Modulations of facial emotionality on facial processing and attentional biases in individuals with low or high social anxiety: an event-related potential study

Ya-Chun Feng, Bo-Cheng Kuo, Wen-Yau Hsu
{"title":"Modulations of facial emotionality on facial processing and attentional biases in individuals with low or high social anxiety: an event-related potential study","authors":"Ya-Chun Feng, Bo-Cheng Kuo, Wen-Yau Hsu","doi":"10.22541/au.167407910.06088396/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies have demonstrated the influences of facial emotionality on attentional and perceptual processing when socially anxious individuals perceive threatening information from facial expressions. However, it remains unclear whether and how positive expressions may also affect the attention and perception of socially anxious individuals. This event-related potential (ERP) study addresses this issue and examines the temporal dynamics of electrophysiological responses to negative and positive faces in individuals with high (HSA; n = 56) or low (LSA; n = 47) social anxiety in a dot-probe task. Four face pairs (neutral-neutral, angry-neutral, happy-neutral, and angry-happy) were presented to probe the influences of positive and negative emotionality. The behavioural results showed a greater negative bias in reaction times for the LSA group than the HSA group when angry-happy face pairs were presented. Our ERP results showed an enhanced N170 effect for the LSA group in comparison to the HSA group when emotional faces were presented in angry-neutral, happy-neutral, and angry-happy face pairs. Moreover, greater N2pc effects on emotional faces were found in the HSA group when angry-neutral and happy-neutral face pairs were presented. However, this was not true for the LSA group. No N2pc effect was found when both positive and negative faces were presented simultaneously. We did not find any significant P1 effect. Together, our results showed that facial emotionality influenced facial processing and attention bias in relation to social anxiety. Socially anxious individuals perceived less emotional facial information and had attention biases towards both negative and positive faces.","PeriodicalId":487619,"journal":{"name":"Authorea (Authorea)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Authorea (Authorea)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22541/au.167407910.06088396/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated the influences of facial emotionality on attentional and perceptual processing when socially anxious individuals perceive threatening information from facial expressions. However, it remains unclear whether and how positive expressions may also affect the attention and perception of socially anxious individuals. This event-related potential (ERP) study addresses this issue and examines the temporal dynamics of electrophysiological responses to negative and positive faces in individuals with high (HSA; n = 56) or low (LSA; n = 47) social anxiety in a dot-probe task. Four face pairs (neutral-neutral, angry-neutral, happy-neutral, and angry-happy) were presented to probe the influences of positive and negative emotionality. The behavioural results showed a greater negative bias in reaction times for the LSA group than the HSA group when angry-happy face pairs were presented. Our ERP results showed an enhanced N170 effect for the LSA group in comparison to the HSA group when emotional faces were presented in angry-neutral, happy-neutral, and angry-happy face pairs. Moreover, greater N2pc effects on emotional faces were found in the HSA group when angry-neutral and happy-neutral face pairs were presented. However, this was not true for the LSA group. No N2pc effect was found when both positive and negative faces were presented simultaneously. We did not find any significant P1 effect. Together, our results showed that facial emotionality influenced facial processing and attention bias in relation to social anxiety. Socially anxious individuals perceived less emotional facial information and had attention biases towards both negative and positive faces.
低、高社交焦虑个体的面部情绪对面部加工和注意偏差的调节:一项事件相关电位研究
先前的研究已经证明,当社交焦虑个体从面部表情中感知威胁信息时,面部情绪对注意和知觉加工的影响。然而,目前尚不清楚积极的表达是否以及如何影响社交焦虑个体的注意力和感知。这项事件相关电位(ERP)研究解决了这个问题,并检查了高HSA个体对消极和积极面孔的电生理反应的时间动态。n = 56)或low (LSA;N = 47)点探测任务中的社交焦虑。采用中性-中性、愤怒-中性、快乐-中性和愤怒-快乐四对面孔,探讨积极情绪和消极情绪对受试者的影响。行为结果显示,当出现愤怒-快乐的面孔对时,LSA组的反应时间比HSA组有更大的负偏倚。我们的ERP结果显示,与HSA组相比,当情绪面孔以愤怒-中立、快乐-中立和愤怒-快乐面孔对呈现时,LSA组的N170效应增强。此外,当出现愤怒中立和快乐中立的面孔对时,HSA组对情绪面孔的N2pc效应更大。但是,对于LSA组则不是这样。同时呈现正面和负面面孔时,不存在N2pc效应。我们没有发现任何显著的P1效应。总之,我们的研究结果表明,面部情绪影响与社交焦虑相关的面部加工和注意偏差。社交焦虑的个体感知到较少的情绪面部信息,并且对消极和积极的面孔都有注意偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信