PO45

Shubhangi Shah, Xiaoyan Deng, Emma Fields, Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, Bridget Quinn
{"title":"PO45","authors":"Shubhangi Shah, Xiaoyan Deng, Emma Fields, Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, Bridget Quinn","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy and the fourth most common cancer in women [1]. Treatment is composed of a total hysterectomy, possibly followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy (RT) based on risk factors and staging [2]. Consistent follow up after treatment is integral to assessing for both toxicities and recurrence. Encouraging adjuvant vaginal dilator use has been shown to prevent vaginal stenosis, a common side effect of both surgery and RT [2]. However, about 9% of the female population in the USA face significant geographical barriers to receiving gynecologic cancer treatment [3]. Furthermore, previous studies showed being over 50 miles from a high-volume hospital was associated with increased risk of non-adherence care and increased mortality [4]. Increased time from endometrial biopsy to surgery is one documented factor that increased risk of poor outcomes [5]. This retrospective study evaluates if geographical location is associated with access to endometrial cancer care and post-radiation vaginal stenosis. Materials and Methods Patients enrolled in the study underwent surgery +/- RT for Stage I-IIIC endometrial cancer. Vaginal dilator use was recommended to all patients receiving RT. Vaginal length at follow up visits was measured with a vaginal sound. Data from patient charts was used to determine patient demographics, location, and follow up care. Results Forty-two patients had sufficient data for analysis. Average distance from the treatment hospital was 40.9 miles, 54% of patients lived in an urban county. Average number of days from an endometrial biopsy to surgical treatment was 43 days. Living >80 miles from the hospital was associated with an 80% increase in the days between an endometrial biopsy and surgery, compared to those living within 20 miles (p<0.01). Average months of follow up after surgery was 31. There was no impact of an increased distance from the hospital affecting months of follow-up care, vaginal stenosis, or dilator adherence. Conclusions This study provides evidence that living extreme distances from a high-volume cancer center is associated with delayed access to care. Furthermore, there's no direct impact of geography on post-RT vaginal dilation or adherence to care. Our findings suggest reduced discrimination in EC care despite geographical barriers. Further studies to evaluate impact of geography on mortality rates are needed. References: 1. BRAUN MM, OVERBEEK-WAGER EA, GRUMBO RJ. Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(6):468-474. Accessed January 30, 2023. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2016/0315/p468.html2. Quinn, BA, et al. Change in Vaginal Length and Sexual Function in Women Who Undergo Surgery ± Radiation Therapy for Endometrial Cancer . Brachytherapy, 2023. In press.3. Shalowitz DI, Vinograd AM, Giuntoli RL. Geographic access to gynecologic cancer care in the United States. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138(1):115-120. doi:10.1016/J.YGYNO.2015.04.0254. Bristow RE, Powell MA, Al-Hammadi N, et al. Disparities in Ovarian Cancer Care Quality and Survival According to Race and Socioeconomic Status. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2013;105(11):823. doi:10.1093/JNCI/DJT0655. Shalowitz DI, Epstein AJ, Buckingham L, Ko EM, Giuntoli RL. Survival implications of time to surgical treatment of endometrial cancers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(3):268.e1-268.e18. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1050 Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy and the fourth most common cancer in women [1]. Treatment is composed of a total hysterectomy, possibly followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy (RT) based on risk factors and staging [2]. Consistent follow up after treatment is integral to assessing for both toxicities and recurrence. Encouraging adjuvant vaginal dilator use has been shown to prevent vaginal stenosis, a common side effect of both surgery and RT [2]. However, about 9% of the female population in the USA face significant geographical barriers to receiving gynecologic cancer treatment [3]. Furthermore, previous studies showed being over 50 miles from a high-volume hospital was associated with increased risk of non-adherence care and increased mortality [4]. Increased time from endometrial biopsy to surgery is one documented factor that increased risk of poor outcomes [5]. This retrospective study evaluates if geographical location is associated with access to endometrial cancer care and post-radiation vaginal stenosis. Patients enrolled in the study underwent surgery +/- RT for Stage I-IIIC endometrial cancer. Vaginal dilator use was recommended to all patients receiving RT. Vaginal length at follow up visits was measured with a vaginal sound. Data from patient charts was used to determine patient demographics, location, and follow up care. Forty-two patients had sufficient data for analysis. Average