Acquisition of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound Images With Deep Learning

Evan Baum MD , Megha D. Tandel MPH , Casey Ren MD , Yingjie Weng MS , Matthew Pascucci MD , John Kugler MD , Kathryn Cardoza MD , Andre Kumar MD, MEd
{"title":"Acquisition of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound Images With Deep Learning","authors":"Evan Baum MD ,&nbsp;Megha D. Tandel MPH ,&nbsp;Casey Ren MD ,&nbsp;Yingjie Weng MS ,&nbsp;Matthew Pascucci MD ,&nbsp;John Kugler MD ,&nbsp;Kathryn Cardoza MD ,&nbsp;Andre Kumar MD, MEd","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2023.100023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) machines may use deep learning, a subfield of artificial intelligence (AI), to improve image interpretation and acquisition in real time. The impact of AI on POCUS learning is unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>Do AI-enhanced devices equipped with deep learning aid in cardiac image acquisition and interpretation among POCUS novices?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>We conducted a single-center investigation from 2021 through 2022. Internal medicine trainees (N = 43) with limited POCUS experience were randomized to receive a POCUS device with (Echonous; n = 22) or without (Butterfly; n = 21) AI functionality for 2 weeks while on inpatient rotations. AI device functionality included guidance for optimal probe placement to acquire an apical four-chamber (A4C) view and ejection fraction estimations based on deep learning. Participants used the devices at their discretion for patient-related care after randomization. The primary outcome was the time to acquire A4C images on a standardized patient. Secondary outcomes included A4C image quality using a validated scale, image quiz performance, and attitudes. Measurements were performed at randomization and at 2-week follow-up using the same standardized patient.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both AI and non-AI groups showed similar scan times and image quality scores at baseline. At follow-up, the AI group showed faster scan times (57 s [interquartile range (IQR), 32-75 s] vs 85 s [IQR, 50-172 s]; <em>P</em> = .01), higher image quality scores (4.5 [IQR, 2-5.5] vs 2 [IQR, 1-3]; <em>P</em> &lt; .01), and more accurately identified reduced systolic function on the image quiz (85% vs 50%; <em>P</em> = .02) vs the non-AI group. The AI group used the devices more than the non-AI group (median, 5.5 times [IQR, 4-10 times] vs 2 times [IQR, 0-4 times]; <em>P</em> &lt; .01). Trust in the AI features did not change during the intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>POCUS devices with deep learning functionality may improve A4C image acquisition and interpretation by novices. Future studies are needed to determine the extent that AI impacts POCUS learning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789223000235/pdfft?md5=f2f40d80c3cfa78dc9225371899bac67&pid=1-s2.0-S2949789223000235-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789223000235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) machines may use deep learning, a subfield of artificial intelligence (AI), to improve image interpretation and acquisition in real time. The impact of AI on POCUS learning is unknown.

Research Question

Do AI-enhanced devices equipped with deep learning aid in cardiac image acquisition and interpretation among POCUS novices?

Study Design and Methods

We conducted a single-center investigation from 2021 through 2022. Internal medicine trainees (N = 43) with limited POCUS experience were randomized to receive a POCUS device with (Echonous; n = 22) or without (Butterfly; n = 21) AI functionality for 2 weeks while on inpatient rotations. AI device functionality included guidance for optimal probe placement to acquire an apical four-chamber (A4C) view and ejection fraction estimations based on deep learning. Participants used the devices at their discretion for patient-related care after randomization. The primary outcome was the time to acquire A4C images on a standardized patient. Secondary outcomes included A4C image quality using a validated scale, image quiz performance, and attitudes. Measurements were performed at randomization and at 2-week follow-up using the same standardized patient.

Results

Both AI and non-AI groups showed similar scan times and image quality scores at baseline. At follow-up, the AI group showed faster scan times (57 s [interquartile range (IQR), 32-75 s] vs 85 s [IQR, 50-172 s]; P = .01), higher image quality scores (4.5 [IQR, 2-5.5] vs 2 [IQR, 1-3]; P < .01), and more accurately identified reduced systolic function on the image quiz (85% vs 50%; P = .02) vs the non-AI group. The AI group used the devices more than the non-AI group (median, 5.5 times [IQR, 4-10 times] vs 2 times [IQR, 0-4 times]; P < .01). Trust in the AI features did not change during the intervention.

Interpretation

POCUS devices with deep learning functionality may improve A4C image acquisition and interpretation by novices. Future studies are needed to determine the extent that AI impacts POCUS learning.

心脏护理点超声图像的深度学习获取
护理点超声检查(POCUS)机器可以使用人工智能(AI)的一子领域——深度学习来改进实时图像解释和采集。人工智能对POCUS学习的影响尚不清楚。配备深度学习的人工智能增强设备是否有助于POCUS新手的心脏图像采集和解释?研究设计和方法我们从2021年到2022年进行了一项单中心调查。具有有限POCUS经验的内科实习生(N = 43)随机接受POCUS装置(Echonous;n = 22)或不含(Butterfly;n = 21)在住院病人轮转期间使用人工智能功能2周。人工智能设备功能包括指导最佳探针放置,以获得顶点四室(A4C)视图和基于深度学习的射血分数估计。随机分组后,参与者自行决定使用这些设备进行与患者相关的护理。主要结果是获得标准化患者A4C图像的时间。次要结果包括使用有效量表的A4C图像质量,图像测验表现和态度。在随机化和2周的随访中对同一标准化患者进行测量。结果人工智能组和非人工智能组在基线时的扫描时间和图像质量得分相似。在随访中,人工智能组的扫描时间更快(57 s[四分位间距,32-75 s] vs 85 s[四分位间距,50-172 s]);P = 0.01),更高的图像质量评分(4.5 [IQR, 2-5.5] vs 2 [IQR, 1-3];P & lt;.01),在图像测试中更准确地识别出收缩功能下降(85% vs 50%;P = .02)与非ai组相比。人工智能组使用设备的次数多于非人工智能组(中位数,5.5次[IQR, 4-10次]vs 2次[IQR, 0-4次];P & lt;. 01)。在干预期间,对人工智能功能的信任没有改变。具有深度学习功能的pocus设备可以改善新手的A4C图像采集和解释。未来的研究需要确定人工智能对POCUS学习的影响程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信