Optimisation on the Hybridisation Ratio of Pulverised Fuel Ash and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (PFA - GGBS) for the Fabrication of Geopolymer Mortar

Muhammad Hasnolhadi Samsudin, Wai Hoe Kwan, Putri Anis Syahira Mohamad Jamil, Nurhanim Abdul Aziz
{"title":"Optimisation on the Hybridisation Ratio of Pulverised Fuel Ash and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (PFA - GGBS) for the Fabrication of Geopolymer Mortar","authors":"Muhammad Hasnolhadi Samsudin, Wai Hoe Kwan, Putri Anis Syahira Mohamad Jamil, Nurhanim Abdul Aziz","doi":"10.33093/jetap.5.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current cement industry has several environmental and social problems, including high greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution, water consumption, and the generation of large quantities of waste. This matter has grown into a significant concern, and there is now a pressing requirement to substitute the conventional binding material in concrete, namely Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). This paper presents the report on the hybridisation of two industrial by-products, namely pulverised fuel ash (PFA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), to produce an alternative binder known as geopolymer. A set of 11 hybrid PFA-GGBS geopolymeric mortar mixes was created using the complete range of hybridisation ratios, along with different water-to-binder ratios. The freshly mixed hybrid PFA-GGBS geopolymeric mortar was put through a flow table test to examine the required water-to-binder ratio to achieve the targeted level of workability. Afterward, all the samples were allowed to cure at room temperature before undergoing a destructive test to measure their compressive strength. According to the study's findings, the highest compressive strength of 4.6 MPa was achieved with a PFA-GGBS hybridisation ratio of 60-40 in the geopolymeric mortar. However, when the content of GGBS exceeded 40 %, the compressive strength of the hybrid PFA-GGBS geopolymeric mortar produced tended to decrease. Additionally, as the replacement level of GGBS increased, the required water-to-binder ratio also increased to maintain the targeted level of workability, ranging between 0.31-0.41. The PFA-GGBS hybridisation ratios of 60/40, 50/50, 40/60, and 30/70 have shown promising properties to be further refined regarding their application in cementless concrete. Moreover, the study conducted to replace cement as a binder in concrete has the potential to make the construction industry more sustainable and reduce carbon emissions by utilising industrial waste ash that would need to be affordable, strong, durable, and widely available in order to be practical.","PeriodicalId":441201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Physics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33093/jetap.5.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current cement industry has several environmental and social problems, including high greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution, water consumption, and the generation of large quantities of waste. This matter has grown into a significant concern, and there is now a pressing requirement to substitute the conventional binding material in concrete, namely Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). This paper presents the report on the hybridisation of two industrial by-products, namely pulverised fuel ash (PFA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), to produce an alternative binder known as geopolymer. A set of 11 hybrid PFA-GGBS geopolymeric mortar mixes was created using the complete range of hybridisation ratios, along with different water-to-binder ratios. The freshly mixed hybrid PFA-GGBS geopolymeric mortar was put through a flow table test to examine the required water-to-binder ratio to achieve the targeted level of workability. Afterward, all the samples were allowed to cure at room temperature before undergoing a destructive test to measure their compressive strength. According to the study's findings, the highest compressive strength of 4.6 MPa was achieved with a PFA-GGBS hybridisation ratio of 60-40 in the geopolymeric mortar. However, when the content of GGBS exceeded 40 %, the compressive strength of the hybrid PFA-GGBS geopolymeric mortar produced tended to decrease. Additionally, as the replacement level of GGBS increased, the required water-to-binder ratio also increased to maintain the targeted level of workability, ranging between 0.31-0.41. The PFA-GGBS hybridisation ratios of 60/40, 50/50, 40/60, and 30/70 have shown promising properties to be further refined regarding their application in cementless concrete. Moreover, the study conducted to replace cement as a binder in concrete has the potential to make the construction industry more sustainable and reduce carbon emissions by utilising industrial waste ash that would need to be affordable, strong, durable, and widely available in order to be practical.
燃料粉煤灰与矿渣混合配比优化制备地聚合物砂浆
当前水泥行业存在温室气体排放高、空气污染、水消耗大、产生大量废弃物等环境和社会问题。这一问题已成为人们关注的焦点,目前迫切需要用普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)替代混凝土中的常规粘结材料。本文介绍了两种工业副产品,即粉碎的燃料灰(PFA)和磨碎的粒状高炉渣(GGBS)的杂交,以生产一种称为地聚合物的替代粘合剂的报告。采用完整的混合比例以及不同的水胶比,创建了一组11种混合PFA-GGBS地聚合物砂浆混合物。将新混合的PFA-GGBS地聚合物砂浆进行了流动台试验,以检查所需的水胶比以达到目标和易性水平。之后,所有样品在室温下固化,然后进行破坏性测试以测量其抗压强度。根据研究结果,当PFA-GGBS杂化比为60-40时,地聚合物砂浆的抗压强度最高可达4.6 MPa。而当GGBS掺量超过40%时,制备的PFA-GGBS混合地聚合物砂浆的抗压强度有降低的趋势。此外,随着GGBS替代水平的增加,维持可操作性目标水平所需的水胶比也在增加,范围在0.31-0.41之间。PFA-GGBS混合比分别为60/40、50/50、40/60和30/70,在无水泥混凝土中的应用显示出良好的性能,有待进一步完善。此外,这项旨在取代水泥作为混凝土粘合剂的研究有可能使建筑行业更具可持续性,并通过利用工业废灰来减少碳排放,而工业废灰需要价格合理、坚固耐用、广泛可用,才能成为实用材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信