distance from the treatment hospital was 40.9 miles, 54% of patients lived in an urban county. Average number of days from an endometrial biopsy to surgical treatment was 43 days. Living >80 miles from the hospital was associated with an 80% increase in the days between an endometrial biopsy and surgery, compared to those living within 20 miles (p<0.01). Average months of follow up after surgery was 31. There was no impact of an increased distance from the hospital affecting months of follow-up care, vaginal stenosis, or dilator adherence. This study provides evidence that living extreme distances from a high-volume cancer center is associated with delayed access to care. Furthermore, there's no direct impact of geography on post-RT vaginal dilation or adherence to care. Our findings suggest reduced discrimination in EC care despite geographical barriers. Further studies to evaluate impact of geography on mortality rates are needed. References: 1. BRAUN MM, OVERBEEK-WAGER EA, GRUMBO RJ. Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(6):468-474. Accessed January 30, 2023. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2016/0315/p468.html2. Quinn, BA, et al. Change in Vaginal Length and Sexual Function in Women Who Undergo Surgery ± Radiation Therapy for Endometrial Cancer . Brachytherapy, 2023. In press.3. Shalowitz DI, Vinograd AM, Giuntoli RL. Geographic access to gynecologic cancer care in the United States. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138(1):115-120. doi:10.1016/J.YGYNO.2015.04.0254. Bristow RE, Powell MA, Al-Hammadi N, et al. Disparities in Ovarian Cancer Care Quality and Survival According to Race and Socioeconomic Status. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2013;105(11):823. doi:10.1093/JNCI/DJT0655. Shalowitz DI, Epstein AJ, Buckingham L, Ko EM, Giuntoli RL. Survival implications of time to surgical treatment of endometrial cancers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(3):268.e1-268.e18. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1050","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy and the fourth most common cancer in women [1]. Treatment is composed of a total hysterectomy, possibly followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy (RT) based on risk factors and staging [2]. Consistent follow up after treatment is integral to assessing for both toxicities and recurrence. Encouraging adjuvant vaginal dilator use has been shown to prevent vaginal stenosis, a common side effect of both surgery and RT [2]. However, about 9% of the female population in the USA face significant geographical barriers to receiving gynecologic cancer treatment [3]. Furthermore, previous studies showed being over 50 miles from a high-volume hospital was associated with increased risk of non-adherence care and increased mortality [4]. Increased time from endometrial biopsy to surgery is one documented factor that increased risk of poor outcomes [5]. This retrospective study evaluates if geographical location is associated with access to endometrial cancer care and post-radiation vaginal stenosis. Materials and Methods Patients enrolled in the study underwent surgery +/- RT for Stage I-IIIC endometrial cancer. Vaginal dilator use was recommended to all patients receiving RT. Vaginal length at follow up visits was measured with a vaginal sound. Data from patient charts was used to determine patient demographics, location, and follow up care. Results Forty-two patients had sufficient data for analysis. Average distance from the treatment hospital was 40.9 miles, 54% of patients lived in an urban county. Average number of days from an endometrial biopsy to surgical treatment was 43 days. Living >80 miles from the hospital was associated with an 80% increase in the days between an endometrial biopsy and surgery, compared to those living within 20 miles (p<0.01). Average months of follow up after surgery was 31. There was no impact of an increased distance from the hospital affecting months of follow-up care, vaginal stenosis, or dilator adherence. Conclusions This study provides evidence that living extreme distances from a high-volume cancer center is associated with delayed access to care. Furthermore, there's no direct impact of geography on post-RT vaginal dilation or adherence to care. Our findings suggest reduced discrimination in EC care despite geographical barriers. Further studies to evaluate impact of geography on mortality rates are needed. References: 1. BRAUN MM, OVERBEEK-WAGER EA, GRUMBO RJ. Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(6):468-474. Accessed January 30, 2023. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2016/0315/p468.html2. Quinn, BA, et al. Change in Vaginal Length and Sexual Function in Women Who Undergo Surgery ± Radiation Therapy for Endometrial Cancer . Brachytherapy, 2023. In press.3. Shalowitz DI, Vinograd AM, Giuntoli RL. Geographic access to gynecologic cancer care in the United States. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138(1):115-120. doi:10.1016/J.YGYNO.2015.04.0254. Bristow RE, Powell MA, Al-Hammadi N, et al. Disparities in Ovarian Cancer Care Quality and Survival According to Race and Socioeconomic Status. