PO69

Brian J. Moran, Roksana Tech, Jessica Manzella
{"title":"PO69","authors":"Brian J. Moran, Roksana Tech, Jessica Manzella","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Standard of care for localized prostate cancer is either surgical or radiotherapeutic. While total gland ablation was intended, recent efforts of certain institutions using cryotherapy or HIFU (High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound) have explored the efficacy of focal therapy for select patients. Diagnostic technology has evolved and improved the ability and accuracy to identify tumor extent and location. This analysis investigates low-dose-rate (LDR) focal prostate brachytherapy PSA outcomes by demonstrating impact and thus correlation with focal target volume. Method 132 patients, mean age 73.5 years old (range 48-89 y/o), underwent focal therapy using LDR prostate brachytherapy from 12/2007 - 2/2019. Patients were categorized as low (63/132, 47.7%), intermediate (55/132, 41.7%), or high (14/132, 10.6%) risk groups using D'Amico risk group stratification. Prescribed dose to focal target volume was 115Gy, 125Gy, 144Gy for Cs-131 (66/132, 50%), Pd-103 (1/132, 0.8%), and I-125 (65/132, 49.2%) respectively. Results Mean preplan focal target volume was 21.5cc (range 7.5-58.2cc). Mean planning total prostate volume was 63.1cc (range 18.1-143.1cc). Mean preplan focal target volume of the prostate, as a percentage of total prostate volume, was 30.6%. Median follow up was 20.2 months (range 1- 134 months). Focal brachytherapy greater than 1-year follow up, the PSA was impacted by a mean of 59.2% from initial PSA (95% Confidence Interval [58.7, 59.7]). Conclusion Focal LDR prostate brachytherapy may offer a more conservative therapeutic option for localized prostate cancer in select patients. For patients found to have recurrence of disease in the treated volume, or new disease identified in the untreated prostate volume, should be amenable to numerous salvage therapies. With further analysis, additional investigation will evaluate quality of life impact and dosimetric considerations. This analysis warrants further exploration of the role of LDR prostate brachytherapy treatment of select patients with localized prostate cancer. Standard of care for localized prostate cancer is either surgical or radiotherapeutic. While total gland ablation was intended, recent efforts of certain institutions using cryotherapy or HIFU (High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound) have explored the efficacy of focal therapy for select patients. Diagnostic technology has evolved and improved the ability and accuracy to identify tumor extent and location. This analysis investigates low-dose-rate (LDR) focal prostate brachytherapy PSA outcomes by demonstrating impact and thus correlation with focal target volume. 132 patients, mean age 73.5 years old (range 48-89 y/o), underwent focal therapy using LDR prostate brachytherapy from 12/2007 - 2/2019. Patients were categorized as low (63/132, 47.7%), intermediate (55/132, 41.7%), or high (14/132, 10.6%) risk groups using D'Amico risk group stratification. Prescribed dose to focal target volume was 115Gy, 125Gy, 144Gy for Cs-131 (66/132, 50%), Pd-103 (1/132, 0.8%), and I-125 (65/132, 49.2%) respectively. Mean preplan focal target volume was 21.5cc (range 7.5-58.2cc). Mean planning total prostate volume was 63.1cc (range 18.1-143.1cc). Mean preplan focal target volume of the prostate, as a percentage of total prostate volume, was 30.6%. Median follow up was 20.2 months (range 1- 134 months). Focal brachytherapy greater than 1-year follow up, the PSA was impacted by a mean of 59.2% from initial PSA (95% Confidence Interval [58.7, 59.7]). Focal LDR prostate brachytherapy may offer a more conservative therapeutic option for localized prostate cancer in select patients. For patients found to have recurrence of disease in the treated volume, or new disease identified in the untreated prostate volume, should be amenable to numerous salvage therapies. With further analysis, additional investigation will evaluate quality of life impact and dosimetric considerations. This analysis warrants further exploration of the role of LDR prostate brachytherapy treatment of select patients with localized prostate cancer.","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Standard of care for localized prostate cancer is either surgical or radiotherapeutic. While total gland ablation was intended, recent efforts of certain institutions using cryotherapy or HIFU (High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound) have explored the efficacy of focal therapy for select patients. Diagnostic technology has evolved and improved the ability and accuracy to identify tumor extent and location. This analysis investigates low-dose-rate (LDR) focal prostate brachytherapy PSA outcomes by demonstrating impact and thus correlation with focal target volume. Method 132 patients, mean age 