frameworks facilitate particular types of content. The Australian case study highlights the fraught relationship between policy goals and outcomes that can occur with cultural frameworks that do little to regulate the type of culture produced and suggests a greater separation between cultural and industrial value of content is needed by regulators. The findings from this analysis of Australian cultural policy can be valuable to other interventionist markets as new regulations are considered.","PeriodicalId":51520,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2023.2249486","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The production and distribution of ‘local’ content around the world has been a major regulatory pressure point emerging from the global rise of video streaming platforms. To support greater evidence-based policy development as these regulations emerge, this article reflects on the outcomes of Australian local content regulation on pay-TV. In doing so, the article explores the cultural outcomes of Australian pay-TV local content regulations since the 1990s. This article demonstrates how prevailing Australian cultural policy frameworks facilitate particular types of content. The Australian case study highlights the fraught relationship between policy goals and outcomes that can occur with cultural frameworks that do little to regulate the type of culture produced and suggests a greater separation between cultural and industrial value of content is needed by regulators. The findings from this analysis of Australian cultural policy can be valuable to other interventionist markets as new regulations are considered.
不仅仅是袋鼠和考拉:评估澳大利亚本地付费电视内容监管的运作和结果
随着全球视频流媒体平台的崛起,全球“本地”内容的制作和分发一直是一个主要的监管压力点。随着这些法规的出现,为了支持更大的基于证据的政策发展,本文反映了澳大利亚本地付费电视内容监管的结果。在此过程中,本文探讨了自20世纪90年代以来澳大利亚付费电视本地内容法规的文化成果。本文展示了当前澳大利亚文化政策框架如何促进特定类型的内容。澳大利亚的案例研究突出了政策目标和结果之间令人担忧的关系,这种关系可能发生在文化框架中,而文化框架几乎没有对所产生的文化类型进行监管,这表明监管机构需要在内容的文化价值和工业价值之间进行更大的区分。对澳大利亚文化政策的分析结果对其他考虑新法规的干预主义市场是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信