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2013;105(11):823. doi:10.1093/JNCI/DJT0655. Shalowitz DI, Epstein AJ, Buckingham L, Ko EM, Giuntoli RL. Survival implications of time to surgical treatment of endometrial cancers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(3):268.e1-268.e18. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1050 Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy and the fourth most common cancer in women [1]. Treatment is composed of a total hysterectomy, possibly followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy (RT) based on risk factors and staging [2]. Consistent follow up after treatment is integral to assessing for both toxicities and recurrence. Encouraging adjuvant vaginal dilator use has been shown to prevent vaginal stenosis, a common side effect of both surgery and RT [2]. However, about 9% of the female population in the USA face significant geographical barriers to receiving gynecologic cancer treatment [3]. Furthermore, previous studies showed being over 50 miles from a high-volume hospital was associated with increased risk of non-adherence care and increased mortality [4]. Increased time from endometrial biopsy to surgery is one documented factor that increased risk of poor outcomes [5]. This retrospective study evaluates if geographical location is associated with access to endometrial cancer care and post-radiation vaginal stenosis. Patients enrolled in the study underwent surgery +/- RT for Stage I-IIIC endometrial cancer. Vaginal dilator use was recommended to all patients receiving RT. Vaginal length at follow up visits was measured with a vaginal sound. Data from patient charts was used to determine patient demographics, location, and follow up care. Forty-two patients had sufficient data for analysis. Average distance from the treatment hospital was 40.9 miles, 54% of patients lived in an urban county. Average number of days from an endometrial biopsy to surgical treatment was 43 days. Living >80 miles from the hospital was associated with an 80% increase in the days between an endometrial biopsy and surgery, compared to those living within 20 miles (p<0.01). Average months of follow up after surgery was 31. There was no impact of an increased distance from the hospital affecting months of follow-up care, vaginal stenosis, or dilator adherence. This study provides evidence that living extreme distances from a high-volume cancer center is associated with delayed access to care. Furthermore, there's no direct impact of geography on post-RT vaginal dilation or adherence to care. Our findings suggest reduced discrimination in EC care despite geographical barriers. Further studies to evaluate impact of geography on mortality rates are needed. References: 1. BRAUN MM, OVERBEEK-WAGER EA, GRUMBO RJ. Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(6):468-474. Accessed January 30, 2023. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2016/0315/p468.html2. Quinn, BA, et al. Change in Vaginal Length and Sexual Function in Women Who Undergo Surgery ± Radiation Therapy for Endometrial Cancer . Brachytherapy, 2023. In press.3. Shalowitz DI, Vinograd AM, Giuntoli RL. Geographic access to gynecologic cancer care in the United States. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138(1):115-120. doi:10.1016/J.YGYNO.2015.04.0254. Bristow RE, Powell MA, Al-Hammadi N, et al. Disparities in Ovarian Cancer Care Quality and Survival According to Race and Socioeconomic Status. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2013;105(11):823. doi:10.1093/JNCI/DJT0655. Shalowitz DI, Epstein AJ, Buckingham L, Ko EM, Giuntoli RL. Survival implications of time to surgical treatment of endometrial cancers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(3):268.e1-268.e18. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1050
PO45
子宫内膜癌(Endometrial cancer, EC)是最常见的妇科恶性肿瘤,也是女性第四大常见癌症[1]。治疗包括全子宫切除术,根据危险因素和分期,可能随后进行辅助化疗或放疗(RT)[2]。治疗后的持续随访是评估毒性和复发的必要条件。鼓励辅助使用阴道扩张器已被证明可以预防阴道狭窄,这是手术和RT的常见副作用[2]。然而,美国约有9%的女性在接受妇科癌症治疗方面面临明显的地理障碍[3]。此外,先前的研究表明,距离大型医院超过50英里与不遵守护理的风险增加和死亡率增加有关[4]。从子宫内膜活检到手术的时间增加是增加不良预后风险的一个有记载的因素[5]。这项回顾性研究评估地理位置是否与获得子宫内膜癌治疗和放疗后阴道狭窄有关。材料和方法入选研究的I-IIIC期子宫内膜癌患者接受手术+/- RT治疗。建议所有接受阴道扩张器治疗的患者使用阴道扩张器。随访时阴道长度用阴道声测量。来自患者图表的数据用于确定患者的人口统计、位置和随访护理。结果42例患者资料充足,可供分析。到治疗医院的平均距离为40.9英里,54%的患者居住在城市县。从子宫内膜活检到手术治疗的平均天数为43天。与居住在20英里以内的人相比,居住在距离医院>80英里的人子宫内膜活检和手术之间的天数增加了80%(与居住在20英里以内的人相比,居住在距离医院>80英里的人子宫内膜活检和手术之间的天数增加了80% (p<0.01)。术后平均随访时间为31个月。离医院距离的增加对随访时间、阴道狭窄或扩张器依从性没有影响。这项研究提供的证据表明,居住在离大型癌症中心极远的地方与延迟获得护理有关。此外,地理位置对rt后阴道扩张或护理依从性没有直接影响。我们的研究结果表明,尽管存在地理障碍,但EC护理中的歧视减少了。需要进一步研究以评估地理对死亡率的影响。引用:1。布朗mm, overbek - wager ea, grumbo rj。子宫内膜癌的诊断和治疗。中华医学杂志,2016;93(6):468-474。2023年1月30日访问。https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2016/0315/p468.html2。Quinn, BA等人。子宫内膜癌手术±放疗后女性阴道长度和性功能的变化。近距离放射疗法,2023年。在press.3。Shalowitz DI, Vinograd AM, Giuntoli RL。美国妇科癌症治疗的地理可及性中华妇产科杂志,2015;38(1):115-120。doi: 10.1016 / J.YGYNO.2015.04.0254。Bristow RE, Powell MA, al - hammadi N,等。根据种族和社会经济地位卵巢癌护理质量和生存的差异。中华肿瘤杂志,2013;35(11):823。doi: 10.1093 / JNCI / DJT0655。Shalowitz DI, Epstein AJ, Buckingham L, Ko EM, Giuntoli RL。子宫内膜癌手术治疗时间对生存率的影响。中华妇产科杂志,2017;16(3):388 - 388。doi: 10.1016 / j.ajog.2016.11.1050
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信