73.5 years old (range 48-89 y/o), underwent focal therapy using LDR prostate brachytherapy from 12/2007 - 2/2019. Patients were categorized as low (63/132, 47.7%), intermediate (55/132, 41.7%), or high (14/132, 10.6%) risk groups using D'Amico risk group stratification. Prescribed dose to focal target volume was 115Gy, 125Gy, 144Gy for Cs-131 (66/132, 50%), Pd-103 (1/132, 0.8%), and I-125 (65/132, 49.2%) respectively. Results Mean preplan focal target volume was 21.5cc (range 7.5-58.2cc). Mean planning total prostate volume was 63.1cc (range 18.1-143.1cc). Mean preplan focal target volume of the prostate, as a percentage of total prostate volume, was 30.6%. Median follow up was 20.2 months (range 1- 134 months). Focal brachytherapy greater than 1-year follow up, the PSA was impacted by a mean of 59.2% from initial PSA (95% Confidence Interval [58.7, 59.7]). Conclusion Focal LDR prostate brachytherapy may offer a more conservative therapeutic option for localized prostate cancer in select patients. For patients found to have recurrence of disease in the treated volume, or new disease identified in the untreated prostate volume, should be amenable to numerous salvage therapies. With further analysis, additional investigation will evaluate quality of life impact and dosimetric considerations. This analysis warrants further exploration of the role of LDR prostate brachytherapy treatment of select patients with localized prostate cancer. Standard of care for localized prostate cancer is either surgical or radiotherapeutic. While total gland ablation was intended, recent efforts of certain institutions using cryotherapy or HIFU (High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound) have explored the efficacy of focal therapy for select patients. Diagnostic technology has evolved and improved the ability and accuracy to identify tumor extent and location. This analysis investigates low-dose-rate (LDR) focal prostate brachytherapy PSA outcomes by demonstrating impact and thus correlation with focal target volume. 132 patients, mean age 73.5 years old (range 48-89 y/o), underwent focal therapy using LDR prostate brachytherapy from 12/2007 - 2/2019. Patients were categorized as low (63/132, 47.7%), intermediate (55/132, 41.7%), or high (14/132, 10.6%) risk groups using D'Amico risk group stratification. Prescribed dose to focal target volume was 115Gy, 125Gy, 144Gy for Cs-131 (66/132, 50%), Pd-103 (1/132, 0.8%), and I-125 (65/132, 49.2%) respectively. Mean preplan focal target volume was 21.5cc (range 7.5-58.2cc). Mean planning total prostate volume was 63.1cc (range 18.1-143.1cc). Mean preplan focal target volume of the prostate, as a percentage of total prostate volume, was 30.6%. Median follow up was 20.2 months (range 1- 134 months). Focal brachytherapy greater than 1-year follow up, the PSA was impacted by a mean of 59.2% from initial PSA (95% Confidence Interval [58.7, 59.7]). Focal LDR prostate brachytherapy may offer a more conservative therapeutic option for localized prostate cancer in select patients. For patients found to have recurrence of disease in the treated volume, or new disease identified in the untreated prostate volume, should be amenable to numerous salvage therapies. With further analysis, additional investigation will evaluate quality of life impact and dosimetric considerations. This analysis warrants further exploration of the role of LDR prostate brachytherapy treatment of select patients with localized prostate cancer.
PO69
目的局部前列腺癌的治疗标准是手术或放疗。虽然整个腺体消融是有意的,但最近某些机构使用冷冻疗法或HIFU(高强度聚焦超声)的努力已经探索了局部治疗对选定患者的疗效。诊断技术的发展提高了识别肿瘤范围和位置的能力和准确性。本分析研究低剂量率(LDR)局灶性前列腺近距离PSA治疗结果,证明其影响和与局灶靶体积的相关性。方法2007年12月至2019年2月,132例患者接受LDR前列腺近距离局部治疗,平均年龄73.5岁(48 ~ 89岁)。采用D'Amico风险组分层将患者分为低(63/132,47.7%)、中(55/132,41.7%)和高(14/132,10.6%)风险组。Cs-131(66/132, 50%)、Pd-103(1/132, 0.8%)、I-125(65/132, 49.2%)对病灶靶体积的处方剂量分别为115Gy、125Gy、144Gy。结果平均术前病灶靶体积21.5cc(范围7.5 ~ 58.2cc)。平均计划前列腺总容积为63.1cc(范围18.1-143.1cc)。平均术前前列腺局灶靶体积占前列腺总体积的百分比为30.6%。中位随访时间为20.2个月(1- 134个月)。局灶性近距离治疗随访超过1年,PSA比初始PSA平均影响59.2%(95%可信区间[58.7,59.7])。结论局灶性LDR前列腺近距离放射治疗可为局部前列腺癌患者提供更为保守的治疗选择。对于在治疗体积中发现疾病复发的患者,或在未经治疗的前列腺体积中发现新疾病的患者,应该接受多种挽救性治疗。通过进一步的分析,进一步的调查将评估生活质量的影响和剂量学考虑。这一分析值得进一步探讨LDR前列腺近距离放射治疗在局部前列腺癌患者中的作用。治疗局限性前列腺癌的标准方法是手术或放射治疗。虽然整个腺体消融是有意的,但最近某些机构使用冷冻疗法或HIFU(高强度聚焦超声)的努力已经探索了局部治疗对选定患者的疗效。诊断技术的发展提高了识别肿瘤范围和位置的能力和准确性。本分析研究低剂量率(LDR)局灶性前列腺近距离PSA治疗结果,证明其影响和与局灶靶体积的相关性。132例患者,平均年龄73.5岁(48-89岁),于2007年12月至2019年2月接受了LDR前列腺近距离放射治疗。采用D'Amico风险组分层将患者分为低(63/132,47.7%)、中(55/132,41.7%)和高(14/132,10.6%)风险组。Cs-131(66/132, 50%)、Pd-103(1/132, 0.8%)、I-125(65/132, 49.2%)对病灶靶体积的处方剂量分别为115Gy、125Gy、144Gy。平均术前病灶靶体积为21.5cc(范围7.5-58.2cc)。平均计划前列腺总容积为63.1cc(范围18.1-143.1cc)。平均术前前列腺局灶靶体积占前列腺总体积的百分比为30.6%。中位随访时间为20.2个月(1- 134个月)。局灶性近距离治疗随访超过1年,PSA比初始PSA平均影响59.2%(95%可信区间[58.7,59.7])。局灶性LDR前列腺近距离放射治疗可能为局部前列腺癌患者提供更保守的治疗选择。对于在治疗体积中发现疾病复发的患者,或在未经治疗的前列腺体积中发现新疾病的患者,应该接受多种挽救性治疗。通过进一步的分析,进一步的调查将评估生活质量的影响和剂量学考虑。这一分析值得进一步探讨LDR前列腺近距离放射治疗在局部前列腺癌患者中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信